Digital List Price: | $7.99 |
Kindle Price: | $6.99 Save $1.00 (13%) |
Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic. By way of clarification and supplement to my last book Beyond Good and Evil (Oxford World's Classics) 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
On the Genealogy of Morals (1887) is a book about the history of ethics and about interpretation. Nietzsche rewrites the former as a history of cruelty, exposing the central values of the Judaeo-Christian and liberal traditions - compassion, equality, justice - as the product of a brutal process of conditioning designed to domesticate the animal vitality of earlier cultures. The result is a book which raises profoundly disquieting issues about the violence of both ethics and
interpretation. Nietzsche questions moral certainties by showing that religion and science have no claim to absolute truth, before turning on his own arguments in order to call their very presuppositions into question.
The Genealogy is the most sustained of Nietzsche's later works and offers one of the fullest expressions of his characteristic concerns. This edition places his ideas within the cultural context of his own time and stresses the relevance of his work for a contemporary audience.
ABOUT THE SERIES: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the widest range of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, helpful notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.
- ISBN-13978-0199537082
- Edition1st
- PublisherOUP Oxford
- Publication dateNovember 5, 1998
- LanguageEnglish
- File size706 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B006RQ1082
- Publisher : OUP Oxford; 1st edition (November 5, 1998)
- Publication date : November 5, 1998
- Language : English
- File size : 706 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 158 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #659,688 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #156 in History of Philosophy & Schools of Thought eBooks
- #902 in Ethics & Morality
- #2,983 in Philosophy of Ethics & Morality
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
This work was written as a “companion” of sorts to Nietzsche’s "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" and "Beyond Good and Evil". Supposedly, the philosopher would be more direct in his ideas here, this book being frequently mentioned as a good intro to his opinions. While indeed the book seems more direct, it has not the clearer presentation so often mentioned. Nietzsche’s style relies heavily on analogies and his prose is convoluted, showing a technique heavily geared towards declamation. Despite this not being an exclusive of this work, I’ve felt that Nietzsche is much more economical in trying to expound on his ideas here than in "Beyond Good and Evil", for instance, spending a greater deal of time disparaging against his numerous philosophical adversaries. What we are left with is a book that rarely hits the spot, is very confusing to read due to stylistic choices and requires you to bear a lot of gratuitous ranting.
I don’t feel very confident to criticize the validity of Nietzsche’s thesis, but I was left with an impression that some of his premises are weak at best. However, whenever he can get a hold of his anger and write in a clearer form (though this is not as frequent as one would want), he asks very interesting questions and provides nice interpretations. One can see the reach of the questions he asks in numerous fields: his views on the <i>ressentiment</i> and how this can generate traumas (somewhat an embryo to Freud’s psychoanalysis), his broad study of morals and culture being something determined by a dominating class as means to validate it (something developed in depth by the Neo Marxists and the Frankfurt School), his arguments against an intellectual ascetic class, science being a new religion, etc.
Nonetheless, it seems to me that his work relies heavily on the hypothesis that any suppression of instinct by mankind is inherently negative, providing little justification to this. When he does it, the argument has a very shallow, somewhat Social Darwinistic tone. Another pillar for his critique, his etymological interpretation of words, seems like a longshot, with cherrypicked examples and extrapolations. Additionally, this argument ends up contradicting his own position that “culture changes to accommodate the meaning of certain segments of society”: if so, how can we hope to accurately derive objective meanings of words from the original connotations of them? Despite framing many of his premises as the views of an individual of another time (much like his frequent misogynist views), I wondered how much this reduces the validity of his conclusions.
As a final criticism, this is the first work of Nietzsche I’ve read after getting familiar with some of Rene Girard’s work and I must say that his arguments on the anthropological role of Christianity weaken enormously the efforts of Nietzsche: I’ve caught myself repeatedly going through his confusing arguments and unraveling them through Girard’s mimetic theory. What surprised me the most is how Nietzsche laid very carefully all the elements of the “mimetic cycle” but always went with a grandiloquent argument favoring violence and primordial aggression of the pagan societies.
Nietzsche begins by exploring the 'ascetic priest', defined as the prophets, seers and priests of all civilisations, discussing the ancient Brahmins of India and the Christian priest, Nietzsche sees the 'ascetic priest' as 'liars' and who created stories and fables and concepts such as that of morality and God.
Yet Nietzsche argues that these 'ascetic priests' acted with profound compassion when crafting these sacred stories, these supposed 'lies'. He describes the 'ascetic priest' as akin to a doctor who attempts to heal the sickness of humanity. That sickness that arises when man realises the meaninglessness of existence, the ephemerality of life, when he suffers injustices and horrors, disease and injury, death and loss, pain and misery, he sees these all as the afflictions inevitable to the human condition.
Yet conversely Nietzsche infact argues that these 'ascetic priests' were the wisest and greatest of all men, for they dared to peer into the 'Abyss' itself, they saw the meaninglessness of existence, they dared to stare into the Void and in doing so they felt the immensity of dread at the realisation of the absence of a true purpose, meaning, surety or God. Thus they themselves set about inventing God/Higher Reality/Absolute/Truth, they crafted sacred stories, and teachings of compassion and justice. Because as Nietzsche describes they truly felt deep compassion for humanity and seeing its suffering. Religion and morality were the best 'drug' to help humanity cope with this frightening realisation, sacred stories, moral injunctions of being just and kind and compassionate arose according to Nietzsche because they allowed humans to feel some power over others, that doing of good or giving to charity was the 'drug' that made them feel joy a sense of being able to change reality even briefly or in small instances. Hence did those ancient priests craft religion and morality to remedy humanity's symptomatic suicidal tendency at recognising the absence of meaning in the world. The 'ascetic priest' hence lied from a place of compassion and love, he saw that he must save humanity from losing the 'The Will' to life, he must give it a higher meaning, a sense of purpose and framework in which to operate. The 'ascetic priest' would thus become the saviour of humanity, he would take the burden upon his shoulders to vanquish suffering, by waging a war against meaninglessness by creating meaning. His prayers, his teachings and his concept of 'God' soothed the sick souls, giving them hope and purpose, joy and compassion, justice and integrity.
Like a doctor prescribing placebos, the effects worked, humanity felt joy and compassion and a 'Will' to life sprouted.
Nietzsche heavily praises ancient India and it's Brahmin ascetic priests in many verses, emphasising their ability to see the suffering of humanity and remedy it, he sees their ascetic renunciation of the world as being steeped in a deep sense of compassion to feel the pain of the masses, to suffer the suffering of people below them and be moved to a profound compassion. Yet he criticises the ascetic ideal as itself self contradictory as it seeks to affirm life by denying it, by suppressing it. He sees this ideal as reaching its extreme conclusions in Christian 'slave' morality, which he so despised, an ideal taken to the extreme that destroys and can lead to the regression of humanity through a narcotic haze of delusion.
Nietzsche ends his third essay by stating that the Atheist is in a sense the most 'honest' of the 'ascetic priests' for he can lie no longer and admits to the final lie, the lie of God. Nietzsche often attacks Christianity and Judaism, seeing the Abrahamic religions as overly concerned with 'anasthetising' suffering and conversely heavily praises ancient Indian religions like Hinduism and Buddhism in their dealing with the existence. Yet he sees the 'deep-sleep' of union of the Atman (self) and Brahman (Universal Absolute) and Buddhism's Nirvana, as one and the same in that they transcend the suffering of reality in profound serenity by in essence being metaphorical 'deep sleeps' or cessation of existence.
Nietzsche praises Buddhism's ancient atheism which he remarks occurred, '500 years before the Christian calendar' and praises Buddhism's very potent anasthetic; some religions Nietzsche discusses to try and combat the seeming meaninglessness and absurdity of existence, did away with existence itself, they reduced reality itself to a mere illusion, as in the case of Buddhism.
Overall Nietzsche's work is profoundly beautifully written (as conveyed by the translation), it is an intensely provocative yet thought provoking piece of work, one that expounds Nietzsche's personal philosophical views on the nature of morality and especially in book 3 about the origins of religion and the role of the 'ascetic priest' in engineering religion as the supreme medication for the symptomatic pain of existence's meaninglessness. Nietzsche's work is essential for anyone interested in Existentialist philosophy, as well as the philosophy of the history of religion and morality. It is extremely controversial and especially provocative in the context of Nietzsche's dismantling of religion as a mere set of 'lies' told by charlatans, but beneath this seeming criticism is a profound melancholic sorrow at the death of religion in post-Enlightenment Europe's intellectual circles, which Nietzsche felt may propel society to a pessimistic nihilism.
Nietzche ultimately sees the 'ascetic priests' as almost necessary and religion and God, even if they are indeed stories as necessary to instigate a universal desire to live and a higher ideal for society to strive towards, as it creates a meaning out of what is in Nietzsche's view a world devoid of any inherent meaning or objective truth.
I strongly appreciate Nietzsche's work however and found it a moving read by an insightful philosopher, though I myself do not agree with his Atheism, I appreciate and understand his stance and philosophy behind it. I myself believe that there is a God, but regardless appreciated Nietzsche insights and perspectives into the essential origin of religion and morality. A must read, even if you are religious, give it a careful reflective reading there is much that is thought provoking, and almost poetically conveyed. You may not agree with everything he says, but you must concede he was a man of powerful words.
Reviewed in India on April 25, 2021