upcarta
  • Sign In
  • Sign Up
  • Explore
  • Search

What Disqualifying Trump From the 2024 Ballot Would Mean for Election Law

  • Podcast episode
  • Nov 24, 2023
open.spotify.com
Listen on Spotify
79 min
1 Recommender
3 Mentions
2 Collections
In the past few weeks, there have been several notable developments in lawsuits seeking to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 election under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The... Show More

In the past few weeks, there have been several notable developments in lawsuits seeking to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 election under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The Minnesota Supreme Court dismissed a case against Trump but invited the petitioners to refile once Trump won the GOP nomination. A court in Michigan rejected a challenge to Trump's eligibility on the grounds that Congress, not the courts, should ultimately decide. And, most recently, a Colorado trial court held that, although Trump did engage in insurrection before and during Jan. 6, Section 3 does not apply to presidents.
As these and other cases make their way through the courts, and with the potential that the Supreme Court will at some point weight in, we're bringing you another portion of a conference held last month at the University of Minnesota Law School (for a previous excerpt, see the November 1 edition of the Lawfare Podcast). This panel, focusing on the interplay between the Section 3 challenges and election law, was moderated by University of Minnesota Law School Professor Nick Bednar, and featured Professor Ned Foley of the Ohio State College of Law, Professor Derek Muller of Notre Dame Law School, and Professor Andrea Katz of Washington University School of Law.
Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Show Less
Recommend
Post
Save
Complete
Collect
Mentions
See All
Jason Scott Montoya @JasonSMontoya · Nov 24, 2023
  • Post
What is true matters. If we act from a lie, that we think is true, we're still responsible. It is our responsibility to get the truth. "The fact that Jan 6 participants firmly believe that they were acting for the good of the country is not a defense to insurrection but is actually proof that they were acting from an insurrectionally public purpose."
Jason Scott Montoya @JasonSMontoya · Nov 24, 2023
  • Curated in Donald Trump Indictment Watch
Jason Scott Montoya @JasonSMontoya · Nov 24, 2023
  • Curated in USA: America's Crisis
Collections
See All
  • Jason Scott Montoya
    • Subcollection
    USA: America's Crisis
    30 curations
  • Jason Scott Montoya
    • Subcollection
    Donald Trump Indictment Watch
    45 curations
  • upcarta ©2025
  • Home
  • About
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • @upcarta