Many of the reviews for Dragon Hunter make mention that instead of being a book about dinosaurs, it is instead a book about looking for dinosaurs. Right on and as it should be. Roy Chapman Andrews is a man who, in the scientific sphere, hardly requires an introduction. His Asiatic expeditions however have only been chronicled in a handful of texts; certainly, none of them intended for a general audience.
As a professional paleontologist, I was well aware of the outcomes of his expeditions and what the AMNH has to show for them. I am also aware of the popular stigma that whirls around Andrews and his expeditions. So, I'll start there and then move on. I am a big believer that you cannot separate the scientist from their time in history. Andrews, and the AMNH policies at the time, absolutely played into imperialist culture. They went places because they wanted to, they exploited finds because they could, and they held onto beliefs that today would be unconscionable. That being said, Andrews, while living up to this point in time, was not in the least the worst of the crowd. Many of his beliefs I will not defend today, but for an explorer of his time, he did provide the countries he exploited with far more specimens, casts, data, maps, and such than many others I can think of. If you want to rag on any of them, then read up on his mentor Ostrom and get back to me. That guy was a real piece of work of which many of his efforts are not defensible in any way.
The biggest issue in this book I found to be the reminders of how the lands Andrews & Co. were traveling through were "never explored" and uninhabitable. While true that these lands had not been formally mapped by that point, one can hardly call them uninhabitable. Lamas, nomads, Mongolians, and a many other people were living there, still are living there, and repeatedly assisted the expeditions the entire way. I appreciate that Gallenkamp is attempting to replicate the feeling of adventure, but this portion rings false the entire way through.
Now that that is out of the way, the book itself is very good at what it sets out to do; provide a week by week re-telling (more or less), for a popular audience, of the Asiatic expeditions and Andrews as a leader in both the field (literal) and the field (scientifically). I found the discussions of Andrew's early days studying whales very interesting as well as his limited tenure as acting director of the AMNH.
This book is well-written, interesting, and does what it sets out to do. For a book like this, I'm unsure if there is much more to be asked.
4/5: Loses a point for not properly addressing stigma now vs. today and having far too many names just listed that make up many portions of many paragraphs.