Article
The Jones Act is a common enemy among anyone who is interested in low-hanging-fruit policy changes, but it isn’t universal. Some of the policy wonks at the Niskanen center favor more conservative reforms to the act, and some usually libertarian-leaning economists like Brian Albrecht and Josh Hendrick...

The Jones Act is a common enemy among anyone who is interested in low-hanging-fruit policy changes, but it isn’t universal. Some of the policy wonks at the Niskanen center favor more conservative reforms to the act, and some usually libertarian-leaning economists like Brian Albrecht and Josh Hendrickson express some doubts over criticisms or even explicitly defend the Jones Act. These aren’t shallow or self-interested endorsements, they are cases made by careful thinkers. Are there actually good reasons to support the Jones Act?

Show More

Recommended by
Recommendations from around the web and our community.

Very nice post arguing against the (sophisticated) defenders of the Jones Act. Jones Act doesn't subsidize a defense externality but instead cements in place monopoly. Partially self-recommending.

Excellent piece by @MTabarrok on the economics of the Jones Act.