
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$12.99$12.99
FREE delivery: Wednesday, April 3 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $9.57
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $4.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition Paperback – May 31, 2011
Purchase options and add-ons
From its start, America has been awash in drink. The sailing vessel that brought John Winthrop to the shores of the New World in 1630 carried more beer than water. By the 1820s, liquor flowed so plentifully it was cheaper than tea. That Americans would ever agree to relinquish their booze was as improbable as it was astonishing.
Yet we did, and Last Call is Daniel Okrent’s dazzling explanation of why we did it, what life under Prohibition was like, and how such an unprecedented degree of government interference in the private lives of Americans changed the country forever.
Writing with both wit and historical acuity, Okrent reveals how Prohibition marked a confluence of diverse forces: the growing political power of the women’s suffrage movement, which allied itself with the antiliquor campaign; the fear of small-town, native-stock Protestants that they were losing control of their country to the immigrants of the large cities; the anti-German sentiment stoked by World War I; and a variety of other unlikely factors, ranging from the rise of the automobile to the advent of the income tax.
Through it all, Americans kept drinking, going to remarkably creative lengths to smuggle, sell, conceal, and convivially (and sometimes fatally) imbibe their favorite intoxicants. Last Call is peopled with vivid characters of an astonishing variety: Susan B. Anthony and Billy Sunday, William Jennings Bryan and bootlegger Sam Bronfman, Pierre S. du Pont and H. L. Mencken, Meyer Lansky and the incredible—if long-forgotten—federal official Mabel Walker Willebrandt, who throughout the twenties was the most powerful woman in the country. (Perhaps most surprising of all is Okrent’s account of Joseph P. Kennedy’s legendary, and long-misunderstood, role in the liquor business.)
It’s a book rich with stories from nearly all parts of the country. Okrent’s narrative runs through smoky Manhattan speakeasies, where relations between the sexes were changed forever; California vineyards busily producing “sacramental” wine; New England fishing communities that gave up fishing for the more lucrative rum-running business; and in Washington, the halls of Congress itself, where politicians who had voted for Prohibition drank openly and without apology.
Last Call is capacious, meticulous, and thrillingly told. It stands as the most complete history of Prohibition ever written and confirms Daniel Okrent’s rank as a major American writer.
- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 31, 2011
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.4 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-10074327704X
- ISBN-13978-0743277044
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Editorial Reviews
Review
--Taylor Branch
"Daniel Okrent's "Last Call" fills a gaping void in American popular history that has been waiting for years to be filled, by providing a clear, sweeping, detailed and immensely readable account of Prohibition. His book is full of lively stories, incredible characters and fascinating research. It is, at once, great fun to read and solid history, a rare combination." -[trimmed quote still needsapproval]
--Michael Korda, author of "Ulysses S. Grant, ""Ike", and "With Wings Like Eagles"
"Daniel Okrent's" Last Call" is filled with delightful details, colorful characters, and fascinating social insights. And what a great tale! Prohibition may not have been a lot of fun, but this book sure is."
--Walter Isaacson
"Last Call is--I can't help it--a high, an upper, a delicious cocktail of a book, served with a twist or two and plenty of punch."
--Evan Thomas, "Newsweek"
"This is a marvelous and lively social history, one that manages to be both scholarly and exciting. Okrent takes us through a period of American history unlike any other. Fair-minded, insightful, and amused, he has a command of the material that makes the journey rewarding at every sober step of the way. I loved this book."
--Lawrence Wright, author, "The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11"
“A triumph. Okrent brilliantly captures the one glaring 'whoops!' in our Constitutional history. This entertaining portrait should stimulate fresh thought on the capacity and purpose of free government.”
--Taylor Branch
“Daniel Okrent's "Last Call" fills a gaping void in American popular history that has been waiting for years to be filled, by providing a clear, sweeping, detailed and immensely readable account of Prohibition. His book is full of lively stories, incredible characters and fascinating research. It is, at once, great fun to read and solid history, a rare combination." –[trimmed quote still needsapproval]
—Michael Korda, author of "Ulysses S. Grant, " "Ike", and "With Wings Like Eagles"
“Daniel Okrent's" Last Call" is filled with delightful details, colorful characters, and fascinating social insights. And what a great tale! Prohibition may not have been a lot of fun, but this book sure is.”
—Walter Isaacson
“Last Call is--I can't help it--a high, an upper, a delicious cocktail of a book, served with a twist or two and plenty of punch.”
—Evan Thomas, "Newsweek"
“This is a marvelous and lively social history, one that manages to be both scholarly and exciting. Okrent takes us through a period of American history unlike any other. Fair-minded, insightful, and amused, he has a command of the material that makes the journey rewarding at every sober step of the way. I loved this book.”
--Lawrence Wright, author, "The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11"
"This is history served the way one likes it, with scholarly authority and literary grace. "Last Call" is a fascinating portrait of an era and a very entertaining tale."
--Tracy Kidder
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Product details
- Publisher : Scribner; 1st edition (May 31, 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 074327704X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743277044
- Item Weight : 15.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1.4 x 8.44 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #54,893 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #9 in U.S.Congresses, Senates & Legislative
- #127 in Women in History
- #985 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Daniel Okrent was the first public editor of The New York Times, editor-at-large of Time, Inc., and managing editor of Life magazine. Among his books, "Great Fortune: The Epic of Rockefeller Center" was a finalist for the 2004 Pulitzer Prize in history, and "Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition" was honored by the American Historical Association as 2011's best book of American history. Okrent lives in Manhattan and on Cape Cod with his wife, poet Rebecca Okrent.
Learn more at danielokrent.com.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It is now nearly universally concluded that the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was one of the worst fiascos ever foisted upon our country; moreover, that it was brought about solely by fundamentalist Christians.
The last part is a myth (and to be fair, heavy drinking was a problem in the late 19th-early 20th century). If not, then why would the above groups, who differed on so many other issues and in other respects would find each other repugnant, favor the policy of prohibition? And then, just 15 years later, how did the 18th Amendment become the only one in our nation's history to be repealed? Attached to that, why did the American populace so heavily reverse itself on this issue?
All of these questions demonstrate what a fascinating piece of history prohibition was. And author Daniel Okrent provides the answers in his wonderful book, "Last Call."
Okrent begins by telling the story of how prohibition got started: beginning in the mid-19th century, various church movements and organizations began to lobby for it, albeit with little success.
It wasn't until the turn of the century that the movement really began to pick up steam. This was largely due to the fact that those who favored temperance got organized. Supporters also latched onto an anti-immigrant backlash: most turn-of-the-century immigrants were Irish and German, and were heavy beer drinkers. Additionally, there were brazen appeals to racism.
Once it became law, however, Okrent notes that enforcement was much easier said than done, for a number of reasons:
First, two of the presidents who were in office during this era (Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge) were ambivalent at best about enforcing it. As for Warren Harding, who died in office in 1923, some in his cabinet members were involved in bootlegging. So were many other politicians at this time.
Second, there were loopholes in the law. For instance, there was a religious exemption for Orthodox Jews; coincidentally, this era saw a large conversion rate to that religion.
Third, just as many opponents of prohibition (most notably former president William H. Taft and essayist H.L. Mencken) rightly predicted, criminal elements would prosper because of it. Okrent records that immediately before the 18th Amendment took effect, Mencken sold his car and used the proceeds to purchase massive amounts of adult beverages.
Fourth, many Canadians started wineries and breweries, smuggled their goods over the borders, and made large fortunes.
Fifth, all of this led to greater corruption in politics. This could be subtle, as when police stationed at the docks would fine bootleggers, who merely counted those fines as part of their production costs. But the corruption could also be overt, as when gangsters such as Al Capone and Meyer Lansky virtually controlled local law enforcement.
So then, what killed prohibition? Okrent gives a number of factors:
First, the aforementioned mob bosses were rightly seen as the direct result of the 18th Amendment. There is little chance that such flamboyant criminals (especially Capone) would have been nearly so successful (and brazenly so) without a nationwide anti-alcohol policy. As this era wore on, more and more people came to that conclusion.
Second, activists like Pauline Sabin began to see the deleterious effects of prohibition. Once a supporter of the 18th Amendment, Sabin especially made it fashionable for women to be politically active in this cause.
Third, publishing magnate William Randolph Hearst tired of prohibition. In the late 1920s, he instructed his newspaper editors to flout the hypocrisy of dry politicians when they were caught with alcohol. This was done to marvelous affect, and helped to reverse public opinion on this policy.
Fourth, when Herbert Hoover was elected president in 1928, he badly misread his mandate: instead of focusing solely on the fact that he was elected to continue the economic policies of his predecessors, he thought it was because prohibition was more popular than it actually was. In his inaugural address, he devoted much heated rhetoric on why anti-liquor laws needed to be tougher, when in fact Americans were tiring of it.
All of that to say, when the stock market crashed in October 1929, the perception that Hoover was out of touch with the nation was magnified even more. So when 1932 rolled around with no end in sight to the Great Depression, Franklin D. Roosevelt acutely read the public mood, and ran on a platform of repeal (though he had a history of waffling on this issue).
"Last Call" captures each of these episodes well, which makes it such a compelling read.
Additionally, there are some interesting anecdotes; for instance, Okrent also makes a compelling case that contrary to popular myth, Joseph Kennedy was not involved in bootlegging at all; that such claims only came about in 1960 when his son ran for president.
All told, "Last Call" should go down as one of the best volumes written on this subject. If I do have one criticism, it is this: there is a very heavy reliance upon quotations from that era. While this is helpful in some respects, it makes Okrent's prose a little too choppy.
That once criticism aside, however, I highly recommend "Last Call."
Mr. Okrent's tale of how Prohibition and its repeal were intertwined with tax policy is fascinating and will be unfamiliar even to many of those who think they know a lot about taxes already.
"By 1910 the federal government was drawing more than $200 million a year from the bottle and the keg - 71 percent of all internal revenue, and more than 30 percent of federal revenue overall," he writes. "Given that you couldn't collect much revenue from a liquor tax in a nation where there was no liquor, this might have seemed an insurmountable problem for the Prohibition movement. Unless, that is, you could weld the drive for Prohibition to the campaign for another reform, the creation of a tax on incomes."
"When the income tax was finally legalized, it was the industrialized East that yielded before it: 44 percent of the revenue collected came from New York State alone. It was not a coincidence that eight of the first nine legislatures to have ratified the amendment (starting with Alabama, where the vote was unanimous in both houses) were in southern or border states," he writes, calling the constitutional amendment creating the income tax a way for "many of the racially motivated prohibitionists of the South" to "avenge Reconstruction by striking back at the economic and political imperialists of the North."
If the imposition of the income tax went hand in hand with Prohibition, so the effort to repeal Prohibition went along with opposition to the income tax. Mr. Okrent writes that the Association Against the Prohibition Amendment included some of the richest men in the country. In 1926 it won the attention of Pierre S. du Pont.
The Revenue Act of 1916, Mr. Okrent writes, had taken "three swings at the du Pont family's wealth: doubling the income tax rates on those in the highest brackets, creating the nation's first peacetime inheritance tax, and assessing a 12.5 percent levy on the profits of munitions manufacturers."
Du Pont wrote a friend that with repeal of Prohibition, "the revenue of the government would be increased sufficiently to warrant the abolition of the income tax and corporation tax."
The Great Depression reduced federal revenue from the income and capital gains taxes to the point where alcohol tax revenue was again desired. But it turned out to be in addition to the other taxes, rather than instead of it. Du Pont, in victory, realized his error. The Prohibition repeal effort he had been so involved with, he said, should have been directed instead at the 16th Amendment, the one establishing the income tax, which "could have been repealed with the expenditure of less time and trouble than was required for the abolition of its little brother."
Another area in which Mr. Okrent's book is strong is religion - particularly, the Jewish involvement in illegal liquor distribution and sales. His focus is the Bronfman family of Canada, where liquor was legal. He says that part of the explanation for the prevalence of Jews in the alcoholic beverage business is that other fields were closed to them.
One of the rum-running ships that plied the waters off Canada was named the Mazel Tov. Another set of smuggling boats, on the Detroit River, was known as "the Little Jewish Navy."
There are other aspects of Mr. Okrent's tale that will be relevant to today's readers.
Think there's a revolving door now between Congress and the corporate lobbyists' headquarters on K Street? Mr. Okrent reports that the assistant attorney general in charge of Prohibition enforcement left and became a paid lawyer-lobbyist for Fruit Industries, which, with her help, received a $20 million loan from the Federal Farm Board to help launch its home winemaking business. A former director of the Prohibition Bureau became the head of the liquor manufacturer's trade association, Mr. Okrent says.
And readers who want to "repeal" ObamaCare may be heartened by Mr. Okrent's account of the repeal of Prohibition. When the Senate voted in February 1933 to repeal Prohibition, "of the twenty-two members who had voted for the Eighteenth Amendment sixteen years earlier and were still senators, seventeen voted to undo their earlier work."
There are a lot of different characters to keep track of in this somewhat sprawling account, many of them obscure to today's readers. But I found it worth it to gain the understanding of this episode, which still shapes the tax bills of Americans, if not their drinking habits.
Top reviews from other countries




