Recent activities for August 2025

My Global Scholars newsletter for August is now posted. Included are two reviews of my latest book, an interview with a Canadian Tory, a modal analysis of two metrical psalters, an online conversation with a group of young people, and a tribute to a recently departed teacher and scholar.

Cardus NextGen event

Last evening, at the invitation of Stephen Lazarus, I spoke with this year's Cardus NextGen cohort of young people who are being mentored towards service in public life. I have done this annually for a few years now. Those in the programme read selections from two of my books, Political Visions and Illusions and Citizenship Without Illusions, both published by IVP Academic. This is the first group to have read both of these books, given that the latter came out less than a year ago. As before, I enjoyed my conversation with these young people and wish them God's blessings as they seek his will for their lives and work in his kingdom.

The last Koyzis

I've not spent a lot of effort exploring the origins of my exceedingly rare surname, but this is the best I can do: The last Koyzis. An excerpt:

My Dutch Canadian friends and acquaintances tell stories of how, in 1811, Napoleon compelled residents of the Netherlands to adopt surnames. Prior to that year, many people in the Low Countries had gone by patronymics based on their respective fathers’ first names. Assuming that surnames were a passing fashion, many Netherlanders adopted humorous names, with which, two centuries later, their descendants are still stuck.

In my father’s native island of Cyprus, fixed surnames weren’t adopted until the island’s independence in 1960. Thus my father was born with only a first name and a patronymic: Theodoros Antoniou – Theodore son of Anthony.

 Read the rest of the article here.

Calvin Seerveld (1930-2025)

Calvin Seerveld was the longtime senior member in aesthetic philosophy at the Institute for Christian Studies in Toronto. I myself was a junior member (student) there in the late 1970s and had the privilege of sitting in one of his seminar courses. Although he was not my principal mentor, I recall his inimitable teaching style and the enthusiasm he brought to the subject matter.

As I write, I am looking at my notes from one of Seerveld's lectures from 20 September 1978. In my youthful handwriting, I quoted him: "The world is a created theatre of God," and "One finds meaning in Jesus Christ." Seerveld was above all a faithful servant of Christ and a memorable teacher.

Should churches endorse political candidates?

Bruce Barron, of Bruce's gently provocative thoughts, has published a lengthy review of Citizenship Without Illusions, under this title: Should churches endorse political candidates? An excerpt:

Koyzis lays the groundwork for a deeper understanding of Christian citizenship by discussing what he calls “pluriformity”—the fact that societies are composed of “a multiplicity of social formations, each of which has its proper place and normative task in God’s world.” We have allegiances to family, church, neighborhood, schools, workplace, social clubs, multiple levels of government, and more. We engage in many spheres of life, such as education, healthcare, and culture. And as Christians, we must balance our responsibilities to our country, to all humanity, and to the kingdom of God.

In this context, politics is one important venue, but not the only one.

Do read the rest of the review here.

The rule of law versus overriding goals

In our era of social media, reasoned dialogue does not fare especially well. Too many of us are tempted to post short pithy memes containing half truths at best, all in an effort to score points against opponents whom we will almost certainly fail to persuade. 

In more than one place I have seen one such meme directed against those who may harbour doubts about the legality of current deportation policies in the United States. It runs as follows: if immigrants failed to respect due process in entering the country illegally, why should they themselves expect to be treated in accordance with due process? On the surface this may sound right to some.  But there is an obvious flaw in this reasoning: what if we were to apply it to ordinary criminals, for example, those who commit theft or murder? It would upend the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial for those alleged to have committed such crimes.

Ron Dart and the High Tory tradition

Not long ago I interviewed Ron Dart, a retired academic at the University of the Fraser Valley on a subject about which he has written extensively: Ron Dart and the High Tory tradition. An excerpt:

What is a Tory? Here in Canada, members and supporters of our federal and provincial Conservative Parties are known as Tories. But what does this mean? Is it similar to the Republican Party to our south? Or is there something distinctive about our Canadian conservative tradition that gives the Tory label a different connotation? Many of our fellow citizens would be at a loss to answer these questions.

But not Ron Dart, with whom I was privileged to talk some weeks ago.

Dart is Canada's resident expert on this country's Tory tradition and an admirer of George Parkin Grant, whom I was privileged to hear on two occasions, and Stephen Leacock, both of whom exemplify the Tory tradition.

Free Library review

One more review of Citizenship Without Illusions has appeared at The Free Library website. It's a very brief review written by Alexander Pyles. An excerpt:

Ending on a note that one can see coming, Koyzis affirms that Christians are God's children first, despite any allegiance or feeling of loyalty to a nation. Such feelings come second to our identity in Christ. At a time of rising Christian nationalism and even Christofascism, this is a reminder that Christians must do better for our neighbors, both local and global. 

I am, of course, grateful for another positive review of my book. 

Recent activities for July 2025

I have now posted my Global Scholars newsletter for July 2025. Included is an interview on the subject of my second book, two brief articles on scandal and marriage (separate topics!), and one more review of my third book, Citizenship Without Illusions. Thank you so much for your continued financial and prayer support for my work! I deeply appreciate it.

The good of marriage

The recent wedding of our daughter and son-in-law prompted this reflection on a basic social institution: The good of marriage. An excerpt:

As I am only two generations removed from arranged marriage, I am well aware that past communities were unwilling to leave so important an institution solely in the hands of the prospective partners. If, as the old saying goes, it takes a village to raise a child, it also takes a supportive community to make a successful marriage.

Read the entire article here.

Peter Bell interview: America and Power

Some weeks ago, Peter Bell interviewed me for a second time, primarily on the subject of my second book, We Answer to Another: Authority, Office, and the Image of God, along with several related phenomena, including Catholic and Reformed Christian social teachings, Christian nationalism, and the perennial temptation to use unjust means for desired ends. You can see the entire interview below. This is part of the second season of Bell's series, Sons of Patriarchy.

Zekveld review of Citizenship

Another review of my Citizenship Without Illusions has appeared, although I'm a little late in posting about it here, as it was published on 15 March 2025 in the periodical, Christian Renewal, which appears not to publish its articles online. However, the review was posted at ARPA's Facebook page and can be found there if you can read the small print. The reviewer is Daniel Zekveld, a policy analyst with ARPA Canada. I should perhaps indicate that I taught Zekveld in one of my introductory-level courses in political science nearly a decade ago. I am grateful for yet another positive review of my book.

Scandal revisited

Christian Courier has published my recent article, Scandal revisited. An excerpt:

In my youth I cut my political teeth on the Watergate scandal, which nearly paralyzed the country of my birth for the two years between 1972 and 74. Although my family generally voted Republican when I was growing up, I began to have doubts about Richard Nixon’s presidency after the break-in at the Democratic Party headquarters. As Nixon was implicated in the cover-up, many Americans were increasingly persuaded that he had abused his office, putting his own political fortunes ahead of the Constitution. Three years after his resignation, Nixon admitted in an interview with David Frost that “when the president does [something], that means that it is not illegal.”

Read the entire article here. 

Recent activities for June 2025

My Global Scholars newsletter for June 2025 is now posted. Included are another review of Citizenship Without Illusions, a reflection on George Grant's Lament for a Nation 60 years later, the King's Speech, and the perils of democratism.

When democracy threatens politics

Might democracy threaten ordinary politics? The American founders were not democrats in the contemporary sense of that term but were building a republican constitution with limited democratic elements, embodied especially in Congress’ lower chamber, the House of Representatives. Nearly a century later, Canada’s Fathers of Confederation established a constitution “similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom” (Constitution Act, 1867). Here too the new dominion was to be a careful balance of monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic elements, although the term republic was not used for obvious reasons.

Beginning in the 20^th century, however, both systems came to be described as democracies without qualification. In Canada, the powers of the nondemocratic institutions, especially the governor general (representing the monarch) and the Senate (appointed by the governor general on the prime minister’s advice), effectively atrophied, with the prime minister gaining more power—all in the name of democracy.

Evangelical population growth in Brazil

The seventh largest country in the world by population, Brazil is also the largest Catholic country in the world, but that status is changing quickly, according to this article in The Guardian: Catholics now make up little more than half Brazil’s population, by Tiago Rogero. An excerpt:

Thirty years ago, Catholics made up 82.9% of Brazil’s population but now account for just over half, 56.7%, according to the 2022 census – whose results on religion were only released on Friday.

Meanwhile, the number of evangelicals has continued to grow, rising from 9% of the population to 26.9% over the past three decades.

Although the growth rate has slowed slightly – rising by 6.5 percentage points between 2000 and 2010, and 5.3 since – the new data shows that, for the first time, at least one in four Brazilians identifies as evangelical . . . .

Beyond Lament: George Grant and Canada's distinctiveness

Christian Courier has just posted my monthly column, titled, Beyond Lament. An excerpt:

After John Diefenbaker’s Conservative government was defeated by Lester Pearson’s Liberals in 1963, [George Parkin] Grant was convinced that Canada’s days as a distinct nation were numbered. Diefenbaker’s reluctance to accept American nuclear weapons on Canadian soil had irked the “ruling class,” whose members determined that he had to go. But Grant believed that Diefenbaker’s only offence was his conviction that Canadian defence policies should be made in Ottawa and not Washington.

I couldn’t help recalling Grant’s Lament as we have been subjected to Donald Trump’s repeated trolling comments about Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States. Grant would express anger at this, of course, but it’s far from clear that he would have rallied the (literal and metaphorical) troops in opposition. His professed purpose in his book was not to make “practical proposals for our survival as a nation,” but simply to lament – to grieve the loss of those traditions that had once made Canada distinctive.

For more than two decades I had my students reading Grant's Lament and writing a paper on it. But at some point I put it aside because of the author's tendency to underestimate the importance of political factors in human motivations. I explain this more fully in something I wrote for Comment just over two decades ago: George Grant and the Primacy of Economics.

U.S. Catholic review

My new book has been briefly reviewed by Alexander Pyles in U.S. Catholic: What we’re reading this month: May 2025. An excerpt:

Citizenship is not at odds with being a Christian. For Koyzis, the reverse is the case: To be a good Christian, one must also be a good citizen. He references the parable of the Good Samaritan and other examples from scripture on taking care of your neighbor and, by extension, your community. This message is important and bears repeating in the months to come, so Koyzis’ encouragement is welcome.

While the book thoroughly covers the idea and issues of citizenship, it is not exhaustive. Koyzis stops short of going into the weeds of political culture and the nation-state superstructure. He focuses on defining conservative and progressive movements, not just in the United States but in Canadian politics as well.

U.S. Catholic is a publication of the Claretian Missionaries USA-Canada Province, "a global Roman Catholic congregation of priests and brothers who tend to the religious and pastoral needs of vulnerable communities."

The King's Throne Speech

In my personal library I have a copy of the June 1959 issue of The National Geographic Magazine which my parents received when I was a small child. In that issue is a colourful article, titled "Queen of Canada," written by journalist Phyllis Wilson with photographs by Kathleen Revis. It recounts the visit of her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II to Ottawa in 1957. The final photograph in this article is of the Queen and her consort Prince Philip seated on their red thrones in the Senate chamber as she reads the Speech from the Throne. Seated to her right is Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, who had only recently been elected as head of a minority Conservative government. The Queen would repeat this event in 1977 on the occasion of her silver jubilee.

This week her son King Charles III was in Ottawa to read the Throne Speech opening the 45th Parliament in the Senate's temporary facilities in the Senate of Canada Building at 2 Rideau Street. Suffice it to say that, although the monarch is entitled to read the Throne Speech and perform any number of monarchical duties relevant to Canada, most of these functions are handled by his Governor General, currently Her Excellency Mary Simon.

Recent activities for May 2025

I have now posted my Global Scholars Canada newsletter for May 2025. Included are two podcast interviews, a Canadian election postmortem, my initial thoughts on the new pope, and a board meeting in suburban Washington, DC. Thank you for your support for my work!

Canada votes 2025

Canadians went to the polls on monday, 28 April in the 45th federal election since Confederation in 1867. The final results were not unexpected, but they nevertheless represented a stunning turnaround from where we thought a few months ago we would be today. Under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party had become hugely unpopular, with pundits predicting an easy victory by Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives in the election expected sometime this year. Throughout most of the life of the 44th Parliament, the Liberals ruled as a minority government, a supply and confidence agreement with Jagmeet Singh's New Democrats keeping them in power.

Late last year, it became clear that the New Democrats had wearied of this arrangement and threatened to pull the plug on the government. For readers unfamiliar with Canadian politics, parties with only a plurality of the seats in the House of Commons rarely form coalition governments with other parties. The closest we have come to this at the federal level was the Union Government of Sir Robert Borden formed during the Great War between the ruling Conservatives and dissident Liberals outside Québec. It is exceedingly rare for a party to receive a majority of votes cast, and in recent years it has become difficult for a single party to obtain a majority of Commons seats as well. In many other democracies, a party lacking majority support would negotiate with other parties to form a multiparty coalition government. But not in Canada.

Pope Leo XIV

Now that our daughter is married as of last saturday, I will be gradually getting through a backlog of items that have accumulated during the period of preparation for this event. These include the recent Canadian election, on which I will shortly publish my thoughts; the political chaos south of the border; and the new pope. In many ways, the third item is more readily addressed than the first two, so I begin with that.

I have now lived through eight papacies. Given that successive conclaves of cardinals generally choose older men to fill the office, the length of a particular papacy is typically fairly short. Pope John XXIII reigned for only five years, yet his legacy has endured in the form of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). The recently departed Pope Francis was on the papal throne for a dozen years. John Paul II reigned for an unusually long 27 years, during which he managed to contribute to the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and its bloc of client states, including his native Poland. In the 19th century, Pius IX broke the record for length of tenure, reigning for 31 years, during which he convened the First Vatican Council (1869-1870), setting the agenda for the Roman Catholic Church into the mid 20th century.

God's Story Podcast interview 2

Earlier this year I was privileged to talk for a second time with Brent Siddall on his God's Story Podcast. Here is the new interview, which is now posted: David Koyzis — Political Visions and Illusions. I would love one day to travel to Brent's native New Zealand (Aotearoa) and spend some time taking in the spectacular scenery of this stunning if remote Commonwealth realm.

Carmen LaBerge interview: church splits

My recent conversation with Carmen LaBerge aired today, on Maundy Thursday. The subject is my recent Cateclesia essay, By Schisms Rent Asunder: The Four Seasons of Church Splits. My previous interview with her can be found here. The programme is called The Reconnect on Faith Radio. I've set the video to begin at approximately ten minutes into the broadcast when our conversation begins.

Recent activities for April 2025

My Global Scholars newsletter for April is now posted. Included are a guitar performance of a beloved Holy Week hymn, another review of my Citizenship Without Illusions, speaking at a local church function, and posts on the Bible and eschatology.

Holy Week: O Sacred Head, Now Wounded

'Bob on Books' review: Citizenship Without Illusions

Bob Trube reviews my new book on his Bob on Books blog: Review: Citizenship Without Illusions. An excerpt:

For years I’ve found myself in this place. I recognize that we need good governance from the officials we elect. But I cannot fully endorse what either of our parties propound nor give unquestioning allegiance to person or party. What is difficult is that I have friends on both sides of the partisan divide who seem to give unflinching allegiance to their party and the people they have elected or want to elect. Often, I find conversations with such individuals futile. There is no questioning allowed and only one side is right on everything. It is particularly disconcerting when my friends resort to lies and character assassination to buttress their political allegiance. I grope for a different kind of political engagement or want to just withdraw.

Citizenship Without Illusions is written for people like me.

Why I'm Not a Postmillennial

Although I'm tempted to make a punny reference to the generation born in the 1980s and 90s, my recent Christian Courier column actually has to do with the finer points of Christian eschatology: Why I'm Not Postmillennial. An excerpt:

Only in recent years have I made the acquaintance of postmillennialists, who expect a gradual advance of the kingdom of God in the present age to be followed by a long period of widespread obedience to his will before Christ returns. As attractive as this prospect appears, I do not find the position persuasive.

Find out why.

Incidentally, I have also written on the topic here—more than can be fitted easily into a 500-word column: Revelation 20 and the thousand years. As for one of the best books on biblical eschatology, you would do very well indeed to read James Skillen, God's Sabbath with Creation, which I reviewed here.

Bible versions

My latest column has been posted at Christian Courier: Bible versions. Here is an excerpt:

Having grown up with the King James Bible, I was briefly enamoured of the paraphrases of the Bible, including J. B. Phillips’ New Testament in Modern English, from which my mother read to us. Ken Taylor’s complete Living Bible was published when I was 15. (My parents knew him slightly, as we lived in the same town.) I received a copy for Christmas. Over the next months I eagerly devoured it from cover to cover. As easy as it was to read, I was put off to read that “your words are a flashlight to light the path ahead of me” (Psalm 119:105) and repeated references to Asia Minor as “Turkey.” Such obvious anachronisms ruined the paraphrases for me. 

Read the entire article here.

Recent activities for March 2025

My Global Scholars Canada newsletter for March 2025 is now posted. Included is a 30th anniversary celebration of the organization I serve, podcast and radio interviews, and an essay to mark the 1,700 anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea.

The Idolatry of Politics

Last summer Peter Bell interviewed me on the subject of my two best-known books, Political Visions and Illusions and Citizenship Without Illusions. In this conversation I discuss two events in my youth that pushed me to the study of politics and, much later, how I came to write my books. The length is just under 50 minutes.