What do you think?
Rate this book
395 pages, Hardcover
First published December 1, 2015
We know precious little about the Slavs who settled Ukrainian territory prior to the tenth and eleventh centuries. … The Slavs were agriculturalists who followed in the wake of nomad invasions, as the nomads who “made history” usually did not know what to do with land that was not steppe in which their animals could graze. The waves of Slavic colonization were slow and mostly peaceful, and the results were to prove long-lasting.The name Ukraine means “frontier” or “borderland”, and it follows that their long history is filled with instances of multiple crossings of its border by traders, missionaries, nomadic horsemen, and organized armies from multiple directions. In the ninth and tenth centuries the Vikings passed through from the north seeking trade with the Byzantine empire. They brought the term “Rus’” which was later applied to the name for the polity that developed from the tenth to the mid-thirteenth centuries with its center at Kyiv. Scholars today refer to that polity as Kyivan Rus'. The Cathedral of St. Sophia was constructed in Kyiv during this era (11th century).
Kyivan Rus', a polity with no generally recognized date of birth, has a definite date of death. It occurred on December 7, 1240, when yet another wave of invaders from the Eurasian steppes, the Mongols, conquered the city of Kyiv.The city of Kyiv diminished in importance under Mongol rule (also known as the Golden Horde). In a decisive battle in 1362, Lithuanian and Rus’ forces defeated the a leading tribe of the Golden Horde. The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth subsequently controlled the Ukrainian region for many years.
The Cossacks had come a long way—from small bands of fishermen and trappers foraging in the steppes south of Kyiv to settlers of new lands along the steppe frontier; from private militiamen in the employ of princes to fighters in an independent force that foreigners treated with respect; and, finally, from refugees and adventurers to members of a cohesive military brotherhood that regarded itself as a distinct social order and demanded from the government not only money but also recognition of its warrior status. The Polish state could benefit from the military might and economic potential of the Cossacks only if it managed to accommodate their social demands. As subsequent developments would show repeatedly, that was no easy task.In 1476 the first tsar and Muscovite ruler, Grand Prince Ivan III, manage to free his country to the north from the Mongols, and his kingdom would later grow to become a regional power. In an effort to free Ukraine from the Poles, the Cossacks made an agreement with Muscovy in return for their protection. Russia’s claims to Ukrainian territory date to this event.
The Turning Point in the internationalization of the Khmelnytsky Revolt took place on January 8, 1654, in the town of Pereiaslav. On that day, Bohdan Khmelnytsky and a hastily gathered group of Cossack officers swore allegiance to the new sovereign of Ukraine, Tsar Aleksei Romanov of Muscovy. The long and complex history of Russo-Ukrainian relations had begun.Unfortunately the promised protection to be provided by Muscovy didn't materialize. The Khmelnytsky uprising unleashed a long period of wars that many historians refer to as the Ruin. Eventually the Ukraine region was divided between the Ottoman Empire, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, and Muscovy-Russia. Subsequently, the competing empires of Prussia, Austria, and Russia divided up the region. This time period is filled with so many shifts in boundaries that I'll not try to offer a summary in this review.
The eighteenth century was not only an age of enlightenment and reason. More than anything else, it was an age of empire.This book contains several chapters on Ukrainian cultural, literary, and religious history. After the the Crimean War considerable industrialization occurred in southeastern Ukraine due to the presence of coal and iron ore. Consequently there was labor unrest, and it was this discontent of the impoverished workers that eventually led to the 1917 revolution that deposed the Czar.
Altogether, close to 4 million people perished in Ukraine as a result of the famine, more than decimating the country—every eighth person succumbed to hunger between 1932 and 1934.Ukraine emerged from World War II as one of the Soviet Republics. It had gained territory with the boundaries we know today, but its people and economy were in a sorry state.
Although the map made it seem like one of the main beneficiaries of the war—Ukraine’s territory increased by more than 15 percent—the republic was in fact one of the war’s main victims. It lost up to 7 million of its citizens, who had constituted more than 15 percent of its population. Out of 36 million remaining Ukrainians, some 10 million didn’t have a roof over their heads, as approximately 700 cities and towns and 28,000 villages lay in ruins. Ukraine lost 40 percent of its wealth and more than 80 percent of its industrial and agricultural equipment. In 1945, the republic produced only one-quarter of its prewar output of industrial goods and 40 percent of its previous agricultural produce.The book provides an interesting accounting of post-war Soviet history including the death of Stalin, the era of Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the 2004 Orange Revolution, and the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Russian aggression sought to divide Ukrainians along linguistic, regional, and ethnic lines. While that tactic succeeded in some places, most of Ukrainian society united around the idea of a multilingual and multicultural nation joined in administrative and political terms. That idea, born of lessons drawn from Ukraine’s difficult and often tragic history of internal divisions, rests on a tradition of coexistence of different languages, cultures, and religions over the centuries. The Ukrainians managed to read their troubled history in a way that secured their future as a political nation.In the book's Epilog the following description of the Russian mindset describes the motivations for the partial invasion then, but I think also applies to the current war.
But Russian mercenaries and volunteers brought to the region an overarching idea of a different kind. Like the best known of the Russian commanders, Igor Girkin, they came to the Donbas to defend the values of the “Russian World” against the West. In that context, they saw Ukraine as a battleground between corrupt Western values, including democracy, individual freedoms, human rights, and, especially, the rights of sexual minorities on the one hand and traditional Russian values on the other. By that logic, Western propaganda had simply addled the Ukrainians’ minds. It was up to the Russians to show them the light.The book also contains numerous maps, a timeline of Ukrainian history, and a listing of "Who's Who in Ukrainian History."