@engexplain @nntaleb 1/10 Science is assumed to be “evidence-based” but that term alone doesn’t mean much. What constitutes good evidence? How is evidence being used? Is it supporting or refuting a hypothesis? Was the hypothesis and experimental desi
- Tweet
- Jan 13, 2021
- #Philosophy of Science #Natural Science
Tweet
@engexplain @nntaleb 1/10
Science is assumed to be “evidence-based” but that term alone doesn’t mean much. What constitutes good evidence? How is evidence being used? Is it supporting or refuting a hypothesis? Was the hypothesis and experimental design predetermined or found ex post facto?
Science is assumed to be “evidence-based” but that term alone doesn’t mean much. What constitutes good evidence? How is evidence being used? Is it supporting or refuting a hypothesis? Was the hypothesis and experimental design predetermined or found ex post facto?
Recommended by
Recommendations from around the web and our community.
-
You might also be interested in
-
- Article
- By Scott Alexander
- May 20, 2022
-
- Podcast episode
- By Lorraine Daston
- May 8, 2022
-
- Article
- By José Luis Ricón Fernández de la Puente
- Apr 20, 2022
-
- Article
- By Stuart Ritchie
- Apr 18, 2022
-
- Podcast episode
- By Robert Breedlove
- Apr 3, 2022
Beautiful thread. Entropy it is.