What do you think?
Rate this book
A Field Guide to a Happy Life: 53 Brief Lessons for Living
A brilliant philosopher reimagines Stoicism for our modern age in this thought-provoking guide to a better life.
For more than two thousand years, Stoicism has offered a message of resilience in the face of hardship. Little wonder, then, that it is having such a revival in our own troubled times. But there is no denying how weird it can be: Is it really the case that we shouldn't care about our work, our loved ones, or our own lives? According to the old Stoics, yes.
In A Field Guide to a Happy Life, philosopher Massimo Pigliucci offers a renewed Stoicism that reflects modern science and sensibilities. Pigliucci embraces the joyful bonds of affection, the satisfactions of a job well done, and the grief that attends loss. In his hands, Stoicism isn't about feats of indifference, but about enduring pain without being overwhelmed, while enjoying pleasures without losing our heads. In short, he makes Stoicism into a philosophy all of us—whether committed Stoics or simply seekers—can use to live better.
For more than two thousand years, Stoicism has offered a message of resilience in the face of hardship. Little wonder, then, that it is having such a revival in our own troubled times. But there is no denying how weird it can be: Is it really the case that we shouldn't care about our work, our loved ones, or our own lives? According to the old Stoics, yes.
In A Field Guide to a Happy Life, philosopher Massimo Pigliucci offers a renewed Stoicism that reflects modern science and sensibilities. Pigliucci embraces the joyful bonds of affection, the satisfactions of a job well done, and the grief that attends loss. In his hands, Stoicism isn't about feats of indifference, but about enduring pain without being overwhelmed, while enjoying pleasures without losing our heads. In short, he makes Stoicism into a philosophy all of us—whether committed Stoics or simply seekers—can use to live better.
152 pages, Hardcover
First published September 15, 2020
158 people are currently reading
2980 people want to read
About the author
Massimo Pigliucci
82 books1,140 followersMassimo Pigliucci is an author, blogger, podcaster, as well as the K.D. Irani Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York.
His academic work is in evolutionary biology, philosophy of science, the nature of pseudoscience, and practical philosophy. His books include How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life (Basic Books) and Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (University of Chicago Press).
His new book is Beyond Stoicism: A Guide to the Good Life with Stoics, Skeptics, Epicureans, and Other Ancient Philosophers (The Experiment). More by Massimo at https://massimopigliucci.org.
His academic work is in evolutionary biology, philosophy of science, the nature of pseudoscience, and practical philosophy. His books include How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life (Basic Books) and Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (University of Chicago Press).
His new book is Beyond Stoicism: A Guide to the Good Life with Stoics, Skeptics, Epicureans, and Other Ancient Philosophers (The Experiment). More by Massimo at https://massimopigliucci.org.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 101 reviews
September 19, 2020
The Enchiridion (Handbook) of Epictetus stands as one of the most influential and concise presentations of Stoicism ever published. Written by Epictetus’s student Arrian in 135 CE (Epictetus wrote nothing down himself), the Enchiridion is a succinct summary of Epictetus’s core ethical teachings.
A Field Guide To a Happy Life is modern Stoic philosopher Massimo Pigliucci’s attempt at updating the Enchiridion for the twenty-first century. In addition to translating the text into contemporary language with updated, modern examples, Pigliucci has also updated the philosophy itself—particularly in regard to metaphysics—replacing the older Stoic view of the cosmos as purposefully ordered according to divine principles with the modern scientific understanding of the cosmos as devoid of any ultimate purpose.
Unlike some, I have no objections with Pigluicci modifying the doctrine because (1) the Enchiridion is not a sacred text, and (2) Stoicism is not a religion; as a practical philosophy, Stoicism must evolve with our changing scientific and moral knowledge to retain its relevance and usefulness. This is, in fact, how Stoicism was originally envisioned by the early Roman Stoics. As Seneca himself said:
“Will I not walk in the footsteps of my predecessors? I will indeed use the ancient road—but if I find another route that is more direct and has fewer ups and downs, I will stake out that one. Those who advance these doctrines before us are not our masters but our guides. The truth lies open to all; it has not yet been taken over. Much is left also for those yet to come.”
The Enchiridion, for all its brilliant insights into human psychology, does stand in need of updating due to its scientifically naive metaphysical assumptions. Pigliucci, in making these metaphysical updates (along with several others he outlines in the book), creates what he refers to as Stoicism 2.0—all while retaining the core ethical components of the philosophy.
For all of the controversy that Pigliucci is claiming this metaphysical alteration is creating, to my mind it makes little practical difference in terms of the core Stoic principles. As the philosopher John Sellers wrote:
“Whether one believes in a benevolent deity, pantheistic order or atomic chaos, it remains entirely up to us whether we choose to see an event as a disaster or an opportunity.”
While one can raise the question as to which doctrines can really be changed before the philosophy ceases to be Stoicism, I believe that as long as the core ethical concepts are retained, one’s metaphysical views are of relatively little importance, granted they retain an element of free will (otherwise everything is outside of one’s direct control, and the dichotomy of control is an illusion).
In terms of what cannot be changed, Pigliucci is right to propose that the dichotomy of control represents the foundation of Stoic thought. In reading through the Field Guide (and the Enchiridion), one realizes that every example is essentially an application or manifestation of this one core principle. There are things we fully control—thoughts, desires, judgements, goals, and actions—and things we do not: everything else. By focusing only on the first category, and by extension the development of our character and virtue, we can learn to live an ethical, tranquil, and eudaimonic life—regardless of our metaphysical picture of the universe (so long as it preserves an element of free will) and regardless of external circumstance.
The best way to think about Stoic practice and the dichotomy of control is through an analogy developed by Cicero. Cicero compared the practicing Stoic to an archer who does all she can to take the best shot but who (counterintuitively) does not concern herself with hitting the target. As Pigliucci wrote:
“Consider carefully what is and is not under the archer’s control. She is in complete charge of selecting and taking care of the bow and the arrows; of practicing shooting at a target; of selecting the precise moment in which to let the arrow go. After that, however, nothing is under her control: the target, an enemy soldier, say, may become aware of the arrow and move out of range; or a sudden gust of wind may ruin the most perfect shot.”
This is Stoicism in a nutshell. One can aim for any targets they’d like (e.g., a promotion at work), but instead of setting the promotion as one’s goal, the Stoic would instead internalize the goal and simply try to become the best employee they can be, one worthy of a promotion. In this sense the promotion is the target, becoming the best employee is the goal, and the promotion itself becomes a “preferred indifferent” that, because it is not in the individual’s complete control, is simply preferred but not desired. I will admit that Pigliucci does a better job than Epicteuts of explaining this, of showing the reader that externals do not need to be despised but are instead needed as targets to pursue for one to live a worthwhile life.
Once you understand this one core concept, and start putting it into practice every day, you can start to see the benefit of living according to Stoic principles. Not only does this mindset create a greater sense of tranquility, it also paradoxically makes it more likely that you will hit your targets when you emotionally distance yourself from them and focus only on the things within your direct control.
Finally, there is the question as to whether you should read Piggliucci’s Field Guide or Epictetus’s Enchiridion. The Enchiridion, unlike most works in the history of philosophy, is not a difficult read, by any stretch. It is short, concise, and easy to follow, and even though the examples are outdated, the reader would easily get the point Epictetus is trying to make. And while the metaphysics is outdated, there is nothing stopping the reader from doing exactly what Pigliucci is doing himself—picking and choosing what to accept, what to reject, and what to modify. That is, after all, the whole point of doing philosophy (and what separates philosophy from religion), thinking for oneself and not simply following the dictates of someone else’s reason.
In this sense, it may be more beneficial to go straight to the original material, and then to read Pigliucci’s Field Guide to make your own comparisons. I didn’t find any of his modifications to be objectionable, but the only way you can make that determination is through a comparison of the original material. Since both books are very short, it’s worth picking up both, as you could easily read them in one or two sittings.
A Field Guide To a Happy Life is modern Stoic philosopher Massimo Pigliucci’s attempt at updating the Enchiridion for the twenty-first century. In addition to translating the text into contemporary language with updated, modern examples, Pigliucci has also updated the philosophy itself—particularly in regard to metaphysics—replacing the older Stoic view of the cosmos as purposefully ordered according to divine principles with the modern scientific understanding of the cosmos as devoid of any ultimate purpose.
Unlike some, I have no objections with Pigluicci modifying the doctrine because (1) the Enchiridion is not a sacred text, and (2) Stoicism is not a religion; as a practical philosophy, Stoicism must evolve with our changing scientific and moral knowledge to retain its relevance and usefulness. This is, in fact, how Stoicism was originally envisioned by the early Roman Stoics. As Seneca himself said:
“Will I not walk in the footsteps of my predecessors? I will indeed use the ancient road—but if I find another route that is more direct and has fewer ups and downs, I will stake out that one. Those who advance these doctrines before us are not our masters but our guides. The truth lies open to all; it has not yet been taken over. Much is left also for those yet to come.”
The Enchiridion, for all its brilliant insights into human psychology, does stand in need of updating due to its scientifically naive metaphysical assumptions. Pigliucci, in making these metaphysical updates (along with several others he outlines in the book), creates what he refers to as Stoicism 2.0—all while retaining the core ethical components of the philosophy.
For all of the controversy that Pigliucci is claiming this metaphysical alteration is creating, to my mind it makes little practical difference in terms of the core Stoic principles. As the philosopher John Sellers wrote:
“Whether one believes in a benevolent deity, pantheistic order or atomic chaos, it remains entirely up to us whether we choose to see an event as a disaster or an opportunity.”
While one can raise the question as to which doctrines can really be changed before the philosophy ceases to be Stoicism, I believe that as long as the core ethical concepts are retained, one’s metaphysical views are of relatively little importance, granted they retain an element of free will (otherwise everything is outside of one’s direct control, and the dichotomy of control is an illusion).
In terms of what cannot be changed, Pigliucci is right to propose that the dichotomy of control represents the foundation of Stoic thought. In reading through the Field Guide (and the Enchiridion), one realizes that every example is essentially an application or manifestation of this one core principle. There are things we fully control—thoughts, desires, judgements, goals, and actions—and things we do not: everything else. By focusing only on the first category, and by extension the development of our character and virtue, we can learn to live an ethical, tranquil, and eudaimonic life—regardless of our metaphysical picture of the universe (so long as it preserves an element of free will) and regardless of external circumstance.
The best way to think about Stoic practice and the dichotomy of control is through an analogy developed by Cicero. Cicero compared the practicing Stoic to an archer who does all she can to take the best shot but who (counterintuitively) does not concern herself with hitting the target. As Pigliucci wrote:
“Consider carefully what is and is not under the archer’s control. She is in complete charge of selecting and taking care of the bow and the arrows; of practicing shooting at a target; of selecting the precise moment in which to let the arrow go. After that, however, nothing is under her control: the target, an enemy soldier, say, may become aware of the arrow and move out of range; or a sudden gust of wind may ruin the most perfect shot.”
This is Stoicism in a nutshell. One can aim for any targets they’d like (e.g., a promotion at work), but instead of setting the promotion as one’s goal, the Stoic would instead internalize the goal and simply try to become the best employee they can be, one worthy of a promotion. In this sense the promotion is the target, becoming the best employee is the goal, and the promotion itself becomes a “preferred indifferent” that, because it is not in the individual’s complete control, is simply preferred but not desired. I will admit that Pigliucci does a better job than Epicteuts of explaining this, of showing the reader that externals do not need to be despised but are instead needed as targets to pursue for one to live a worthwhile life.
Once you understand this one core concept, and start putting it into practice every day, you can start to see the benefit of living according to Stoic principles. Not only does this mindset create a greater sense of tranquility, it also paradoxically makes it more likely that you will hit your targets when you emotionally distance yourself from them and focus only on the things within your direct control.
Finally, there is the question as to whether you should read Piggliucci’s Field Guide or Epictetus’s Enchiridion. The Enchiridion, unlike most works in the history of philosophy, is not a difficult read, by any stretch. It is short, concise, and easy to follow, and even though the examples are outdated, the reader would easily get the point Epictetus is trying to make. And while the metaphysics is outdated, there is nothing stopping the reader from doing exactly what Pigliucci is doing himself—picking and choosing what to accept, what to reject, and what to modify. That is, after all, the whole point of doing philosophy (and what separates philosophy from religion), thinking for oneself and not simply following the dictates of someone else’s reason.
In this sense, it may be more beneficial to go straight to the original material, and then to read Pigliucci’s Field Guide to make your own comparisons. I didn’t find any of his modifications to be objectionable, but the only way you can make that determination is through a comparison of the original material. Since both books are very short, it’s worth picking up both, as you could easily read them in one or two sittings.
June 27, 2020
When I originally picked this book to read, I didn't know what to expect, but A Field Guide to a Happy Life: 53 Brief Lessons for Living did end up teaching me some new concepts I didn't know about. The main thing you should know about this book- if you haven't already done some research on it- is that it is about Stoicism.
Stoicism is a philosophy that is based on living a virtuous life as well as valuing wisdom. Although this book does mention that you can learn about Stoicism without prior knowledge, I did feel overwhelmed at times because of my ignorance on the topic. I was able to pick some things up regarding Stoic thought, this was done through examples, but there were times where I felt I was inundated with information, so I did not get a full grasp on the subject.
My suggestion is that if you are looking to learn more about Stoicism, that you also do some research before to get your feet wet, and then read this book in pieces so that you have plenty of time to reflect on the subject.
Stoicism is a philosophy that is based on living a virtuous life as well as valuing wisdom. Although this book does mention that you can learn about Stoicism without prior knowledge, I did feel overwhelmed at times because of my ignorance on the topic. I was able to pick some things up regarding Stoic thought, this was done through examples, but there were times where I felt I was inundated with information, so I did not get a full grasp on the subject.
My suggestion is that if you are looking to learn more about Stoicism, that you also do some research before to get your feet wet, and then read this book in pieces so that you have plenty of time to reflect on the subject.
July 21, 2023
„Seien Sie gut gelaunt, aber lachen Sie nicht zu viel oder zu laut. Sie sind kein Kind mehr, also verhalten Sie sich würdevoll.“
Muss das Buch abbrechen, es macht mich definitiv nicht glücklicher 😭🤣
Muss das Buch abbrechen, es macht mich definitiv nicht glücklicher 😭🤣
July 3, 2022
This is a insightful book about Stoicism. I've been following Stoicism for several years, but I wouldn't call myself a Stoic because there's a certain callousness about some Stoic teachings. This book explains that Stoicism is more about maintaining equanimity, which is a familiar word from my Buddhist readings. Equanimity is defined as mental calmness, composure, and evenness of temper, especially in a difficult situation. I still won't call myself a Stoic, or a Buddhist, but I see value in these philosophies.
February 27, 2021
Was ok, but did not live up to the expectations after reading his excellent "how to be a stoic"
March 12, 2022
Honestamente, ainda não sei ao certo o que sentir quanto a este livro. Devo admitir que pelo menos ao início tratou-se de uma boa leitura, mas no final acaba-se a leitura com um sentimento de é tudo mais do mesmo e sem conseguir retirar algo de útil do livro. Durante imensas vezes parecia que o escritor repetia-se, existiram imensos excertos que parecia estar em quase todos os textos. Para um livro pequeno, esperava algo mais direto ao ponto. Não temos discursos longos, mas temos sempre a mesma conversa que não nos leva a lugar nenhum.
É um tema importante, podia ter sido abordado de outra maneira. Na minha opinião não deveria ser um manual onde cada ensinamento acaba por ensinar o leitor o mesmo. São ensinamentos vazios de conteúdo, que acabamos por descobrir que afinal isto não é novidade. Já ouvimos isto em qualquer lado, apenas usaram outras palavras. Porém, é um livro bom para quem quer entrar no tema de estoicismo e aprender um pouco mais até sobre filosofia da vida.
Para mim não foi bem o que eu esperava. Um manual que deixa muito a desejar, podia ser muito mais desenvolvido.
É um tema importante, podia ter sido abordado de outra maneira. Na minha opinião não deveria ser um manual onde cada ensinamento acaba por ensinar o leitor o mesmo. São ensinamentos vazios de conteúdo, que acabamos por descobrir que afinal isto não é novidade. Já ouvimos isto em qualquer lado, apenas usaram outras palavras. Porém, é um livro bom para quem quer entrar no tema de estoicismo e aprender um pouco mais até sobre filosofia da vida.
Para mim não foi bem o que eu esperava. Um manual que deixa muito a desejar, podia ser muito mais desenvolvido.
September 24, 2020
A contemporary take on The Enchiridion of Epictetus
I like how the author was respectful of the spirit of the ancient text, without being bound by ancient social attitudes or prescientific beliefs about the world. When I read a book, there’s always an inner dialogue between myself and the author. I had the dialogue when reading Epictetus, and came away with a new clarity on what I believed: informed by him, but also informed by my values that I have developed in the last half century of reading and experience. In A Field Guide I have found a perspective on the material that I wish I could have wrote.
Thank you, Massimo Pigliucci! As an autodidactic amateur philosopher, I lack the technical skills and depth of knowledge to write this book. I am grateful you have done so!
I like how the author was respectful of the spirit of the ancient text, without being bound by ancient social attitudes or prescientific beliefs about the world. When I read a book, there’s always an inner dialogue between myself and the author. I had the dialogue when reading Epictetus, and came away with a new clarity on what I believed: informed by him, but also informed by my values that I have developed in the last half century of reading and experience. In A Field Guide I have found a perspective on the material that I wish I could have wrote.
Thank you, Massimo Pigliucci! As an autodidactic amateur philosopher, I lack the technical skills and depth of knowledge to write this book. I am grateful you have done so!
January 26, 2024
I found this to be a very practical and approachable introduction to Stoicism.
The book is based on Epictetus' Enchiridion and the author updates and explains the original texts to make them more understandable and also better match our modern world.
The book is based on Epictetus' Enchiridion and the author updates and explains the original texts to make them more understandable and also better match our modern world.
June 2, 2023
Good summary of Stoicism as a life philosophy with emphasis on the works of Epictetus; especially useful were the minor modifications at the end which makes the approach more helpful to modern audiences.
September 2, 2023
A primeira metade não foi má de todo, ainda consegui retirar algumas coisas da leitura, mas nem consegui acabar a segunda metade. Muito repetitivo e senti que existiam ideias sem pés nem cabeça, mas é só a minha opinião de acordo com as minhas vivências
December 14, 2021
I was thrilled with Massimo’s “How to be a Stoic”, so I had high hopes for this read. I was a bit disappointed. Halfway through the book I was thinking I would rate it 2 stars. I did find the final third of the book better and in my opinion lifted it to 3 stars.
January 13, 2021
I’ve read several versions of Epictetus’ classic Handbook, and this is the first time I’ve been able to say I thoroughly enjoyed it. Coincidentally, I was actually writing my own interpretation of this text to use in my personal meditations when I came across this new edition. Maybe I’m just too lazy, but I found Piggliucci’s version met all of my needs and I ended up setting aside my little project. But I digress, the point is that before I found this version, I was stumbling over archaic translations or struggling with cultural bias from millennia ago. This book was the solution to those problems.
For the first time I found myself reading not just a new translation but an exciting interpretation of the Enchiridion. For those readers familiar with virtue ethics, you aren’t going to find anything truly new here. The lessons are timeliness. The principles unchanging, however, it’s still an excellent reminder of how perception frames everything in this life.
At the end of the day, I think this one is a keeper. After a long day of work when I find myself a little overwhelmed with my day, a quick glance at a couple of pages reminds to focus on what I can control. I let go of pretty much everything weighing on my shoulders. After all, most of our pain and frustration are the result of wanting something that’s beyond our control. Once we understand that trap, we can avoid the headaches and disappointment we experience when things don’t go our way.
If you’re looking for an introduction to Stoicism or maybe just some Reason and Common Sense, here’s an excellent choice whether you’re gifting it to friends or adding it to your own collection. It’s light, fun and practical. So pick this one up at your local bookstore and tell me what you think.
For the first time I found myself reading not just a new translation but an exciting interpretation of the Enchiridion. For those readers familiar with virtue ethics, you aren’t going to find anything truly new here. The lessons are timeliness. The principles unchanging, however, it’s still an excellent reminder of how perception frames everything in this life.
At the end of the day, I think this one is a keeper. After a long day of work when I find myself a little overwhelmed with my day, a quick glance at a couple of pages reminds to focus on what I can control. I let go of pretty much everything weighing on my shoulders. After all, most of our pain and frustration are the result of wanting something that’s beyond our control. Once we understand that trap, we can avoid the headaches and disappointment we experience when things don’t go our way.
If you’re looking for an introduction to Stoicism or maybe just some Reason and Common Sense, here’s an excellent choice whether you’re gifting it to friends or adding it to your own collection. It’s light, fun and practical. So pick this one up at your local bookstore and tell me what you think.
February 2, 2021
This book is intended to be used as a vademecum, a handbook or guide that is kept constantly at hand for consultation. I won’t use it that way – I prefer the original, not his “Enchiridion 2.0,” mostly because I disagree with Pigliucci's assumption that Stoicism is incompatible with a life of faith. I think many of the ancient Stoics would have agreed with me on that, not to mention plenty of thoughtful people in today's world. Pigliucci's treatment of the Enchiridion is fine, up to his introduction of Stoicism 2.0, as he calls it.
IMHO, the new approach simply doesn't measure up to the thoughtful and inclusive quality of the original. I find much to ponder and think about in Pigliucci’s thoughts and insights regarding Stoicism (which mostly are actually Epictetus's thoughts and ideas), but as I noted above I’m disturbed by his rejection of most of ancient Stoicism that infers or allows for theological or spiritual consonance. I think he is letting his own atheism over-influence his views on Stoicism.
Several times, Pigliucci notes that the original Stoics never thought of Stoicism as a static, fully formed and unchangeable philosophy. They would have welcomed different approaches or ideas that were better. With that in mind, I recommend reading the original, not this Stoicism 2.0. I don't think it's better, I think it removes value from the original. Read the original, and then make whatever adjustments you think are necessary and important for you and your own situation.
IMHO, the new approach simply doesn't measure up to the thoughtful and inclusive quality of the original. I find much to ponder and think about in Pigliucci’s thoughts and insights regarding Stoicism (which mostly are actually Epictetus's thoughts and ideas), but as I noted above I’m disturbed by his rejection of most of ancient Stoicism that infers or allows for theological or spiritual consonance. I think he is letting his own atheism over-influence his views on Stoicism.
Several times, Pigliucci notes that the original Stoics never thought of Stoicism as a static, fully formed and unchangeable philosophy. They would have welcomed different approaches or ideas that were better. With that in mind, I recommend reading the original, not this Stoicism 2.0. I don't think it's better, I think it removes value from the original. Read the original, and then make whatever adjustments you think are necessary and important for you and your own situation.
September 19, 2020
I was so disappointed by this book that I had to return it to the seller. In the last year there is an effort to rediscover stoic philosophy and bring it to the modern people who desperately need some spiritual guidance. I have discovered many books that do an excellent job in bringing stoic philosophy closer to the everyday reader, but this book is going one step further and oversimplifies everything to the level that is not readable any more. Every one of the "lessons" is written without reference to how it was given to us by stoic philosophers and tries to move away from them and become food already processed and ready for fast consumption. You can get it if you need something to read in the bus or on the beach, but not when you want to stimulate your thinking. The last chapter on updating stoicism is maybe the only thing I found useful in the book but it was way too short so I was left with disappointment.
August 21, 2021
Fantastically useful. Massimo Pigliucci has updated the key lessons of Epictetus to be relevant to today's problems. This takes an important ancient school of philosophy and makes it easy to use and apply for everyone. He also does this without losing what is distinctive and interesting in Stoicism. There are other people reimagining Stoicism for rich entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley - this is for everyone else.
June 8, 2020
I enjoyed this useful (if somewhat repetitive) brief guide outlining the basics premises of the Stoic philosophy of Epictetus. The concepts are explained clearly and with gentle humour and, with study and practice, are simple--if not easy--to follow.
February 2, 2025
(2-Minute Read)
Massimo Pigliucci’s A Field Guide to a Happy Life: 53 Brief Lessons for Living is a modern reimagining of Epictetus’s Enchiridion, making ancient Stoic wisdom accessible to contemporary readers. For those on a Stoic journey—as I am—this book serves as an insightful companion, distilling core Stoic principles into practical lessons for modern life.
The book is structured around 53 short lessons, each offering a concise Stoic principle followed by a reflection on its modern application. Pigliucci explores key themes such as distinguishing what is within our control and what isn’t, how to cultivate inner freedom, and how to face adversity with resilience. In one particularly thought-provoking chapter, he reinterprets the Stoic idea of accepting fate, encouraging readers to actively shape their lives within the boundaries of what is possible rather than passively submitting to circumstances. Another lesson challenges the reader to rethink success, arguing that true happiness lies in living virtuously rather than chasing external rewards.
A particularly strong aspect of the book is how Pigliucci acknowledges and corrects certain moral shortcomings of ancient Stoicism. For example, Epictetus, a former slave, like many thinkers of his time, accepted slavery as part of the natural order. Pigliucci directly addresses this, emphasizing that while Stoic principles remain valuable, their ethical applications must evolve with our modern understanding of justice and human dignity.
Towards the end of the book, Pigliucci introduces his concept of Stoicism 2.0, an updated version of the philosophy adapted for twenty-first-century happiness. He refines classical Stoicism by softening its rigid acceptance of fate, advocating for a more proactive role in shaping our lives. He also challenges the ancient Stoic idea that emotions should always be subdued, instead arguing that cultivating healthy emotions—rather than suppressing them—leads to greater well-being. This bold update helps bridge the gap between ancient wisdom and modern moral values, making Stoicism more accessible to contemporary readers while still honoring its core tenets.
The book’s brevity can also be a limitation. While it distills Stoic wisdom effectively, some lessons feel overly condensed, missing the depth that a more extensive discussion might provide. Readers already familiar with Stoicism may find certain insights too simplified, whereas newcomers will likely appreciate the clear and digestible format.
Ultimately, A Field Guide to a Happy Life is a thoughtful and practical guide for anyone looking to apply Stoic philosophy to their daily lives. Pigliucci’s reinterpretation makes Stoicism more approachable, illuminating the path between ancient wisdom and contemporary challenges. Whether you’re seeking guidance on handling setbacks, redefining personal success, or finding tranquility in an unpredictable world, this book provides a modernized framework for cultivating resilience, clarity, and inner peace. While not a replacement for reading Epictetus directly, it is an excellent companion for those looking to incorporate Stoic wisdom into their everyday lives.
Rating: 4.5/5
Charles Francis, 02/02/2025
Massimo Pigliucci’s A Field Guide to a Happy Life: 53 Brief Lessons for Living is a modern reimagining of Epictetus’s Enchiridion, making ancient Stoic wisdom accessible to contemporary readers. For those on a Stoic journey—as I am—this book serves as an insightful companion, distilling core Stoic principles into practical lessons for modern life.
The book is structured around 53 short lessons, each offering a concise Stoic principle followed by a reflection on its modern application. Pigliucci explores key themes such as distinguishing what is within our control and what isn’t, how to cultivate inner freedom, and how to face adversity with resilience. In one particularly thought-provoking chapter, he reinterprets the Stoic idea of accepting fate, encouraging readers to actively shape their lives within the boundaries of what is possible rather than passively submitting to circumstances. Another lesson challenges the reader to rethink success, arguing that true happiness lies in living virtuously rather than chasing external rewards.
A particularly strong aspect of the book is how Pigliucci acknowledges and corrects certain moral shortcomings of ancient Stoicism. For example, Epictetus, a former slave, like many thinkers of his time, accepted slavery as part of the natural order. Pigliucci directly addresses this, emphasizing that while Stoic principles remain valuable, their ethical applications must evolve with our modern understanding of justice and human dignity.
Towards the end of the book, Pigliucci introduces his concept of Stoicism 2.0, an updated version of the philosophy adapted for twenty-first-century happiness. He refines classical Stoicism by softening its rigid acceptance of fate, advocating for a more proactive role in shaping our lives. He also challenges the ancient Stoic idea that emotions should always be subdued, instead arguing that cultivating healthy emotions—rather than suppressing them—leads to greater well-being. This bold update helps bridge the gap between ancient wisdom and modern moral values, making Stoicism more accessible to contemporary readers while still honoring its core tenets.
The book’s brevity can also be a limitation. While it distills Stoic wisdom effectively, some lessons feel overly condensed, missing the depth that a more extensive discussion might provide. Readers already familiar with Stoicism may find certain insights too simplified, whereas newcomers will likely appreciate the clear and digestible format.
Ultimately, A Field Guide to a Happy Life is a thoughtful and practical guide for anyone looking to apply Stoic philosophy to their daily lives. Pigliucci’s reinterpretation makes Stoicism more approachable, illuminating the path between ancient wisdom and contemporary challenges. Whether you’re seeking guidance on handling setbacks, redefining personal success, or finding tranquility in an unpredictable world, this book provides a modernized framework for cultivating resilience, clarity, and inner peace. While not a replacement for reading Epictetus directly, it is an excellent companion for those looking to incorporate Stoic wisdom into their everyday lives.
Rating: 4.5/5
Charles Francis, 02/02/2025
March 10, 2021
ما يمكنك التحكم به ...
.
.
بعض الأشياء متروكة لك تمامًا ، في حين أن الأشياء الأخرى ليست متروكة لك تمامًا. من المدهش أن ندرك ما يقع في كل فئة. يعود الأمر إليك تمامًا بأحكامك المدروسة ، وآرائك ، وأهدافك ، وقيمك المعتمدة ، وقراراتك بالتصرف أو عدم التصرف - أي في جوهرها ، ما تقرره بعد التفكير والمداولات.
لا يعود الأمر لك تمامًا في كل شيء آخر ، وخاصة جسمك ، وعلاقاتك ، وحياتك المهنية ، وسمعتك ، وثروتك - تبدو في جوهرها ، أنها أشياء يمكنك التأثير فيها ولكن نتائجها في الواقع تعتمد أيضًا على الآخرين.
كيف يكون هذا ممكنا؟
ألا يمكن للآخرين التأثير على آرائك وأحكامك ، وما إلى ذلك ، بينما يمكنك التأثير على حالة جسمك ، وعلاقاتك ، وما إلى ذلك؟ نعم إنه كذلك.
لكن في النهاية ، بالنسبة للفئة الأولى ، تكون المسؤولية عليك ؛ أما في الفئة الثانية ، تكون المسؤولية في مكان آخر. قد يؤثر الآخرون - أو حتى يحاولوا التلاعب - بآرائك ، أو يغيرون قيمك. ومع ذلك ، فإن آرائك وقيمك تبقى ملك لك. على العكس من ذلك ، يمكنك الاعتناء بجسمك ، ومع ذلك قد يؤدي وقوع حادث أو مرض إلى إصابتك بالشلل ؛ قد تحب الآخرين وقد لا يحبونك ؛ قد تفعل كل شيء بشكل صحيح في وظيفتك ومع ذلك تتعرض للطرد ؛ قد تكون شخصًا جيدًا ولكن سمعتك قد تتأذى من إشاعات خبيثة ؛ يمكنك التعامل مع أموالك بعناية ، ولكن قد ينهار السوق ويمحو ثروتك.
تذكر ، إذن ، أن الأشياء الوحيدة التي تخصك حقًا هي تلك التي تعود إليك تمامًا. كل شيء آخر هو على سبيل الإعارة من الكون ، وقد يتذكر الكون هذه القروض في أي لحظة ، بالعديد من الطرق. ويترتب على ذلك أنك إذا وضعت الكثير من الاهتمام في أشياء لا تعود إليك في النهاية ، فمن المؤكد أنك ستعاني ، وتحسد ، وتصاب بخيبة أمل ، وتعتمد بشكل عام على تقلبات الحظ. ومع ذلك ، إذا ركزت جهودك على ما هو متروك لك ، فسوف تمر بالحياة بهدوء ، ولا تحسد أي شخص أبدًا ، ولن تشعر بخيبة أمل أبدًا من تحول الكون.
مع الوقت والممارسة ، ستتمكن من تحقيق توازن حكيم بين الجهد الذي تبذله في التركيز على ما هو حقًا متروك لك وما هو ليس كذلك. يفضل الإنسان العلاقات المحببة ، والعمل الجيد ، والقليل من المال ، وكل ما تبقى ، لذلك في بداية التدريب ، سيكون من الصعب تحقيق هذا التوازن. لكن لا تستسلم لمجرد أنك تخطئ هنا وهناك. التقدم هو نتيجة للجهود المستمرة. مثلما لم يتم بناء روما في يوم واحد ، فإن تطوير نفسك إلى الأفضل يتطلب سنوات من الممارسة ، على الأرجح ، بقية السنوات المتبقية. ومع ذلك ، فإن هذا التقدم بالذات هو الضمان الوحيد المؤكد للحرية والسعادة.
إليك نصيحة مهمة: في كل مرة يكون لديك رغبة قوية في شيء ما (أو نفور قوي من شيء ما) ، درب نفسك على التحدث إلى مصدر تلك الرغبة (أو النفور) وقل : "أنت مجرد انطباع ، وقد لا تكون على الإطلاق كما تصور نفسك! اسمح لي أن ألقي نظرة فاحصة على الحقيقة "
ثم ضع الانطباع أمام الاختبار الحاسم واسأل نفسك ، هل الأمر متروك لك في النهاية أم لا؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، ركز كل مواردك عليه . إذا لم يكن الأمر كذلك ، إذاً لا يجب أن تربط إحساسك بقيمتك بذلك الأمر . من المعقول أنك تفضل أن تكون صحيح جسدياً ، وغنيًا ، ومحبوبًا ، وما إلى ذلك. لكن قيمتك كإنسان لا تعتمد على مثل هذه الأشياء. إذا حصلت عليها ، فلا بأس ؛ إذا لم يكن كذلك ، فلا بأس أيضًا. لا تبيع روحك بثمنٍ بخسٍ يا صديقي.
.
Massimo Pigliucci
A Field Guide To A Happy Life
Translated By #Maher_Razouk
.
.
بعض الأشياء متروكة لك تمامًا ، في حين أن الأشياء الأخرى ليست متروكة لك تمامًا. من المدهش أن ندرك ما يقع في كل فئة. يعود الأمر إليك تمامًا بأحكامك المدروسة ، وآرائك ، وأهدافك ، وقيمك المعتمدة ، وقراراتك بالتصرف أو عدم التصرف - أي في جوهرها ، ما تقرره بعد التفكير والمداولات.
لا يعود الأمر لك تمامًا في كل شيء آخر ، وخاصة جسمك ، وعلاقاتك ، وحياتك المهنية ، وسمعتك ، وثروتك - تبدو في جوهرها ، أنها أشياء يمكنك التأثير فيها ولكن نتائجها في الواقع تعتمد أيضًا على الآخرين.
كيف يكون هذا ممكنا؟
ألا يمكن للآخرين التأثير على آرائك وأحكامك ، وما إلى ذلك ، بينما يمكنك التأثير على حالة جسمك ، وعلاقاتك ، وما إلى ذلك؟ نعم إنه كذلك.
لكن في النهاية ، بالنسبة للفئة الأولى ، تكون المسؤولية عليك ؛ أما في الفئة الثانية ، تكون المسؤولية في مكان آخر. قد يؤثر الآخرون - أو حتى يحاولوا التلاعب - بآرائك ، أو يغيرون قيمك. ومع ذلك ، فإن آرائك وقيمك تبقى ملك لك. على العكس من ذلك ، يمكنك الاعتناء بجسمك ، ومع ذلك قد يؤدي وقوع حادث أو مرض إلى إصابتك بالشلل ؛ قد تحب الآخرين وقد لا يحبونك ؛ قد تفعل كل شيء بشكل صحيح في وظيفتك ومع ذلك تتعرض للطرد ؛ قد تكون شخصًا جيدًا ولكن سمعتك قد تتأذى من إشاعات خبيثة ؛ يمكنك التعامل مع أموالك بعناية ، ولكن قد ينهار السوق ويمحو ثروتك.
تذكر ، إذن ، أن الأشياء الوحيدة التي تخصك حقًا هي تلك التي تعود إليك تمامًا. كل شيء آخر هو على سبيل الإعارة من الكون ، وقد يتذكر الكون هذه القروض في أي لحظة ، بالعديد من الطرق. ويترتب على ذلك أنك إذا وضعت الكثير من الاهتمام في أشياء لا تعود إليك في النهاية ، فمن المؤكد أنك ستعاني ، وتحسد ، وتصاب بخيبة أمل ، وتعتمد بشكل عام على تقلبات الحظ. ومع ذلك ، إذا ركزت جهودك على ما هو متروك لك ، فسوف تمر بالحياة بهدوء ، ولا تحسد أي شخص أبدًا ، ولن تشعر بخيبة أمل أبدًا من تحول الكون.
مع الوقت والممارسة ، ستتمكن من تحقيق توازن حكيم بين الجهد الذي تبذله في التركيز على ما هو حقًا متروك لك وما هو ليس كذلك. يفضل الإنسان العلاقات المحببة ، والعمل الجيد ، والقليل من المال ، وكل ما تبقى ، لذلك في بداية التدريب ، سيكون من الصعب تحقيق هذا التوازن. لكن لا تستسلم لمجرد أنك تخطئ هنا وهناك. التقدم هو نتيجة للجهود المستمرة. مثلما لم يتم بناء روما في يوم واحد ، فإن تطوير نفسك إلى الأفضل يتطلب سنوات من الممارسة ، على الأرجح ، بقية السنوات المتبقية. ومع ذلك ، فإن هذا التقدم بالذات هو الضمان الوحيد المؤكد للحرية والسعادة.
إليك نصيحة مهمة: في كل مرة يكون لديك رغبة قوية في شيء ما (أو نفور قوي من شيء ما) ، درب نفسك على التحدث إلى مصدر تلك الرغبة (أو النفور) وقل : "أنت مجرد انطباع ، وقد لا تكون على الإطلاق كما تصور نفسك! اسمح لي أن ألقي نظرة فاحصة على الحقيقة "
ثم ضع الانطباع أمام الاختبار الحاسم واسأل نفسك ، هل الأمر متروك لك في النهاية أم لا؟ إذا كانت الإجابة بنعم ، ركز كل مواردك عليه . إذا لم يكن الأمر كذلك ، إذاً لا يجب أن تربط إحساسك بقيمتك بذلك الأمر . من المعقول أنك تفضل أن تكون صحيح جسدياً ، وغنيًا ، ومحبوبًا ، وما إلى ذلك. لكن قيمتك كإنسان لا تعتمد على مثل هذه الأشياء. إذا حصلت عليها ، فلا بأس ؛ إذا لم يكن كذلك ، فلا بأس أيضًا. لا تبيع روحك بثمنٍ بخسٍ يا صديقي.
.
Massimo Pigliucci
A Field Guide To A Happy Life
Translated By #Maher_Razouk
Read
May 16, 2021Good human life is one that is lived by applying reason to the betterment of society
Stoics believed that women’s intellectual capacities were equal to those of men
DO NOT DEMAND THAT THINGS happen in the way you want them to happen. The universe does not owe you anything
Cultivate an attitude of equanimity toward externals. Be glad and appreciate when they work in your favor; don’t get mad when they don’t
For anything that happens to you, you will find the resources within you to deal with it
Never regard anything as truly yours, but as on loan from the universe
Some wine is spilled on you. Do not get upset. Instead, say to yourself, “This is the small price I pay in order to keep my inner peace and harmony with others.”
IF YOU WISH TO MAKE progress, be happy to be considered clumsy or foolish by others
Accept that your children, your companion, your friends, and indeed yourself are not going to live forever
Touch everything lightly, enjoy it while it is within your reach, and do not regret it when it is gone
It is not up to you if you are born rich or poor, smart or somewhat dense, handsome or ugly. But it is very much up to you to make the best of it
DON’T BE SUPERSTITIOUS. YOU CANNOT read your future in signs from the stars, cards, tea leaves, or psychics.
You should not desire to be famous, rich, or powerful, but to be free
SOMEONE HAS INSULTED YOU? What they say is just air moving between the two of you. Their words become an insult only if you regard them as such
MEDITATE FREQUENTLY ON ADVERSITY, AND especially on death, which will reach everyone
NOTHING IN THE WORLD IS evil or good. The world just is. It is up to us to decide what to do with whatever comes our way
Be sympathetic and do not berate them for their mistaken impressions
When you are engaged in conversation, make a point of not talking too much about yourself
Most of the time, simply abstaining from judgment will actually be the better course.
DON’T EVEN THINK OF CALLING yourself wise, or enlightened. Instead, act according to what you’ve learned. That will be far more impressive
Next time you are thirsty, take some cold water into your mouth, then spit it out. But without telling anyone
Don’t criticize anyone, don’t praise anyone, don’t blame anyone. When someone compliments you, smile instead of feeling flattered; when someone criticizes you, accept the criticism in good spirit
The only thing to be proud of is your practice, day after day
The right thing to do is to live as a human being—which means as one who uses the faculty of reason to improve society
Stoics believed that women’s intellectual capacities were equal to those of men
DO NOT DEMAND THAT THINGS happen in the way you want them to happen. The universe does not owe you anything
Cultivate an attitude of equanimity toward externals. Be glad and appreciate when they work in your favor; don’t get mad when they don’t
For anything that happens to you, you will find the resources within you to deal with it
Never regard anything as truly yours, but as on loan from the universe
Some wine is spilled on you. Do not get upset. Instead, say to yourself, “This is the small price I pay in order to keep my inner peace and harmony with others.”
IF YOU WISH TO MAKE progress, be happy to be considered clumsy or foolish by others
Accept that your children, your companion, your friends, and indeed yourself are not going to live forever
Touch everything lightly, enjoy it while it is within your reach, and do not regret it when it is gone
It is not up to you if you are born rich or poor, smart or somewhat dense, handsome or ugly. But it is very much up to you to make the best of it
DON’T BE SUPERSTITIOUS. YOU CANNOT read your future in signs from the stars, cards, tea leaves, or psychics.
You should not desire to be famous, rich, or powerful, but to be free
SOMEONE HAS INSULTED YOU? What they say is just air moving between the two of you. Their words become an insult only if you regard them as such
MEDITATE FREQUENTLY ON ADVERSITY, AND especially on death, which will reach everyone
NOTHING IN THE WORLD IS evil or good. The world just is. It is up to us to decide what to do with whatever comes our way
Be sympathetic and do not berate them for their mistaken impressions
When you are engaged in conversation, make a point of not talking too much about yourself
Most of the time, simply abstaining from judgment will actually be the better course.
DON’T EVEN THINK OF CALLING yourself wise, or enlightened. Instead, act according to what you’ve learned. That will be far more impressive
Next time you are thirsty, take some cold water into your mouth, then spit it out. But without telling anyone
Don’t criticize anyone, don’t praise anyone, don’t blame anyone. When someone compliments you, smile instead of feeling flattered; when someone criticizes you, accept the criticism in good spirit
The only thing to be proud of is your practice, day after day
The right thing to do is to live as a human being—which means as one who uses the faculty of reason to improve society
July 29, 2021
First of all - I am by no means a Stoic scholar, just an interested layperson. So please excuse me for any uninformed ideas in this review.
What I liked in Pigliucci's version: Pigliucci debunks William Irvine's rehash of the main Stoic argument.
(Irvine somehow changes the Stoic dichotomy of control into a trichotomy, telling you that you have PARTIAL control over some things). Pigliucci has helped me quite a bit, as I was always kept wondering where my own influence stops in these cases (and me secretly thinking I had just not tried hard enough... which often left me sad and frustrated, which is VERY non-stoic!).
What I disliked in Pigliucci's version: Pigliucci seems to be quite materialistic, and tries to convince us that it is okay to strive for external things (i.e. things like your health, wealth etc.) - as long as you stay level-headed if the desired outcome is not reached. Well I'm sorry to say my Stoic practice is not that far developed that I don't feel deflated if, after putting a lot of effort in, this effort does not pay off. It's a lot easier not to strive for things out of my control in the first place.
Unfortunately, the original text (or translation thereof) of the Enchiridion by Epictetus this book is based upon, is not included in this book.
So unless you know that text pretty well, you're basically kept guessing.
Overall tip - if you're relatively new to Stoicism, I would recommend reading two other books first:
- Pigliucci's excellent 'how to be a Stoic' for a modern day introduction to Stoicism
- Sharon Lebell's wonderful translation/interpretation of the original text by Epictetus, titled 'the art of living'.
What I liked in Pigliucci's version: Pigliucci debunks William Irvine's rehash of the main Stoic argument.
(Irvine somehow changes the Stoic dichotomy of control into a trichotomy, telling you that you have PARTIAL control over some things). Pigliucci has helped me quite a bit, as I was always kept wondering where my own influence stops in these cases (and me secretly thinking I had just not tried hard enough... which often left me sad and frustrated, which is VERY non-stoic!).
What I disliked in Pigliucci's version: Pigliucci seems to be quite materialistic, and tries to convince us that it is okay to strive for external things (i.e. things like your health, wealth etc.) - as long as you stay level-headed if the desired outcome is not reached. Well I'm sorry to say my Stoic practice is not that far developed that I don't feel deflated if, after putting a lot of effort in, this effort does not pay off. It's a lot easier not to strive for things out of my control in the first place.
Unfortunately, the original text (or translation thereof) of the Enchiridion by Epictetus this book is based upon, is not included in this book.
So unless you know that text pretty well, you're basically kept guessing.
Overall tip - if you're relatively new to Stoicism, I would recommend reading two other books first:
- Pigliucci's excellent 'how to be a Stoic' for a modern day introduction to Stoicism
- Sharon Lebell's wonderful translation/interpretation of the original text by Epictetus, titled 'the art of living'.
August 3, 2024
Quite disappointing.
The only good aspect of it was its brevity and was able to get through it quickly.
It worked in parts but largely didnt as found self disagreeing alot with it.
Didn't like the writing style nor the said interpretation of the philosophy. Felt more like Jay Shetty type of book. Says something good about 1 of 9 times. It's regurgitated from some of the best and not done well.
Eg, don't discriminate or judge. It's an ideal thought, however the brain is does that regardless unconsciously. Else we would not be able to function in day to day life. It is necessary to prioritise.
It also goes in contradiction with another principle which is to choose your company wisely. If all are the same, isint that discriminating by choosing only to be around a few instead? There is a need to discriminate else such a person would consider being with a drug dealer the equivalent of being with a nun.
Another such example one was, dont be proud of just reading but of implementing, okay but to get started small steps are necessary and do need to pat self on back to improve. Moreover, being proud is also something that shouldn't allow to feel enough of as per this.
This advice is too general, too simplified and too basic to implement well. Luxurious idealisms rather than practical and realistically based.
There is a certain balance and nuance that needs to be expressed with these which just aren't done well enough. This results in something that feels hokey.
It's a 2/5 purely due to being based on the topic.
The only good aspect of it was its brevity and was able to get through it quickly.
It worked in parts but largely didnt as found self disagreeing alot with it.
Didn't like the writing style nor the said interpretation of the philosophy. Felt more like Jay Shetty type of book. Says something good about 1 of 9 times. It's regurgitated from some of the best and not done well.
Eg, don't discriminate or judge. It's an ideal thought, however the brain is does that regardless unconsciously. Else we would not be able to function in day to day life. It is necessary to prioritise.
It also goes in contradiction with another principle which is to choose your company wisely. If all are the same, isint that discriminating by choosing only to be around a few instead? There is a need to discriminate else such a person would consider being with a drug dealer the equivalent of being with a nun.
Another such example one was, dont be proud of just reading but of implementing, okay but to get started small steps are necessary and do need to pat self on back to improve. Moreover, being proud is also something that shouldn't allow to feel enough of as per this.
This advice is too general, too simplified and too basic to implement well. Luxurious idealisms rather than practical and realistically based.
There is a certain balance and nuance that needs to be expressed with these which just aren't done well enough. This results in something that feels hokey.
It's a 2/5 purely due to being based on the topic.
December 13, 2020
A modern take on Epictetus' stoicism. This book summarizes the teachings and ruminations with clear prose and relevant examples. Furthermore, it offers a revision by abstracting away some of the archaic notions like divine foundations, slavery, gender discrimination, emphasis on procreative sex and so on. Epictetus was a product of his time, but despite these flaws, there is a treasure trove of wisdom here.
The central idea is an appeal shifting the focus from externals (the things that we can't truly control) to internals (the things which we can like our judgements and overt behavior). Epictetus argues that the primary source of personal unhappiness is the amount of stock we might put on the externals. Since they are bound to have their own stochastic whim, we are left with dissatisfaction or sadness when things don't go our preferred way. So instead of pursuing the goal of hitting an archery target, one should pursue the goal of putting one's best possible effort. The former can be affected by a gust of wind and doesn't offer a good yardstick for virtue like the latter does.
Stoic philosophy resonates with me, and difficult as it may be to practice, I am trying to learn more about it. The book also has a fairly informative bibliography for further exploration, and I'd recommend it to almost anyone as a good introduction to the subject.
The central idea is an appeal shifting the focus from externals (the things that we can't truly control) to internals (the things which we can like our judgements and overt behavior). Epictetus argues that the primary source of personal unhappiness is the amount of stock we might put on the externals. Since they are bound to have their own stochastic whim, we are left with dissatisfaction or sadness when things don't go our preferred way. So instead of pursuing the goal of hitting an archery target, one should pursue the goal of putting one's best possible effort. The former can be affected by a gust of wind and doesn't offer a good yardstick for virtue like the latter does.
Stoic philosophy resonates with me, and difficult as it may be to practice, I am trying to learn more about it. The book also has a fairly informative bibliography for further exploration, and I'd recommend it to almost anyone as a good introduction to the subject.
December 14, 2020
A contemporary philosopher looks at the stoicism of Epictetus and updates it for a contemporary audience. There is much benefit to be derived from these pages (for example, the importance of differentiating between things we can control -- our opinions, our motivations, our desires, etc. -- and those we cannot -- our bodies, our property, our reputation -- and how focusing on the former, rather than the latter, can lead to a happier life), and I enjoyed reading and thinking about the various points both Epictetus and Professor Pigliucci make. But statements such as "Nothing in the world is evil or, for that matter, good. The world just is. It is up to use to decide what to do with whatever comes our way," leads me to the conclusion that neither philosopher seems to believe in Absolute Truth or, ultimately, God, and, while I find value in many of the insights, as a Christian, I cannot endorse the conclusions drawn...and, as a result, really cannot recommend this book. (It's at least short and pithy, though!)
December 29, 2024
Thank you Massimo! This handbook will take Stoicism into 2025 and beyond
As 2023 turned into 2024 this 59 year old felt a few pieces of my life's puzzle were missing.
As a newly retired educator I was in need of direction. Golf alone was not cutting it! I was watching the movie the holdovers and meditations came up. Stoicism was popping up in popular media and I became intrigued.
I found a copy of Pigliucci's, How to Be a stoic. It was an amazing read that had such positive and fulfilling affect on my life. Massimo's words opened a new world for me!
Its almost 2025, and I've covered a lot of books this year. I saved this field guide for the end of the year. I'm glad I did. I have read 4 versions of the enchiridion this year. It should be required reading for all. In this readers opinion, a field guide for a happy life is the most accessible and most relevant for 2025! Here is to more reading and learning in the new year!
As 2023 turned into 2024 this 59 year old felt a few pieces of my life's puzzle were missing.
As a newly retired educator I was in need of direction. Golf alone was not cutting it! I was watching the movie the holdovers and meditations came up. Stoicism was popping up in popular media and I became intrigued.
I found a copy of Pigliucci's, How to Be a stoic. It was an amazing read that had such positive and fulfilling affect on my life. Massimo's words opened a new world for me!
Its almost 2025, and I've covered a lot of books this year. I saved this field guide for the end of the year. I'm glad I did. I have read 4 versions of the enchiridion this year. It should be required reading for all. In this readers opinion, a field guide for a happy life is the most accessible and most relevant for 2025! Here is to more reading and learning in the new year!
July 6, 2025
A Field Guide to a Happy Life: 53 Brief Lessons for Living is a short book that serves as an introduction to the Stoic lifestyle. The book moves quickly through all 53 life lessons, translated into a modern context.
Many of these lessons come down to common sense and simply functioning well in life, as long as you don’t let yourself get too annoyed by your surroundings. If this is already your way of living and you have the mindset of “live and let live,” then the Stoic lifestyle will be very natural for you. And I know the book is right. After all, why get angry about situations you can no longer change? Focus on the present moment and on what you can influence. It actually sounds a bit like Yoda from Star Wars: “Do or do not. There is no try.”
It’s a nice, quick book that’s easy to listen to. However, I did have to rewind it several times because it’s not the best book to play while driving. You really need to keep your mind on it.
Many of these lessons come down to common sense and simply functioning well in life, as long as you don’t let yourself get too annoyed by your surroundings. If this is already your way of living and you have the mindset of “live and let live,” then the Stoic lifestyle will be very natural for you. And I know the book is right. After all, why get angry about situations you can no longer change? Focus on the present moment and on what you can influence. It actually sounds a bit like Yoda from Star Wars: “Do or do not. There is no try.”
It’s a nice, quick book that’s easy to listen to. However, I did have to rewind it several times because it’s not the best book to play while driving. You really need to keep your mind on it.
April 10, 2021
53 practical lessons (each about one page each) by Epictectures reinteprated by philosopher Pigliucci, who also elaborates on the four cardinal virtues of stoicism and Epictetus' three disciplinary actions. The main objective of stoicism is to focus on what we can control (internal things) rather than what we can't control (external things) - this seems self-evident, but in fact isn't.
I'm not sure yet if I agree with Pigliucci's dichotomy of control or tend towards Irvine's trichotomy of control more. I'll be reading Irvine's ''A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy'' next and I'm curious to find out about his takes on stoicism.
Either way, this was pretty much the first book I read on stoicism. It's a decent book. Not to hard to grasp (and hence great for people like me who aren't yet very familiar with stoicism). Easy to digest.
I'm not sure yet if I agree with Pigliucci's dichotomy of control or tend towards Irvine's trichotomy of control more. I'll be reading Irvine's ''A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy'' next and I'm curious to find out about his takes on stoicism.
Either way, this was pretty much the first book I read on stoicism. It's a decent book. Not to hard to grasp (and hence great for people like me who aren't yet very familiar with stoicism). Easy to digest.
August 21, 2021
A short read, very well structured. Author doesn't waste your time and gives you what you came for which is very refreshing when you are used to self-help meaningless anecdotes and examples that just fluff out the book.
As for the content. It's interesting but I think it takes a few assumptions for granted that are very important. For example the argument that a virtuous life will actually make you happy. There's some good techniques for handling your judgements and emotions but as it often feels to me, stoicism often boils down to "Just make yourself feel different" in a lot of examples, which I never found that useful.
Still I think this book gives a useful framework for how to live modern version of a virtuous Stoic life in a very straightforward way with an obviously well read perspective behind it. Which is very valuable.
As for the content. It's interesting but I think it takes a few assumptions for granted that are very important. For example the argument that a virtuous life will actually make you happy. There's some good techniques for handling your judgements and emotions but as it often feels to me, stoicism often boils down to "Just make yourself feel different" in a lot of examples, which I never found that useful.
Still I think this book gives a useful framework for how to live modern version of a virtuous Stoic life in a very straightforward way with an obviously well read perspective behind it. Which is very valuable.
August 1, 2020
Massimo Pigliucci and his Field guide to a happy life presents Stoicism for modern times. He shows us how to adopt Stoic philosophy as our compass to live a life worth living.
We all know stoics Marcus Aurelius and Seneca, here author mostly focuses on Epictetus's teachings.
First section of the book is meant as general introduction to Stoicism and to Epictetus.
Central and crucial section comprises fifty-three units, each paralleling a similar unit of original manual with relatable examples to our times.
Third section is a summary of how modern Stoicism diverges from "original", keeping in mind that Stoicism has been altered constantly through time.
Very useful book, I love it.
We all know stoics Marcus Aurelius and Seneca, here author mostly focuses on Epictetus's teachings.
First section of the book is meant as general introduction to Stoicism and to Epictetus.
Central and crucial section comprises fifty-three units, each paralleling a similar unit of original manual with relatable examples to our times.
Third section is a summary of how modern Stoicism diverges from "original", keeping in mind that Stoicism has been altered constantly through time.
Very useful book, I love it.
September 23, 2020
Interesting. Philosophical modern language discussion of Stoicism as it can be applied to modern living. I found some (to me anyway) surprising elements that seemed like Buddhism.... I especially like Pigliucci's metaphors -- comparing it with an animal with Logic as the bones, ethics the flesh and Physics the soul or even better the egg metaphor. Philosophy as a fertile field, logic being the fene, ethics the crop and physics the soil.
His touching on the universal web of cause-effect, which is in agreement with science was something also believed by the Stoics another touching point with Buddhism
And the idea that the cosmos is permeated by a single substance, ( the peruma) or breath that is common to everything. Interesting read, quite a bit of depth is this small volume.
His touching on the universal web of cause-effect, which is in agreement with science was something also believed by the Stoics another touching point with Buddhism
And the idea that the cosmos is permeated by a single substance, ( the peruma) or breath that is common to everything. Interesting read, quite a bit of depth is this small volume.
January 10, 2021
Pigliucci is rapidly turning himself into one of the most prominent modern advocates of Stoicism, which has undergone something of a a renaissance over the past decade. This is a rewriting of the Enchridion (Handbook) by Epictetus, interpreting it for a modern audience. If you've already read a straight translation there's not much here that's extra beyond Pigliucci stripping out references to slavery and some of the elements of Stoic metaphysics that aren't compatible with modern scientific understanding. If you want more detail then read his book How to be a Stoic, but this is intended to be a useful handbook to have with you to check in on for reminders and reinforcement on how to best approach everyday life.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 101 reviews