What do you think?
Rate this book
480 pages, Hardcover
First published February 23, 2015
..all major revolutions... involve intense convictions that the society must and can be changed, convictions that easily breed impatience and intolerance with opposition. All revolutions engender counterrevolutionary opposition among those whose interests and values are threatened. All revolutions, during the inevitable process of transition, tend to produce power vacuums and create situations in which every authority is put into question, in which- as Mirabeau expressed it -"all the old boundaries have been erased." All revolutions can be pushed in unanticipated directions by the influence of the popular masses. And it may well be that all major revolutions are beset by periods of conspiracy obsession, of intense suspicion and lack of trust, of agonizing uncertainty as to who are one's friends and who are one's enemies, who are the true revolutionaries and who are the wolves in sheep's clothing, hiding behind the mask of revolutionary commitment.
Loved the book-- LOVED it. A great performance. But at times, it did as if I were reading a description of our own time: "a Manichean language would increasingly be used by patriots to refer to rival factions of other Revolutionaries. Indeed, the inflationary hatred and verbal violence of the first years of the Revolution, born from a culture of fear, rumor [alternate facts?] and denunciation, as well as from a genuine menace of counterrevolution, would anticipate and help foster the psychology of the Terror." (141) Urgh!
I don't know the literature well enough to situate Tackett in the current debates surrounding the French Rev, but he is at pains to point out that "circumstances had a powerful impact on the coming of the Terror. Yet circumstances alone would have been insufficient without a prior transformation of the psychology and mentalite of the revolutionaries, a transformation with a tragic inner logic that was integral to the process of the French Rev" (348). Which is slightly different than, say, Georges Lefebvre's idea that class conflict was at such a pitch that all that followed was more or less inevitable.
Another aspect I appreciated very much was how the book was structured; in the first half Tackett outlines his 'theoretical' approach to the Terror and the causes that gave rise to it, while the second half is a straightforward narrative in which we see how these theoretical aspects of the issue come into play.