During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian government allowed eligible individuals to withdraw up to A$20,000 (around half median annual wage income) across two tranches from their retirement accounts, ordinarily inaccessible until retirement. Based on
historical returns, the modal withdrawal by the modal-aged withdrawer can be expected to reduce their balance at retirement by more than $120,000 in today’s dollars. One in six working-age people withdrew a total of $38 billion (on average, 51% of their balances).
These transfers represented a liquidity shock and were much larger than those considered
in the literature to date. Using administrative and weekly bank transactions data, we
find a high marginal propensity to spend (MPX) given the size of the transfers of at least 0.43 within eight weeks, spread broadly across categories (including around half or more on non-durables) and across withdrawers. The response to the second withdrawal, which two-thirds returned for and which occurred after the activity had recovered, was even larger at 0.48. Withdrawal and spending are predicted strongly by numerous measures of poor financial health, high pre-withdrawal rates of cash withdrawal and gambling, and younger age. The MPX of rational, forward-looking but liquidity constrained consumers can be expected to asymptote to zero as the transfer size rises, while that of present-biased consumers can be expected to remain high. Our findings overwhelmingly are consistent
with the latter, suggesting roughly 80% of withdrawers were present-biased. In selecting
strongly on the present-biased, the program presents a sharp trade-off between effective
macroeconomic stimulus and suboptimal retirement saving policy.