What do you think?
Rate this book
Once an Eagle
Once An Eagle is the story of one special man, a soldier named Sam Damon, and his adversary over a lifetime, fellow officer Courtney Massengale. Damon is a professional who puts duty, honor, and the men he commands above self interest. Massengale, however, brilliantly advances by making the right connections behind the lines and in Washington's corridors of power.
Beginning in the French countryside during the Great War, the conflict between these adversaries solidifies in the isolated garrison life marking peacetime, intensifies in the deadly Pacific jungles of World War II, and reaches its treacherous conclusion in the last major battleground of the Cold War -- Vietnam.
A study in character and values, courage, nobility, honesty, and selflessness, here is an unforgettable story about a man who embdies the best in our nation -- and in us all.
1312 pages, Paperback
First published June 1, 1968
About the author
Anton Myrer
36 books55 followersAnton Myrer, who died of leukemia in 1996, was a best-selling author whose themes were America's loss of innocence and the use and abuse of power. He is particularly remembered for The Last Convertible (1978), a summation of the American experience during and after World War II, and for Once an Eagle (1968), which traces the life of a regular Army officer and his family from before World War I to Vietnam. Orville Prescott, in The New York Times wrote of Once an Eagle: "Myrer is a superb story teller....who cares about the narrative and is a master." The Army War College Foundation, which is republishing the novel this year, describes it as "a perceptive study of the profession of arms an a chilling overview of armed conflict... Myrer forces us to smell and feel the battlefield as well as hear and see it."
Myrer also wrote Evil Under the Sun (1951); The Big War (1957), of which one critic wrote, "I doubt if it is possible to come much closer... to an American War and Peace"; The Violent Shore, (1962); The Intruder: A Novel of Boston (1965); The Tiger Waits (1973); and A Green Desire (1981). The Library has copies of all eight novels in much-read first editions and, in the case of six of the eight, in leather-bound volumes recently donated by Mrs. Myrer.
Born in Worchester, Massachusetts, Myrer grew up in the Berkshires, Cape Cod, and Beacon Hill -- all settings for his novels. A 1941 graduate of Boston Latin School, he interrupted his education at Harvard after Pearl Harbor to enlist in the Marine Corps and spent more than three years in the Pacific. He rose to the rank of corporal, took part in the invasion of Guam, and was wounded. He returned to graduate from Harvard magna cum laude and subsequently lived on the Cape, in Portugal, and at the time of his death, in upstate New York where he received books by mail from the Library
All who have read Myrer's novels know the strength and passion of his moral vision.
by Barbara H. Stanton
http://www.nysoclib.org/notes/notes4-...
Myrer also wrote Evil Under the Sun (1951); The Big War (1957), of which one critic wrote, "I doubt if it is possible to come much closer... to an American War and Peace"; The Violent Shore, (1962); The Intruder: A Novel of Boston (1965); The Tiger Waits (1973); and A Green Desire (1981). The Library has copies of all eight novels in much-read first editions and, in the case of six of the eight, in leather-bound volumes recently donated by Mrs. Myrer.
Born in Worchester, Massachusetts, Myrer grew up in the Berkshires, Cape Cod, and Beacon Hill -- all settings for his novels. A 1941 graduate of Boston Latin School, he interrupted his education at Harvard after Pearl Harbor to enlist in the Marine Corps and spent more than three years in the Pacific. He rose to the rank of corporal, took part in the invasion of Guam, and was wounded. He returned to graduate from Harvard magna cum laude and subsequently lived on the Cape, in Portugal, and at the time of his death, in upstate New York where he received books by mail from the Library
All who have read Myrer's novels know the strength and passion of his moral vision.
by Barbara H. Stanton
http://www.nysoclib.org/notes/notes4-...
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 528 reviews
April 27, 2016
This is a novel as big as a life.
Usually, when I go to airports, I am well prepared. I have my main book; my backup book; my backup to the backup; and my ultimate backup, if I meet with a series of delays or the other backups are terrible or I somehow find time to read all the others. On my way back from Florida, though, I suddenly found myself in Tampa's airport with nothing to read, so I purchased this 1,200 page doorstop with the knowledge that it'd last.
Once An Eagle traces the arc of a soldier's life: it follows Sad Sam Damon from his youth in a small Nebraska town (on the eve of America's entry into World War I) to his destiny in the steamy jungles of Southeast Asia decades later. It is a book that apparently is required reading at the Service Academies, and based on many of the reviews I've read, is highly thought-of in military circles. I don't have that kind of connection to the material; I can vouch, though, for its virtues. For one, it is an in-depth study of leadership. It also does a marvelous job capturing a snapshot of the early 20th century American Army, before it became the highly professional force that it is today.
The book starts slowly, which is never a good thing when you have more than 1,200 pages to get through. But when you're stuck on a plane, you have no choice but to keep reading. (Or make conversation with your seatmate, which is an option I shudder to comprehend). It begins with Sam talking to his girl Celia, about World War I, which is then raging in Europe:
Sam does get mixed up in it. (Thankfully, for the dialogue between Sam and Celia is so badly stilted it gives stilts a bad name). He has dreams of West Point, and even gets accepted, but if he wants to attend, he will have to wait a year. Impulsively, he enlists instead, intending to work his way up through the ranks. Slowly, inexorably, he does.(This authorial decision spares the reader what would've been several hundred pages devoted to a West Point education, so it's a good thing Sam enlists).
Sam goes to Europe after America enters World War I, and serves heroically in the French countryside. After an unrelentingly dreary interlude in a scaled-back, post-war, peacetime Army, World War II breaks out. This time, Sam fights in the Pacific. This is where the action of the book picks up, with scenes of combat that are gripping and desperate, especially in comparison with the somewhat mundane and flaccid World War I section (the book is divided into chapters based on a geographic feature of the location where the chapter is set). This is perhaps owing to the fact that author Anton Meyer served in the same theater:
After his time in the Pacific, Damon serves as an observer in China, and eventually finished his career on a fact-finding mission to Vietnam.
The reason this book is a hit with military-types is because Sam Damon is the soldier all soldiers aspire to be. He is a career man, a professional, a lifer. He is that rare sort who devotes himself fully, not to a job but a calling. In Meyer's telling, there is something sacred and profound in Damon's unbroken service. Damon is a model commander: having risen from the enlisted ranks, he is solicitious of the men in his command. He is upright, stolid, fiercely loyal, and maniacally brave. At times, the character edges close to an archetype: the kind of square-jawed, clear-eyed hero we want to believe in. General Patton's intensity crossed with General Eisenhower's demeanor mixed with the All-American looks of Duke from G.I. Joe.
Yet Meyer contrasts the perfect knight with the flawed human. Damon has his flaws, they just aren't martial. At one point, he has an affair, though it's fair to say that Damon isn't regarded as the wrongdoer in the situation. He is also constantly railing against the stultifying military hierarchy that is slow to promote young, bright innovators, and which treats its enlisted men like garbage. Damon is portrayed as a man with Lasik enhanced vision in a kindgom of the blind.
The best parts of the book don't take place on the battlefields. Instead, it's the portrait of the toll Army life takes on the American family. Even though conditions have certainly improved, these sections of the book are as relevant today as ever. You really see the isolation experienced by military families when dad (and now, sometimes, mom) is off in the field. Beyond the absences, there is the transient nature of life, in which you are constantly uprooted and forced to move to a new place. And once you get to that place, you have to exist in a strictly defined social sphere (think John Ford's Fort Apache) where every relationship you have is predicated on rank. Meyer is at his best in evoking the far flung garrisons to which Damon is assigned. These are mostly distant, rundown garrisons that began as 19th century outposts guarding the frontier from Indians.
I thought Once An Eagle had a number of shortcomings. Foremost among them was a lack of memorable characters. Damon is fine as a centerpiece. He isn't dynamic in a true sense, but you spend so much time with him that you are practically forced to like him. Other than Damon, though, most characters walk-on and walk-off. There are two exceptions. The first is Damon's friend, Colonel Ben "Wolverine" Krisler; the second is Damon's enemy, General Cortney Massengale, who represents everything that Damon rails against. These two men never come alive, and serve strict dramatic purposes: Krisler as a sidekick, and Massengale as an antagonist and foil. Since there is no true plot, this being something of a bilungsroman, there are many slow-moving parts, especially at the beginning, where you have to wade through some clunky expositional dialogue and hasty explanations before Damon enlists.
Still, the overall effect of this book, perhaps due to its heroic length, is quite powerful. It gives you the full sweep of a life of service, with its many sacrifices and few tangible rewards.
By the end, when General Damon goes to Vietnam as an observer, you have seen the American Army as it should be (dedicated officers like Damon, who shares the danger and cares for his men) positioned athwart the American Army as it soon will be (filled with angry draftees who will be thinking about fragging their officers).
It's hard to tell if Meyer is making a plea, or marking the passing of an era.
Usually, when I go to airports, I am well prepared. I have my main book; my backup book; my backup to the backup; and my ultimate backup, if I meet with a series of delays or the other backups are terrible or I somehow find time to read all the others. On my way back from Florida, though, I suddenly found myself in Tampa's airport with nothing to read, so I purchased this 1,200 page doorstop with the knowledge that it'd last.
Once An Eagle traces the arc of a soldier's life: it follows Sad Sam Damon from his youth in a small Nebraska town (on the eve of America's entry into World War I) to his destiny in the steamy jungles of Southeast Asia decades later. It is a book that apparently is required reading at the Service Academies, and based on many of the reviews I've read, is highly thought-of in military circles. I don't have that kind of connection to the material; I can vouch, though, for its virtues. For one, it is an in-depth study of leadership. It also does a marvelous job capturing a snapshot of the early 20th century American Army, before it became the highly professional force that it is today.
The book starts slowly, which is never a good thing when you have more than 1,200 pages to get through. But when you're stuck on a plane, you have no choice but to keep reading. (Or make conversation with your seatmate, which is an option I shudder to comprehend). It begins with Sam talking to his girl Celia, about World War I, which is then raging in Europe:
'It all seems so far away,' Celia Harrodsen said. 'Paris and Berlin. And poor little Belgium. Sam, do you honestly thing we'll get mixed up in it?'
Sam does get mixed up in it. (Thankfully, for the dialogue between Sam and Celia is so badly stilted it gives stilts a bad name). He has dreams of West Point, and even gets accepted, but if he wants to attend, he will have to wait a year. Impulsively, he enlists instead, intending to work his way up through the ranks. Slowly, inexorably, he does.(This authorial decision spares the reader what would've been several hundred pages devoted to a West Point education, so it's a good thing Sam enlists).
Sam goes to Europe after America enters World War I, and serves heroically in the French countryside. After an unrelentingly dreary interlude in a scaled-back, post-war, peacetime Army, World War II breaks out. This time, Sam fights in the Pacific. This is where the action of the book picks up, with scenes of combat that are gripping and desperate, especially in comparison with the somewhat mundane and flaccid World War I section (the book is divided into chapters based on a geographic feature of the location where the chapter is set). This is perhaps owing to the fact that author Anton Meyer served in the same theater:
He was swept by so many perils he felt nothing: he had moved beyond them, out of their orbit. Nothing could touch him, crouched here, snatching up cartridges, snapping the breech open smartly, lifting his hand away from the recoil. He was nothing, he was beyond everything: the gun was animate, he was the oiled and glistening machine, the servant serving. What the hell, he thought; go out this way as any other. But the thought did not penetrate beyond a certain point; it lay outside his rage, the desperate, sweating ritual he was performing.
After his time in the Pacific, Damon serves as an observer in China, and eventually finished his career on a fact-finding mission to Vietnam.
The reason this book is a hit with military-types is because Sam Damon is the soldier all soldiers aspire to be. He is a career man, a professional, a lifer. He is that rare sort who devotes himself fully, not to a job but a calling. In Meyer's telling, there is something sacred and profound in Damon's unbroken service. Damon is a model commander: having risen from the enlisted ranks, he is solicitious of the men in his command. He is upright, stolid, fiercely loyal, and maniacally brave. At times, the character edges close to an archetype: the kind of square-jawed, clear-eyed hero we want to believe in. General Patton's intensity crossed with General Eisenhower's demeanor mixed with the All-American looks of Duke from G.I. Joe.
Yet Meyer contrasts the perfect knight with the flawed human. Damon has his flaws, they just aren't martial. At one point, he has an affair, though it's fair to say that Damon isn't regarded as the wrongdoer in the situation. He is also constantly railing against the stultifying military hierarchy that is slow to promote young, bright innovators, and which treats its enlisted men like garbage. Damon is portrayed as a man with Lasik enhanced vision in a kindgom of the blind.
The best parts of the book don't take place on the battlefields. Instead, it's the portrait of the toll Army life takes on the American family. Even though conditions have certainly improved, these sections of the book are as relevant today as ever. You really see the isolation experienced by military families when dad (and now, sometimes, mom) is off in the field. Beyond the absences, there is the transient nature of life, in which you are constantly uprooted and forced to move to a new place. And once you get to that place, you have to exist in a strictly defined social sphere (think John Ford's Fort Apache) where every relationship you have is predicated on rank. Meyer is at his best in evoking the far flung garrisons to which Damon is assigned. These are mostly distant, rundown garrisons that began as 19th century outposts guarding the frontier from Indians.
[T:]hey were at Fort Hardee, where life was certainly real if it wasn't earnest. Sam got three cots that first day, two for the bedroom and one for the living room, and she made couch covers out of muslin she dyed a deep blue in the washtub...They painted and mended and glued and sewed; they surprised each other with their skills, evoked each other's praise. The little backyard with its sunflowers drooping in the baked earth was hopeless...
I thought Once An Eagle had a number of shortcomings. Foremost among them was a lack of memorable characters. Damon is fine as a centerpiece. He isn't dynamic in a true sense, but you spend so much time with him that you are practically forced to like him. Other than Damon, though, most characters walk-on and walk-off. There are two exceptions. The first is Damon's friend, Colonel Ben "Wolverine" Krisler; the second is Damon's enemy, General Cortney Massengale, who represents everything that Damon rails against. These two men never come alive, and serve strict dramatic purposes: Krisler as a sidekick, and Massengale as an antagonist and foil. Since there is no true plot, this being something of a bilungsroman, there are many slow-moving parts, especially at the beginning, where you have to wade through some clunky expositional dialogue and hasty explanations before Damon enlists.
Still, the overall effect of this book, perhaps due to its heroic length, is quite powerful. It gives you the full sweep of a life of service, with its many sacrifices and few tangible rewards.
By the end, when General Damon goes to Vietnam as an observer, you have seen the American Army as it should be (dedicated officers like Damon, who shares the danger and cares for his men) positioned athwart the American Army as it soon will be (filled with angry draftees who will be thinking about fragging their officers).
It's hard to tell if Meyer is making a plea, or marking the passing of an era.
June 14, 2017
I've read this several times, including as a young officer. It was the only novel on the Professional Military Education (PME) reading list for the 101st ABN Div when I was assigned to it in early '80s. It is simply the best look at military leadership I have ever read. While the differences between the two main characters is so sharply drawn as to be slightly unrealistic, it is still an excellent look at what it is to be a leader rather than just a manager.
I think we all have a little of both characters in us. I just try to bring the Damon side out more :)
The novel follows the main character from pre WWI and his enlistment in the Army through to the build up to Viet Nam.
I can't recommend this highly enough.
I think we all have a little of both characters in us. I just try to bring the Damon side out more :)
The novel follows the main character from pre WWI and his enlistment in the Army through to the build up to Viet Nam.
I can't recommend this highly enough.
July 18, 2015
I rated this book so low because of the expectations I had going in. So many military folks talk about what a great primer this book is on leadership, and I simply didn't find that to be the case. Overall, I am indifferent to this book for a couple of reasons:
1. The two contrasting main characters are overblown exaggerations of real human characteristics. Sam Damon is unfailingly brave, concerned only about others, and though he has moments of tactical doubt he never doubts his convictions (even when cheating on his wife!). Massengale is duplicitous, self-aggrandizing, and will sacrifice anyone on the altar of his own ambition. While there are certainly leaders like both men, the reality of all people is somewhere in the middle. I understand that polar opposites drive narratives, but it also diminishes the book's value as a teaching tool about how to lead when things are truly difficult or when faced with morally ambiguous situations. War, like life, is simply not as black and white as this book would have it.
2. This book ignores the fact that naked ambition and concern only for outcomes is certainly a morally unattractive quality, but is likely necessary in the ugly crucible of war. Many of the world's finest commanders were shamelessly ambitious, and a certain disregard for other may very well be necessary when contemplating actions that will lead to the deaths of thousands. Caesar, Napoleon, Patton, MacArthur, and countless other commanders were more concerned with accomplishing a mission than the love and adoration of their troops. While morally questionable, and distasteful to the rank and file, it was exactly this quality in part that allowed these commanders to be so successful.
3. I had a really hard time suspending my disbelief on one point in particular. Sam Damon is supposed to have a reputation as a cantankerous, disagreeable malcontent who challenges authority, and is relegated to a mediocre career as a result. He's a freaking Lieutenant General! All military officers should be so fortunate, and I can't buy off on his being a disfavored officer of middling reputation when he's a dang three star!
4. Stylistically, Myrer loves similes and metaphors, and I swear every third sentence was one or the other. It gets awfully tiresome, and makes the book unnecessarily long. Sometimes it's better to just get to the damn point.
1. The two contrasting main characters are overblown exaggerations of real human characteristics. Sam Damon is unfailingly brave, concerned only about others, and though he has moments of tactical doubt he never doubts his convictions (even when cheating on his wife!). Massengale is duplicitous, self-aggrandizing, and will sacrifice anyone on the altar of his own ambition. While there are certainly leaders like both men, the reality of all people is somewhere in the middle. I understand that polar opposites drive narratives, but it also diminishes the book's value as a teaching tool about how to lead when things are truly difficult or when faced with morally ambiguous situations. War, like life, is simply not as black and white as this book would have it.
2. This book ignores the fact that naked ambition and concern only for outcomes is certainly a morally unattractive quality, but is likely necessary in the ugly crucible of war. Many of the world's finest commanders were shamelessly ambitious, and a certain disregard for other may very well be necessary when contemplating actions that will lead to the deaths of thousands. Caesar, Napoleon, Patton, MacArthur, and countless other commanders were more concerned with accomplishing a mission than the love and adoration of their troops. While morally questionable, and distasteful to the rank and file, it was exactly this quality in part that allowed these commanders to be so successful.
3. I had a really hard time suspending my disbelief on one point in particular. Sam Damon is supposed to have a reputation as a cantankerous, disagreeable malcontent who challenges authority, and is relegated to a mediocre career as a result. He's a freaking Lieutenant General! All military officers should be so fortunate, and I can't buy off on his being a disfavored officer of middling reputation when he's a dang three star!
4. Stylistically, Myrer loves similes and metaphors, and I swear every third sentence was one or the other. It gets awfully tiresome, and makes the book unnecessarily long. Sometimes it's better to just get to the damn point.
January 4, 2017
This book has been sitting on my shelf for 5 years at home and I am very angry at myself for only reading it now. This is a truly amazing book and has so many life lessons in there. I was not in the military, but you can take so many lessons from this book into the business and the sporting world and shows what it takes to be a really great leader.
The character of the protagonist, Sam Damon, is also the best character I have ever had in a book. He is a great leader and a real hero, but he also has his own flaws which makes him more relatable than most fiction heroes out there. And I like that this book is so long as you really see the character develop through his six decades in the military and also all the people he meets and influences along the way. The author also makes the story more exciting when taking the first person viewpoint of many characters throughout the book.
In the end it is kind of a sad book and brings forward the many realities of life. I think everyone has a Courtney Massengale in his life that he has to overcome and I certainly know I have. A great book and this would be my "desert island" book if I had to choose one.
The character of the protagonist, Sam Damon, is also the best character I have ever had in a book. He is a great leader and a real hero, but he also has his own flaws which makes him more relatable than most fiction heroes out there. And I like that this book is so long as you really see the character develop through his six decades in the military and also all the people he meets and influences along the way. The author also makes the story more exciting when taking the first person viewpoint of many characters throughout the book.
In the end it is kind of a sad book and brings forward the many realities of life. I think everyone has a Courtney Massengale in his life that he has to overcome and I certainly know I have. A great book and this would be my "desert island" book if I had to choose one.
March 17, 2012
This is perhaps my all-time favorite book. Like many a young second lieutenant, I often stopped for a "what would Sam do?" moment when faced with tough situations. This is the quintessential novel about leadership and honor and the American soldier. "Sad Sam" Damon, who shuns the advice of everyone as a young man to pursue a military career, doggedly sticks out the drudgery of being an enlisted man pre-World War I, believing fully in destiny and that he will find his in the army. And does he ever, along the way serving as the vehicle for Myers to draw a stark contrast between the idealistic Damon, who serves for love of country, and his arch-rival Courtney Massengale, who is ruled first and always by ambition. It does make you burn that Sam is always second fiddle to Massengale, when Damon is so clearly a better soldier and a better man. The mini-series based on this book corrected this injustice; the book is more realistic and more honest, making Damon ultimately human instead of the perfect white knight even his troops believe him to be. This book is about war and never glorifies it; it is about peace and how so many people who have never fought a war so blithely pursue the next one. And, ultimately, it is about the military and the people who choose it for a career and all the people they love. The scope is huge and yet the cast is fairly small, making it an intimate novel in many ways while covering an immense amount of ground and 50 years in time.
I believe I read once that Once an Eagle is required reading at West Point. If it isn't, it should be. It should also be required reading for corporate leadership courses to understand what true leadership is, as opposed to "management", and what real "people skills" are.
Highly recommended.
I believe I read once that Once an Eagle is required reading at West Point. If it isn't, it should be. It should also be required reading for corporate leadership courses to understand what true leadership is, as opposed to "management", and what real "people skills" are.
Highly recommended.
October 29, 2023
This was quite a read and is now one of my all time favorite military fiction. Once an Eagle is up there with War and Peace, Battle Cry and Matterhorn. Anton Myrer pulls no punches. He doesn't glorify war or the men who fight. But he does identify the heroes and the villains, and he speaks of those who are caught in the machine of war. An incredible story. Worth the time invested to read.
October 3, 2018
Someone mentioned this book recently, and it sent a shiver up my spine. I can't remember when I read it - could it really have been more than 40 years ago?
What I do know is that I read this book before the Army put me through college, before I ever jumped out of an airplane, and before any of my military training or service (active or reserve).
How memorable, inspirational, and formative was the book? After this many years, I can't say with any exactitude. But, to my young, impressionable mind, I fear that this book taught me as much about service and discipline and honor - about what kind of soldier, leader, and man I wanted to be - as any ROTC, Army service school, or military history course or program.
The transformative power of fiction.... Wow.
A funny aside: my cloudy recollection is that the book was - far and away - the longest I'd read at that point in my life. I remember my father - my role model in the Army and in life - handing me the book and (me) thinking I couldn't possibly get through it. I did get through it, and I'm glad I did.
Alas, I have no idea whatsoever how well the book has stood the test of time. (Having said that, plenty of baby boomer senior leaders/officers continue to recommend it and include it on military reading lists.) Nor can I represent how much I would enjoy it today, jaded by years of experience and stripped of my youthful naivete and optimism.
So, for now, I'm going to place it on my favorites shelf and leave it there, frozen in time.
What I do know is that I read this book before the Army put me through college, before I ever jumped out of an airplane, and before any of my military training or service (active or reserve).
How memorable, inspirational, and formative was the book? After this many years, I can't say with any exactitude. But, to my young, impressionable mind, I fear that this book taught me as much about service and discipline and honor - about what kind of soldier, leader, and man I wanted to be - as any ROTC, Army service school, or military history course or program.
The transformative power of fiction.... Wow.
A funny aside: my cloudy recollection is that the book was - far and away - the longest I'd read at that point in my life. I remember my father - my role model in the Army and in life - handing me the book and (me) thinking I couldn't possibly get through it. I did get through it, and I'm glad I did.
Alas, I have no idea whatsoever how well the book has stood the test of time. (Having said that, plenty of baby boomer senior leaders/officers continue to recommend it and include it on military reading lists.) Nor can I represent how much I would enjoy it today, jaded by years of experience and stripped of my youthful naivete and optimism.
So, for now, I'm going to place it on my favorites shelf and leave it there, frozen in time.
May 4, 2012
Myrer's mammoth novel is an engaging, disciplined, and, ultimately, powerful examination of American military life—its hardships and demands, its rewards and sacrifices, its meaning and tragedies, its uses and abuses—as filtered through the evolving life story of Sam Damon: raw and naïve recruit in the First World War, seasoned veteran in the Second, despairing old schooler in the looming presence of the Vietnam folly. Damon meets his diametric archetype in Courtney Massengale, his coeval and lifelong counterimage, a man born to privilege and well-connected within the military network who will, perforce, rise higher up the chain than Damon, assume greater responsibilities, without ever having been required to give much of himself other than time. Sam, a career soldier who works his way to an officer's rank by way of gruntdom, is the ideal American GI: brave, resolute, honorable, resourceful, thoughtful, and—perhaps most important of all—honest. Sam is a combat officer, leading his men in the field of battle from the front; Courtney a staff officer, who crafts the plans from the rear echelon that will send the likes of Sam into the fires of hell. Myrer is positioning here two species of military men and delineating the effect, ofttimes wide-ranging, that each brings to bear upon the wars America was called upon to fight in the twentieth century.
In the battlefields of World War I, young Damon finds a father figure in the wise and mentoring Colonel Caldwell; this bond only grows tighter when, in the postwar years, Damon marries Caldwell's daughter, Tommy. Other reviews have announced that Tommy was a poorly-drawn character, flat and lacking substance. It may very well be that I don't know all that much about people, especially women—or, at least, many years ago when I blazed through this bad boy, ere the interweb had shorted the speed relays within my mental reading circuitry—but I held that Tommy was a vivid presence, a strong-willed, practical woman, full of common sense and an invaluable partner to her husband, who suffered as the wife of a junior officer in Depression America—surviving on a meagre salary, living in decrepit assigned military housing, chafing at the banal role expected of her by other officer's spouses—but always managed to make it work. She's also a skeptical bulwark to set against the enthusiasms and occasionally narrowly-focussed perspectives of her military father and husband, the voice of civilian America that strives to remind these servicemen, sometimes exasperatedly, that we need to set the domestic table before we can praise God and pass the ammunition. In many ways, Tommy was the stateside and familial linchpin that connected Sam to the humanity that existed outside of rank and uniform; her husband, who passes a considerable portion of the book overseas, fighting against the Germans, the Japanese, and the power-blind Massengale—finds a constant reminder in his wife of what, exactly, motivates him to put his life on the line in the name of a duty that such as Courtney value quite cheaply.
As can readily be imagined, there are myriad ways a novel of this type—especially one that clocks in at a formidable thirteen hundred pages—could go wrong; but Myrer, for the most part, avoids the pitfalls. He's a thoroughly competent writer, and if the interwar scenes can at times unfold in a routine narrative that might glaze the eyes of others (I found the whole shebang to be enjoyable), he excels, as would only be expected, when the stage shifts to the French fields of WWI and the sweltering Pacific Islands of WWII. Damon himself grows both on the pages and upon the reader—and if such a stalwart, dutiful man can tend towards revealing himself to be a touch plodding, occasionally prone to temper flares, possessed of a cramped side when away from the battlefields and military routine and forced to deal with the minutiae of the quotidian, his core is of a thoroughly decent man who shines under pressure and always attempts do the right thing, as he determines it. He's not a saint, he's not John Wayne, he's capable of his own calculating nature, he and Tommy share some tumultuous arguments over dueling outlooks on life's demands, and he makes decisions—especially one forced upon him after a ferociously contested offensive against a powerful Japanese position that was callously scripted by the cooly loathsome Courtney—that will continue to haunt him long after the war itself has been concluded.
In the final stretch, when steadily applied pressure from Massengale and his cronies, ensconced within the ranks of those pushing for an armed American intervention in Vietnam, refuses to break Sam, he must face the possibility of his entire life of service being encapsulated as periodic episodes in crankery; and, when you consider all of the evidence, do the Massengalean factions of the world actually have the right view of things? Myrer is a skilled enough storyteller to allow all sides, believing they are right, to be persuasive; that we cheer for Damon, pull for Damon, like Damon, is a testament to something vital that endures within the beating heart of human nature. That core essence, accessed and allowed to blossom, is what permits the United States' insanely armed and sized military to operate with its human face visible; its soldiers to hate what they have committed to enduring, even whilst convinced that commitment is an essential component of the responsibility of being an independent republic. Myrer's book laments that, under the guidance of an elite that has nested itself on high for all of the wrong reasons—and a compelled soldiery resentful of this guidance pressing down upon their reluctance—this may be in danger of disappearing, or at least being altered into something metastasized or feral. Once an Eagle would certainly not be everybody's cup of tea, but its thoughtfulness and readability may surprise some people.
In the battlefields of World War I, young Damon finds a father figure in the wise and mentoring Colonel Caldwell; this bond only grows tighter when, in the postwar years, Damon marries Caldwell's daughter, Tommy. Other reviews have announced that Tommy was a poorly-drawn character, flat and lacking substance. It may very well be that I don't know all that much about people, especially women—or, at least, many years ago when I blazed through this bad boy, ere the interweb had shorted the speed relays within my mental reading circuitry—but I held that Tommy was a vivid presence, a strong-willed, practical woman, full of common sense and an invaluable partner to her husband, who suffered as the wife of a junior officer in Depression America—surviving on a meagre salary, living in decrepit assigned military housing, chafing at the banal role expected of her by other officer's spouses—but always managed to make it work. She's also a skeptical bulwark to set against the enthusiasms and occasionally narrowly-focussed perspectives of her military father and husband, the voice of civilian America that strives to remind these servicemen, sometimes exasperatedly, that we need to set the domestic table before we can praise God and pass the ammunition. In many ways, Tommy was the stateside and familial linchpin that connected Sam to the humanity that existed outside of rank and uniform; her husband, who passes a considerable portion of the book overseas, fighting against the Germans, the Japanese, and the power-blind Massengale—finds a constant reminder in his wife of what, exactly, motivates him to put his life on the line in the name of a duty that such as Courtney value quite cheaply.
As can readily be imagined, there are myriad ways a novel of this type—especially one that clocks in at a formidable thirteen hundred pages—could go wrong; but Myrer, for the most part, avoids the pitfalls. He's a thoroughly competent writer, and if the interwar scenes can at times unfold in a routine narrative that might glaze the eyes of others (I found the whole shebang to be enjoyable), he excels, as would only be expected, when the stage shifts to the French fields of WWI and the sweltering Pacific Islands of WWII. Damon himself grows both on the pages and upon the reader—and if such a stalwart, dutiful man can tend towards revealing himself to be a touch plodding, occasionally prone to temper flares, possessed of a cramped side when away from the battlefields and military routine and forced to deal with the minutiae of the quotidian, his core is of a thoroughly decent man who shines under pressure and always attempts do the right thing, as he determines it. He's not a saint, he's not John Wayne, he's capable of his own calculating nature, he and Tommy share some tumultuous arguments over dueling outlooks on life's demands, and he makes decisions—especially one forced upon him after a ferociously contested offensive against a powerful Japanese position that was callously scripted by the cooly loathsome Courtney—that will continue to haunt him long after the war itself has been concluded.
In the final stretch, when steadily applied pressure from Massengale and his cronies, ensconced within the ranks of those pushing for an armed American intervention in Vietnam, refuses to break Sam, he must face the possibility of his entire life of service being encapsulated as periodic episodes in crankery; and, when you consider all of the evidence, do the Massengalean factions of the world actually have the right view of things? Myrer is a skilled enough storyteller to allow all sides, believing they are right, to be persuasive; that we cheer for Damon, pull for Damon, like Damon, is a testament to something vital that endures within the beating heart of human nature. That core essence, accessed and allowed to blossom, is what permits the United States' insanely armed and sized military to operate with its human face visible; its soldiers to hate what they have committed to enduring, even whilst convinced that commitment is an essential component of the responsibility of being an independent republic. Myrer's book laments that, under the guidance of an elite that has nested itself on high for all of the wrong reasons—and a compelled soldiery resentful of this guidance pressing down upon their reluctance—this may be in danger of disappearing, or at least being altered into something metastasized or feral. Once an Eagle would certainly not be everybody's cup of tea, but its thoughtfulness and readability may surprise some people.
February 27, 2012
My old boss Jim Rutherford said this was one of his favorite books and since he had great taste in literature I was curious. My dad had an original copy and said he loved the book as well and that it had been required reading as part of his military work...War College perhaps? Well...the copy my dad had was big and heavy...about 800 pages and for any DC metro goer...you know that it is real real hard to carry a book like that. I tried to find it on kindle but no luck and then I tried to convince myself I would just read it at home again no luck...it was too good!
I felt like as an Army brat growing up on base after base, I had a very limited idea of what military life was all about. My mom would say things every now and then but I sometimes feel this strong desire to read books like this to just help me understand what soldiers go through since I will never experience it myself. I feel the same about war movies...I just feel like I need to watch as many as I can to try and wrap my mind around everything. I recently watched Patton and I am so glad I did, because it gave me a totally different idea about WWII than I had ever considered. Books like All Quiet on the West Front or A Soldier of the Great War...there are some amazing books out there and I have added Once an Eagle to my list of favorites.
While most books I have read cover just 1 war, this book covers WWI, and WWII and towards the end touches on conflicts rising out of our desire to crush the spread of Communism. The main character Sam Damon grew up hearing stories of those who had served in the miliary and felt strongly compelled to join up. He is by far a perfect man and some of the decisions he had to make were very hard. I liked that this book showed how military life affected people in different ways but that ultimately you and you alone have to live with your decisions for a very long time. It was interesting to watch him struggle with family life in the Army as well. This is not something that most books cover...they might cover the soldier reuniting with his love or perhaps she has been unfaithful but what about the soldier who drags his family all over the place to base after base when some of those places are really hard to live in? Trying to balance being a dutiful solider and dutiful husband is hard on everyone.
It is interesting to study and consider all of the politics that go into military careers. Certainly, we have all seen the movie where our golden hero has an enemy within the ranks but we usually don't think about this on a larger scale. People want to be recognized and commended for their work and they also want power. How the Army generals interacted with each other, with the other U.S. military forces and with military leaders in other countries is fascinating.
I was really sucked into this book by all the discussions of not just tactical and strategic maneuvers but how short those plans can fall when you lack the leadership to carry them out. How do you get men to rush an oncoming enemy? How do you keep them motivated when they are wounded, tired, hungry, and death is the likely outcome of their onslaught?
Obviously, I could keep writing and writing about the book but I will try to end with this last item. I was delighted by all of the colloquial sayings in the book that I had never heard before. I had to keep asking Jim and my dad what they meant!
Sowing the dragon's teeth
Bearding a lion
These are just a few :0)
The book was written beautifully...the author had such a mastery over his words that I would often read a sentence a few times...the way you would look at a favorite piece of art for a long time.
I felt like as an Army brat growing up on base after base, I had a very limited idea of what military life was all about. My mom would say things every now and then but I sometimes feel this strong desire to read books like this to just help me understand what soldiers go through since I will never experience it myself. I feel the same about war movies...I just feel like I need to watch as many as I can to try and wrap my mind around everything. I recently watched Patton and I am so glad I did, because it gave me a totally different idea about WWII than I had ever considered. Books like All Quiet on the West Front or A Soldier of the Great War...there are some amazing books out there and I have added Once an Eagle to my list of favorites.
While most books I have read cover just 1 war, this book covers WWI, and WWII and towards the end touches on conflicts rising out of our desire to crush the spread of Communism. The main character Sam Damon grew up hearing stories of those who had served in the miliary and felt strongly compelled to join up. He is by far a perfect man and some of the decisions he had to make were very hard. I liked that this book showed how military life affected people in different ways but that ultimately you and you alone have to live with your decisions for a very long time. It was interesting to watch him struggle with family life in the Army as well. This is not something that most books cover...they might cover the soldier reuniting with his love or perhaps she has been unfaithful but what about the soldier who drags his family all over the place to base after base when some of those places are really hard to live in? Trying to balance being a dutiful solider and dutiful husband is hard on everyone.
It is interesting to study and consider all of the politics that go into military careers. Certainly, we have all seen the movie where our golden hero has an enemy within the ranks but we usually don't think about this on a larger scale. People want to be recognized and commended for their work and they also want power. How the Army generals interacted with each other, with the other U.S. military forces and with military leaders in other countries is fascinating.
I was really sucked into this book by all the discussions of not just tactical and strategic maneuvers but how short those plans can fall when you lack the leadership to carry them out. How do you get men to rush an oncoming enemy? How do you keep them motivated when they are wounded, tired, hungry, and death is the likely outcome of their onslaught?
Obviously, I could keep writing and writing about the book but I will try to end with this last item. I was delighted by all of the colloquial sayings in the book that I had never heard before. I had to keep asking Jim and my dad what they meant!
Sowing the dragon's teeth
Bearding a lion
These are just a few :0)
The book was written beautifully...the author had such a mastery over his words that I would often read a sentence a few times...the way you would look at a favorite piece of art for a long time.
August 21, 2017
A very good read on military leadership, soldiering, military family life, friendships, and above all how to lead, the book follows the career of Sam Damon from WWI to Viet Nam. The chapter on the New Guinea Campaign is harrowing, humorous at times, and some parts made me misty eyed, Myrer's writing is so descriptive, I was looking for a poncho.
Myrer's hammers home two distinct leadership styles:
Damon who started off as an enlisted man (EM), cares for the troops, is empathic, trains his units hards, pushes hard, and parties hard, he's not all that concerned about glory, politicking, networking to gain rank and power and leads by example continuously show's moral courage.
Messengale on the other hand is a REMF, stays back out of the fight while riding the coattails of the front line commanders and soldiers, he's the one more concerned with his image than making sound decisions, surrounds himself with sycophants, and riding roughshod over subordinates who does not agree with him, holds grudges, and never commanded at platoon level, company level on up in combat on the front lines.
I highly recommend this book if your in the military or not, it's just as much about leadership for civilians.
Myrer's hammers home two distinct leadership styles:
Damon who started off as an enlisted man (EM), cares for the troops, is empathic, trains his units hards, pushes hard, and parties hard, he's not all that concerned about glory, politicking, networking to gain rank and power and leads by example continuously show's moral courage.
Messengale on the other hand is a REMF, stays back out of the fight while riding the coattails of the front line commanders and soldiers, he's the one more concerned with his image than making sound decisions, surrounds himself with sycophants, and riding roughshod over subordinates who does not agree with him, holds grudges, and never commanded at platoon level, company level on up in combat on the front lines.
I highly recommend this book if your in the military or not, it's just as much about leadership for civilians.
December 10, 2012
One of the five books that I thought every officer should read. This ia a classic that became popular in the late 80s and early 90s. This epic novel is follows the lives of two army officers from WWI to the Vietnam era. It was made into a mini-series in the 70’s and has been reprinted by the Army War College. Myrer has taken some of the most outstanding combat leadership of WWII (Darby, York, Truscott, Eichelberger, etc..) and crafted it into a historical novel of epic proportions, centering on his ideals of good and bad officership. For an entire generation of officer’s, this novel defined a standard of ethical conduct. Mandatory read for anyone considering a career in the Army.
May 28, 2018
I was thinking about what military fiction would be appropriate on Memorial Day and this title came to mind. It's a classic, with fictional characters arcing through history, from World War I up until our entry into Vietnam. Sam Damon, the protagonist, enlists, wins the Medal of Honor in World War I, then spends his time in the lean years up until he has to go fight in World War II.
As a veteran I find the way his career track and that of his nemesis, Courtney Massengele, cross paths over the years. The sacrifice of both the peace time and war time army is eloquently covered.
While Myrer fictionalizes even some of the history, the core of the book rings true.
A great, epic read, that I highly recommend.
As a veteran I find the way his career track and that of his nemesis, Courtney Massengele, cross paths over the years. The sacrifice of both the peace time and war time army is eloquently covered.
While Myrer fictionalizes even some of the history, the core of the book rings true.
A great, epic read, that I highly recommend.
July 11, 2009
Anything you want to know about war and leadership, here it is. Sam Damon is an idealistic boy who joins the army in 1916, wins the Medal of Honor and an officer's commission in France during World War I, stays in the army through World War II as a general, and ends finally as an observer and an old man in Vietnam. Sam is a terrific character: brave, strong, and true without being a cardboard white-hat hero. Contrasted against him is his lifelong enemy Massengale, a smooth operator who loathes Sam and everything he stands for. The author fought in the Pacific in World War II, so that section of Sam's war experiences has a particularly visceral tug. Another fascinating side-bar is the two years Sam spends in China as an observer to the Chinese guerillas. The book is fictional, but it is assigned reading at various military schools.
November 26, 2017
Wow - what a work. One of the most enlightening, honest, complex looks into soldiering I’ve ever read. No wonder General McCrystal gave it such high praise. It is as dense as it is long, but it doesn’t bog down. Over and over it reveals layers to the lives and struggles and mindsets of the American military family. And it is literary craftsmanship at its finest too. Magnificent book.
November 13, 2007
Two ways to lead, you figure which one you are. Classic tale of military life rings true to a military man. Also a great story.
September 19, 2023
After a month, I have ~finally~ finished this larger than life book that spans the career of a lifetime officer from WW1 to Vietnam. Much to my surprise, I really enjoyed this book and found myself invested in the characters and story (not a good idea to get invested in characters in a war novel).
I really appreciated this no-frills approach to military life both in war and peace-times and I would say is an incredibly accurate depiction of military family life and relationships. The main character, Sam Damon, is incredibly easy to like and I can understand why this book was required reading at West Point, as Sam exemplifies leadership in the best of ways. Although I wouldn’t necessarily recommend this book to folks sensitive to gore, death, or war-related topics, I can see why this book would appeal to people who are not serving in the military and have an interest in history and leadership. I enjoyed this more than I anticipated and I appreciated the anti-war sentiment portrayed overall.
I really appreciated this no-frills approach to military life both in war and peace-times and I would say is an incredibly accurate depiction of military family life and relationships. The main character, Sam Damon, is incredibly easy to like and I can understand why this book was required reading at West Point, as Sam exemplifies leadership in the best of ways. Although I wouldn’t necessarily recommend this book to folks sensitive to gore, death, or war-related topics, I can see why this book would appeal to people who are not serving in the military and have an interest in history and leadership. I enjoyed this more than I anticipated and I appreciated the anti-war sentiment portrayed overall.
August 21, 2012
I give this book 5 stars because it is extremely well written and engaging. However, I hated almost every minute of it. I read it in the first years of my husband's Army career and found it extremely depressing. The hero of the story is never fully appreciated by his military leadership, constantly being overlooked and overshadowed by a more charismatic officer, who probably could have coined the acronym 'CYA'. I see that many reviewers admired the character of Sam and wanted to be an Officer like him. I wish there were more of his like in today's Army; unfortunately, the author knew too well that the armed forces are populated by more Massengales than we would like to admit.
Supportive military wives: read it to understand what your husband is up against. Not just the combat, but the inner politicking that can break down a soldier or officer's desire to do what is best for country. It's an eye-opener.
October 29, 2016
This is a spectacular book. I purchased it because I was interested in the overview of the timeline of 20th-century wars, connected by the story of a career soldier. Due to its size and subject matter, I was more than halfway expecting something dry and tedious, with cardboard characters to illustrate the history. I couldn’t have been more wrong. This is a stellar and tragic epic, peopled with passionately real characters, ultimately singing a profound song of peace.
January 31, 2023
“In this book…(Myrer) helps contribute to the nation’s effort to ensure that a sufficiency of young men and women will consider the armed forces as their vehicle for service to the nation”
– Some General who wrote the Forward, and I couldn’t have said it better myself: this is Army propaganda that hides behind faux criticality of the Army’s worst members and practices.
This is probably the worst book I’ve ever read, and I’m not sure where to begin in lambasting it…so let’s start with the writing, because on top of all my issues with the book’s ideas (or lack thereof), at the end of the day this is simply not well written. The prose is pedestrian, and the understanding of how real people think, act, and speak is feeble at best. It may as well be a comic book for how accurately it portrays humans; everyone talks like a text book or a cartoon character. It’s like a long sparknotes version of a real novel. And Myrer is DYING to let us know how smart he is; his characters drop Shakespeare references and other quotes constantly and artlessly.
On top of that, the worst thing about Once an Eagle is that it is absolutely tensionless. In chapter one we are introduced to our hero, and instead of following a complex character we follow someone who is literally never wrong. He’s the ultimate Mary Sue. Not only that, but he is always proven right INSTANTLY. Every chapter is just him entering a situation and going “Oh I guess I don’t know anything… but here’s the exact answer to the problem at hand.” The whole book is just Sam facing a problem and everyone else slowly realizing he’s the smartest guy in the room. And somehow Myrer thinks its interesting to write his protagonists as fortune tellers and the antagonists as utter morons. It gets to the point where Sam is arguing that the Japanese will attack the US by surprise any day now and I thought to myself “oh great, here we go, Pearl Harbor is going to happen a few days from now”…but it happens 30 minutes from when Sam is called crazy for predicting it. Myrer can’t stand his characters not being right for any longer than that.
So, our protagonist…woof. Myrer thinks he’s writing the Army version of The Fountainhead, with an honorable man on one side and a dishonorable man on the other…but his protagonist, Sam, absolutely sucks. In The Fountainhead Roark actually stands for something and deals with the consequences of his integrity. Sam doesn’t stand for anything other than vague notions of “duty” (duty to what is never answered or interrogated), and in the pursuit of duty he sacrifices his family, ignores sexual assault and engages in victim blaming because he’s supposed to “respect the rank”, gets his best friend killed, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. He also looks down on any member of society that’s not the military (the press, businessmen, even Military Police members are worthless in Sam’s view of the world) and confuses a lack of ambition as somehow being honorable. He makes his wife and family miserable by staying in the Army, and when pushed on it simply states IDK, “I just feel like my place is here,” excusing the Army’s worst elements. And we’re supposed to root for this unthinking moron? Give me a break.
If you are curious at all as to how Myrer writes women, the first thought his female lead, Tommy, has after agreeing to marry our protagonist is “What if I should fail him” and then not long after she reflects that her “papa will be pleased.” And that about sums it up. Tommy is never allowed to do or think anything without immediately relating to the men in her life. For example, she saves her children by shooting a snake, and again her first thought is to reflect on the fact that her father taught her to shoot. She is constantly worrying whether or not she’s a good wife, despite her better judgement, while the male lead never spares a thought as to whether or not he is a good husband. Myrer’s sexism ages about as well as a glass of milk.
I was also disappointed to see that this doesn’t reckon with history at all. It would be interesting to see how someone who had fought in WWI would react to learning about the rumblings of WWII, but he’s not uncertain for a second there will be a war, and Myrer’s writing style is to just throw us into it without any thought about why or its impact.
Once An Eagle’s greatest crime though is that it is Army propaganda disguised as critique. Myrer clearly understands all of the Army’s failings, and acknowledges them, but not to chastise them, but to excuse them. If I had decided to stay in the army but had an inkling that I was wasting my time, this book would make me feel way better about it. It doesn’t point out flaws to mock them, it calls them out to say it’s not actually that bad. The army apology tour. This is a piece of masturbatory fiction that has probably made the world we live in worse and should not be read by anyone. Read War & Peace instead, I beg of you.
– Some General who wrote the Forward, and I couldn’t have said it better myself: this is Army propaganda that hides behind faux criticality of the Army’s worst members and practices.
This is probably the worst book I’ve ever read, and I’m not sure where to begin in lambasting it…so let’s start with the writing, because on top of all my issues with the book’s ideas (or lack thereof), at the end of the day this is simply not well written. The prose is pedestrian, and the understanding of how real people think, act, and speak is feeble at best. It may as well be a comic book for how accurately it portrays humans; everyone talks like a text book or a cartoon character. It’s like a long sparknotes version of a real novel. And Myrer is DYING to let us know how smart he is; his characters drop Shakespeare references and other quotes constantly and artlessly.
On top of that, the worst thing about Once an Eagle is that it is absolutely tensionless. In chapter one we are introduced to our hero, and instead of following a complex character we follow someone who is literally never wrong. He’s the ultimate Mary Sue. Not only that, but he is always proven right INSTANTLY. Every chapter is just him entering a situation and going “Oh I guess I don’t know anything… but here’s the exact answer to the problem at hand.” The whole book is just Sam facing a problem and everyone else slowly realizing he’s the smartest guy in the room. And somehow Myrer thinks its interesting to write his protagonists as fortune tellers and the antagonists as utter morons. It gets to the point where Sam is arguing that the Japanese will attack the US by surprise any day now and I thought to myself “oh great, here we go, Pearl Harbor is going to happen a few days from now”…but it happens 30 minutes from when Sam is called crazy for predicting it. Myrer can’t stand his characters not being right for any longer than that.
So, our protagonist…woof. Myrer thinks he’s writing the Army version of The Fountainhead, with an honorable man on one side and a dishonorable man on the other…but his protagonist, Sam, absolutely sucks. In The Fountainhead Roark actually stands for something and deals with the consequences of his integrity. Sam doesn’t stand for anything other than vague notions of “duty” (duty to what is never answered or interrogated), and in the pursuit of duty he sacrifices his family, ignores sexual assault and engages in victim blaming because he’s supposed to “respect the rank”, gets his best friend killed, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. He also looks down on any member of society that’s not the military (the press, businessmen, even Military Police members are worthless in Sam’s view of the world) and confuses a lack of ambition as somehow being honorable. He makes his wife and family miserable by staying in the Army, and when pushed on it simply states IDK, “I just feel like my place is here,” excusing the Army’s worst elements. And we’re supposed to root for this unthinking moron? Give me a break.
If you are curious at all as to how Myrer writes women, the first thought his female lead, Tommy, has after agreeing to marry our protagonist is “What if I should fail him” and then not long after she reflects that her “papa will be pleased.” And that about sums it up. Tommy is never allowed to do or think anything without immediately relating to the men in her life. For example, she saves her children by shooting a snake, and again her first thought is to reflect on the fact that her father taught her to shoot. She is constantly worrying whether or not she’s a good wife, despite her better judgement, while the male lead never spares a thought as to whether or not he is a good husband. Myrer’s sexism ages about as well as a glass of milk.
I was also disappointed to see that this doesn’t reckon with history at all. It would be interesting to see how someone who had fought in WWI would react to learning about the rumblings of WWII, but he’s not uncertain for a second there will be a war, and Myrer’s writing style is to just throw us into it without any thought about why or its impact.
Once An Eagle’s greatest crime though is that it is Army propaganda disguised as critique. Myrer clearly understands all of the Army’s failings, and acknowledges them, but not to chastise them, but to excuse them. If I had decided to stay in the army but had an inkling that I was wasting my time, this book would make me feel way better about it. It doesn’t point out flaws to mock them, it calls them out to say it’s not actually that bad. The army apology tour. This is a piece of masturbatory fiction that has probably made the world we live in worse and should not be read by anyone. Read War & Peace instead, I beg of you.
January 7, 2012
(IMHO, few books deserve five stars. I'd give this book six stars if I could. Go out to Amazon, and look at the distribution of reviews. Virtually EVERYONE who reads this massive book rates it five stars. You should read it. Period.)
I love this book. I read it for the first time probably 10-20 years ago, and find that I can easily open it at any point and get engrossed again in Sam Damon's journey. It's just this incredibly broad and rich tapestry.
What I think I love most about this book is Sam's approach to life, in that you take what's in front of you, do the best that you can, learn from the experience--without reframing it as someone else's fault--and throughout life, keep trying to learn (languages, history, etc.). I don't do nearly as well at this as I'd like--cruising the Internet is easier than using it to work on learning French at 50, for example--but I try, and Sam is my hero, someone who I try to emulate and whose fictional tale makes me strive to be better than I am.
In modern life, we seemed to be surrounded by people who talk and talk and talk, but are *completely* unable to live their values. Instead, their mantra is "I've changed" or "I've learned from my mistakes." Maybe we as a society should look for people who are able to manage themselves with honor and dignity, rather than listening to those who put themselves forward as "leaders" but who fold like cheap card tables at the first test of their character.
I love this book. I read it for the first time probably 10-20 years ago, and find that I can easily open it at any point and get engrossed again in Sam Damon's journey. It's just this incredibly broad and rich tapestry.
What I think I love most about this book is Sam's approach to life, in that you take what's in front of you, do the best that you can, learn from the experience--without reframing it as someone else's fault--and throughout life, keep trying to learn (languages, history, etc.). I don't do nearly as well at this as I'd like--cruising the Internet is easier than using it to work on learning French at 50, for example--but I try, and Sam is my hero, someone who I try to emulate and whose fictional tale makes me strive to be better than I am.
In modern life, we seemed to be surrounded by people who talk and talk and talk, but are *completely* unable to live their values. Instead, their mantra is "I've changed" or "I've learned from my mistakes." Maybe we as a society should look for people who are able to manage themselves with honor and dignity, rather than listening to those who put themselves forward as "leaders" but who fold like cheap card tables at the first test of their character.
May 8, 2017
I first read this book when I was in high school, then read it again several years later, and a for a third time about ten years ago. I thought it was a great book when I was 16/17, pretty good when I was 25, and marginal when I was in my 40s. It's not bad when you're more idealistic than experienced, but it is hardly the 'great novel' of American soldiering. Anton Myrer gave his characters some personal flaws but made them black/white or good/evil on the battlefield. In my 32 years of soldiering, I found most officers to be somewhat the reverse; that is, they were less than stellar on the battlefield but led reasonably virtuous personal lives. This was true in my personal experience as well as in the biographies of historical figures. The point is this: Once an Eagle is a romantic view of what it was like to be an American soldier during the first half of the 20th century. To that end, it succeeds. After all, it is a novel. However, as an example of soldiering and human behavior, it falls far short. As recently as 2012, this book was on the annual reading list recommended by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. To be blunt, it doesn't belong there. It might have in 1968, but not now. Guy Sajer's "The Forgotten Soldier" (which itself has many detractors, some justifiable) and Erich Maria Remarque's "All Quiet on the Eastern Front" are far better book about what it means to be a soldier on any battlefield and in almost any war.
August 30, 2017
Too black and white. The rigid military ideals are presented to us in the form of the heroic Sam Damon, who, like his father-in-law, knows all, even the future, which I assume is to mean that if people like him were in charge all the world's problems would be solved when or possibly before they present themselves. As a story it is quite uninteresting, as a starting point for leadership qualities to be looked for in a military man the book fulfills it's mission, it's incredibly long-winded mind-numbing mission. Way too long. I enjoy long books but this should have been about 300 pages shorter, 1/3 of the book served essentially no purpose, à la Robert Jordan.
December 26, 2018
Read "Once An Eagle" in late '70s. Impressed then but unsure if would award 5-stars with re-read. My family had career military men, WWII and beyond. My USAF service memories mostly good ... but, I can't remember contents. The local library still has copy. Alas, seeing it while browsing, I'm intimidated ... demote a star
July 7, 2016
As an Army Brat with several family members and friends either in the US Military or formerly in the US Military, I consider myself reasonably aware of the classics, and the popular choices, of Military Fiction. Imagine my surprise when, in a discussion a few weeks' back about good military fiction versus bad military fiction, a book called
Once an Eagle by Anton Myrer came up in conversation (it is Required Reading for Officer Candidate School, apparently).
Since I had a business trip with several long flights in my immediate future, and a Barnes & Noble credit sufficient to purchase this book for my Nook app, I did so and read it over the next few weeks. Having read it, my take is that this book is a well-researched history of the US Army in the early-mid Twentieth Century - and as a work of fiction, more than a bit on the disjointed side, and featuring characters that seem to have one to one-and-a-half sides to them at best.
The story follows the life and adventures of Sam Damon, All-American Boy from a hardscrabble background: His father died young, so he's had to work two jobs since he was in his teens - but still has time to be a High School Football and Baseball Star Player, as well as being better read on military history than most West Point grads. During WWI, as a Sergeant, he wins the Medal of Honor and is promoted to Lieutenant for pretty much single-handedly rescuing the remnants of his destroyed squad and other captured American soldiers, single-handedly taking out two or three squads of Germans, then single-handedly pulling his rag-tag cohort together to turn a French farmhouse taken over by now-dead (or captured) Germans into a fortress of sufficient strength to kill off even more Germans when they counterattack.
Honestly, Captain America couldn't have done better.
Eventually rising to the brevet rank of Major during WWI, he falls in love with and marries Tommy, the only daughter of Gen. George Caldwell who Damon deeply admires - and they try adjusting to peacetime military life (of which I'm all too familiar), where they meet West Point Graduate, Staff Officer Extraordinaire, McArthur subordinate/crony Courtney Massengale, whose name reminds me of a cross between "Percy Dovetonsils" and a feminine hygiene product.
Nearly Every Review of ONCE AN EAGLE Depicts Massengale This Way....
Once WWII rolls around (Pearl Harbor's attacked while the Damons are on TDY in San Diego), Sam immediately leaps into action - rallying disheartened troops and driving the Japanese back from various Pacific islands through his uniquely heroic combination of clever-but-daring tactics, an almost-supernatural ability to read the Japanese Commanders he faces' intentions, and
Massengale, meanwhile, is promoted over Damon repeatedly because he's schmoozing the Brass in Australia or Hawaii or Washington, DC - even though he's never led troops in the field in his life. He's also, we're informed in sections of the book devoted to his point of view, a glory hound with an inflated sense of his self-worth, a backbiter, an officer who doesn't care a wrap about his troops, a strategist in love with overly complicated battle plans that fall apart the instant they actually meet the enemy, a sadist - oh, and he prematurely ejaculates during sex, to boot.
What a Guy!
Okay, here are the reasons why I gave this book, which has a huge number of five-star reviews on Goodreads and just about everywhere, and is considered a classic of military literature, three stars - I don't believe the characters as I'm being told to believe them. While to be fair author Anton Myrer
, an ex-Marine who saw action in the Pacific during WWII, doesn't make Sam Damon perfect, exactly, he's always militarily right; if he does bad things in a political sense it's usually for the correct moral reasons; and even when he finally gets around to cheating on his wife with a nurse in Australia it's because she's made it clear she'll never forgive him for their son's death in combat - and besides, she was cheating on him as well!
As I Said Before - What a Guy!
Massengale, by contrast, doesn't have a single good point to him - in addition to all his faults listed above, he's a blackmailing cheating little slimeball...who nonetheless always wins against Manly Soldier-Man Damon! His smarmy villainy is laid on so thick that you're stunned he doesn't spend the entire book getting smacked down by all the Old Warhorse Soldiers he serves under - and, in my case, you hit a point where you wonder how, if that's all to him there is, "Captious Court" (as Sam and his friends call him) has consistently risen higher in rank than The Great Warrior Sam Damon.
But what about the women? That's a good question, actually - what about the women? The only one who gets any personal development is Tommy Caldwell Damon, Sam's wife - and by the end of the book I'm still not sure why they ever got married, let alone stayed married for what I'm assuming is a half-century! Despite being an Army Brat herself, pretty much raised by her father on his own at a succession of US military bases, Tommy is a artistic creative type who hates the military and the whole business of soldiering, and never misses an opportunity to tell us, and her fellow Army Wives, as much. She lets herself be seduced by Masssengale, whose West Point intellectualism she's attracted to, and nearly sleeps with him - except for that entire Premature Ejaculation thing, which causes him to call it off before it gets to, you know, sex.
Sometimes You Just Got to Go With the Fillion
Every other woman in this book is either a supportive Army Wife, a backbiting Army Wife, or a pair of cute young women (usually but not always nurses) who exist to tempt Sam and his Army buddy du jour into sex.
Most of those who praise this book point out how it's a "cautionary tale" against the Military/Industrial Complex and What A Good Officer and Gentleman really is. What I'm got is less that than a screed against REMFs, while praising Field Commanders to the skies - which works in the context of the story, but misses the point that Field Commanders, by the very nature of what they do, don't focus on anything larger than short-term tactical goals.
I would have liked this story better if it had had a third main character who stood between Sam Damon and Courtney Massengale - a Staff Officer who was interested in more than his personal glory and profit, with field command experience so soldiers could genuinely respect him, and who didn't shoot his mouth off (as Damon often does to his superiors) so his opinions actually got listened to. As it stands, Once an Eagle doesn't feel like it teaches the officers required to read it anything other than "Get out and fight!"
Once an Eagle by Anton Myrer came up in conversation (it is Required Reading for Officer Candidate School, apparently). Since I had a business trip with several long flights in my immediate future, and a Barnes & Noble credit sufficient to purchase this book for my Nook app, I did so and read it over the next few weeks. Having read it, my take is that this book is a well-researched history of the US Army in the early-mid Twentieth Century - and as a work of fiction, more than a bit on the disjointed side, and featuring characters that seem to have one to one-and-a-half sides to them at best.
The story follows the life and adventures of Sam Damon, All-American Boy from a hardscrabble background: His father died young, so he's had to work two jobs since he was in his teens - but still has time to be a High School Football and Baseball Star Player, as well as being better read on military history than most West Point grads. During WWI, as a Sergeant, he wins the Medal of Honor and is promoted to Lieutenant for pretty much single-handedly rescuing the remnants of his destroyed squad and other captured American soldiers, single-handedly taking out two or three squads of Germans, then single-handedly pulling his rag-tag cohort together to turn a French farmhouse taken over by now-dead (or captured) Germans into a fortress of sufficient strength to kill off even more Germans when they counterattack.
Honestly, Captain America couldn't have done better.
Eventually rising to the brevet rank of Major during WWI, he falls in love with and marries Tommy, the only daughter of Gen. George Caldwell who Damon deeply admires - and they try adjusting to peacetime military life (of which I'm all too familiar), where they meet West Point Graduate, Staff Officer Extraordinaire, McArthur subordinate/crony Courtney Massengale, whose name reminds me of a cross between "Percy Dovetonsils" and a feminine hygiene product.
Nearly Every Review of ONCE AN EAGLE Depicts Massengale This Way....
Once WWII rolls around (Pearl Harbor's attacked while the Damons are on TDY in San Diego), Sam immediately leaps into action - rallying disheartened troops and driving the Japanese back from various Pacific islands through his uniquely heroic combination of clever-but-daring tactics, an almost-supernatural ability to read the Japanese Commanders he faces' intentions, and
Massengale, meanwhile, is promoted over Damon repeatedly because he's schmoozing the Brass in Australia or Hawaii or Washington, DC - even though he's never led troops in the field in his life. He's also, we're informed in sections of the book devoted to his point of view, a glory hound with an inflated sense of his self-worth, a backbiter, an officer who doesn't care a wrap about his troops, a strategist in love with overly complicated battle plans that fall apart the instant they actually meet the enemy, a sadist - oh, and he prematurely ejaculates during sex, to boot.
What a Guy!
Okay, here are the reasons why I gave this book, which has a huge number of five-star reviews on Goodreads and just about everywhere, and is considered a classic of military literature, three stars - I don't believe the characters as I'm being told to believe them. While to be fair author Anton Myrer
, an ex-Marine who saw action in the Pacific during WWII, doesn't make Sam Damon perfect, exactly, he's always militarily right; if he does bad things in a political sense it's usually for the correct moral reasons; and even when he finally gets around to cheating on his wife with a nurse in Australia it's because she's made it clear she'll never forgive him for their son's death in combat - and besides, she was cheating on him as well! As I Said Before - What a Guy!
Massengale, by contrast, doesn't have a single good point to him - in addition to all his faults listed above, he's a blackmailing cheating little slimeball...who nonetheless always wins against Manly Soldier-Man Damon! His smarmy villainy is laid on so thick that you're stunned he doesn't spend the entire book getting smacked down by all the Old Warhorse Soldiers he serves under - and, in my case, you hit a point where you wonder how, if that's all to him there is, "Captious Court" (as Sam and his friends call him) has consistently risen higher in rank than The Great Warrior Sam Damon.
But what about the women? That's a good question, actually - what about the women? The only one who gets any personal development is Tommy Caldwell Damon, Sam's wife - and by the end of the book I'm still not sure why they ever got married, let alone stayed married for what I'm assuming is a half-century! Despite being an Army Brat herself, pretty much raised by her father on his own at a succession of US military bases, Tommy is a artistic creative type who hates the military and the whole business of soldiering, and never misses an opportunity to tell us, and her fellow Army Wives, as much. She lets herself be seduced by Masssengale, whose West Point intellectualism she's attracted to, and nearly sleeps with him - except for that entire Premature Ejaculation thing, which causes him to call it off before it gets to, you know, sex.
Sometimes You Just Got to Go With the Fillion
Every other woman in this book is either a supportive Army Wife, a backbiting Army Wife, or a pair of cute young women (usually but not always nurses) who exist to tempt Sam and his Army buddy du jour into sex.
Most of those who praise this book point out how it's a "cautionary tale" against the Military/Industrial Complex and What A Good Officer and Gentleman really is. What I'm got is less that than a screed against REMFs, while praising Field Commanders to the skies - which works in the context of the story, but misses the point that Field Commanders, by the very nature of what they do, don't focus on anything larger than short-term tactical goals.
I would have liked this story better if it had had a third main character who stood between Sam Damon and Courtney Massengale - a Staff Officer who was interested in more than his personal glory and profit, with field command experience so soldiers could genuinely respect him, and who didn't shoot his mouth off (as Damon often does to his superiors) so his opinions actually got listened to. As it stands, Once an Eagle doesn't feel like it teaches the officers required to read it anything other than "Get out and fight!"
July 2, 2021
Som obligatorisk lesning på US Army og USMC sine krigsskoler så fortjente den et forsøk.
Den innfridde absolutt, og jeg oppfordret alle norske offiserer til å lese den.
I boken følger man Sam Damon og hans forbilledlige reise fra menig i USA-Mexico til generalløytnant i Vietnam.
Damon inspirerer, og kan fort bli et moralsk anker for offiserer og befal.
Vanskelig å beskrive en så lang bok, men reisen er verdt det.
Den innfridde absolutt, og jeg oppfordret alle norske offiserer til å lese den.
I boken følger man Sam Damon og hans forbilledlige reise fra menig i USA-Mexico til generalløytnant i Vietnam.
Damon inspirerer, og kan fort bli et moralsk anker for offiserer og befal.
Vanskelig å beskrive en så lang bok, men reisen er verdt det.
January 9, 2024
Beautifully written book, following small town Nebraska kid Sam Damon from Mexico, thru WWI and WWII, and then up to the beginnings of American involvement in Vietnam. This was an emotional roller-coaster, and something I believe everyone should read. Published in 1968, it is as relevant today as it was back then.
November 29, 2013
Man, if there ever was a book that made me reconsider my decisions and reflect on life, morals, and the important things in life it is Once An Eagle. Sam Damon is easily my favorite fictional character, and Once An Eagle has propelled its way towards the top of my all time favorite books.
This book has taken me through a roller coaster of thoughts and reflections. I admire Sam so much, as anyone should, and wish his life had been easier. Sam is a man of legend from the beginning of the book. He already knows he is different from other people and that he can't possibly live life in his small town, so he decides to join the military. Based off of his intelligence, athleticism, and moral code alone would Sam be someone to look up to, but he continues to astonish me time and time again throughout the book. Earning his fame as the Night Clerk, which stuck with him throughout his life, and wanting to join the military so badly that he rejects West Point upon hearing the wait he will have to go through, even after everything he went through to earn the spot was unbelievable!
I could go on about each and every point and event in this book that inspired me and made me reflect life, but I would be here for a very long time. This book, although rather long (worth it 100 times over), took me a while to finish due to school, and I wish I had been able to give it the attention it deserves and without the sporadic nature I went about reading it. There were large gaps in-between readings so I don't remember everything, but I do know that there was never a moment I wasn't feeling some sort of strong emotion.
There were so many characters in this book and for the duration that they were in the book each one was important. This was a very good thing, but it also made things a bit confusing for my non-Damon-like mind.
Sadness. There was a lot of sadness in this book. I guess you would expect that in an anti-war novel, but when you get attached to characters so strongly as anyone would with Sam Damon, even the slightest pain felt by him is magnified in the reader, or at least for me personally.
There is so much I could just go on and on about in this book, but basically it was just an amazing read. I came to love Sam as a human being I would feel honored to have known. I came to utterly despise the man who called people by their first names (I never knew someone calling someone "Samuel" could piss me off as much as it did in this book.), and I came to look back onto decisions I had made, and things I had thought I considered important. This book has made me reflect life so much more than any other book, and I think every time I read it, it will have the same effect. Ah, I want to just go on into every aspect, thought, feeling, emotion, etc. that I experienced while reading this book, but very soon it will grow repetitive, rant-like, boring perhaps, and never-ending for sure. The one thing I can say for sure about this book is that it is an amazing piece of work and I will never forget it. I will read and enjoy this book many times in my life before I find I cannot any longer. I want to end this review differently, and give it the praise it deserves, but I'm sure Sam would rather not have anything special done on his account.
Even when no one in the world would deserve it more than he.
This book has taken me through a roller coaster of thoughts and reflections. I admire Sam so much, as anyone should, and wish his life had been easier. Sam is a man of legend from the beginning of the book. He already knows he is different from other people and that he can't possibly live life in his small town, so he decides to join the military. Based off of his intelligence, athleticism, and moral code alone would Sam be someone to look up to, but he continues to astonish me time and time again throughout the book. Earning his fame as the Night Clerk, which stuck with him throughout his life, and wanting to join the military so badly that he rejects West Point upon hearing the wait he will have to go through, even after everything he went through to earn the spot was unbelievable!
I could go on about each and every point and event in this book that inspired me and made me reflect life, but I would be here for a very long time. This book, although rather long (worth it 100 times over), took me a while to finish due to school, and I wish I had been able to give it the attention it deserves and without the sporadic nature I went about reading it. There were large gaps in-between readings so I don't remember everything, but I do know that there was never a moment I wasn't feeling some sort of strong emotion.
There were so many characters in this book and for the duration that they were in the book each one was important. This was a very good thing, but it also made things a bit confusing for my non-Damon-like mind.
Sadness. There was a lot of sadness in this book. I guess you would expect that in an anti-war novel, but when you get attached to characters so strongly as anyone would with Sam Damon, even the slightest pain felt by him is magnified in the reader, or at least for me personally.
There is so much I could just go on and on about in this book, but basically it was just an amazing read. I came to love Sam as a human being I would feel honored to have known. I came to utterly despise the man who called people by their first names (I never knew someone calling someone "Samuel" could piss me off as much as it did in this book.), and I came to look back onto decisions I had made, and things I had thought I considered important. This book has made me reflect life so much more than any other book, and I think every time I read it, it will have the same effect. Ah, I want to just go on into every aspect, thought, feeling, emotion, etc. that I experienced while reading this book, but very soon it will grow repetitive, rant-like, boring perhaps, and never-ending for sure. The one thing I can say for sure about this book is that it is an amazing piece of work and I will never forget it. I will read and enjoy this book many times in my life before I find I cannot any longer. I want to end this review differently, and give it the praise it deserves, but I'm sure Sam would rather not have anything special done on his account.
Even when no one in the world would deserve it more than he.
July 19, 2009
I bought this book because I discovered it was on the required reading list at the US Military Academy at Westpoint. This intrigued me because the book is a work of fiction and I couldn't fathom why a work of fiction would be a required read at Westpoint. I know many grads of Westpoint and know a former instructor and a current instructor and two of my Eagle Scouts are cadets at Westpoint so I also read it for that reason.
What I discovered was probably one of the most succinct theses on leadership I've ever read. I think that says something because I was an NCO in the military and have been involved in the Boy Scouts for over 30 years. Leadership is something I have a little experience, to say the least.
Myrers teaches the reader leadership through his fictional story in the most vivid ways. He follows the life of a young man from a small town who enlists in the Army and follows him from the Punitive Expedition into Mexico to France in World War I to China between the wars to the Pacific in World War II and finally to Viet-Nam in the 60s. His natural born leadership ability and initiative takes him from a junior NCO to a General. This experience makes him an advocate for enlisted men and the disgraceful way they were treated by officers. Anyone who has served has known officers who treat enlisted men as a necessary evil and beneath their station. Their wives are sometimes even worse. In fairness, some enlisted men (and their wives) treat those of lower rank with the same disregard. Myrers paints a beautiful portrait of this mistreatment and its effects on enlisted soldiers.
I used to wonder why Academy graduates (of all 3 academies) were so different than officers who did not attend the academies. I think I have a greater understanding of why Academy grads have such a different attitude towards the enlisted ranks than non-grads. Academy grads take better care of their men than non-grads. I'm not sure if Annapolis and the Air Force Academy require this book to be read or if they have similar books (hey, I'll have to find out). I do find it interesting that an officer I knew who treated the enlisted worse than any I served with rose through the ranks like Myrer's character. Perhaps "Once an Eagle" should be required reading for Officer Candidate Schools and perhaps even NCO Schools. I think we'd end up with better leaders as a result.
Even for those not interested in leadership principles will enjoy this book because it is also the story of the sacrifices and privations suffered by the members of our Armed Forces. In many ways "Once an Eagle" is also a tribute to all who have served, particularly those who have served during times of war.
What I discovered was probably one of the most succinct theses on leadership I've ever read. I think that says something because I was an NCO in the military and have been involved in the Boy Scouts for over 30 years. Leadership is something I have a little experience, to say the least.
Myrers teaches the reader leadership through his fictional story in the most vivid ways. He follows the life of a young man from a small town who enlists in the Army and follows him from the Punitive Expedition into Mexico to France in World War I to China between the wars to the Pacific in World War II and finally to Viet-Nam in the 60s. His natural born leadership ability and initiative takes him from a junior NCO to a General. This experience makes him an advocate for enlisted men and the disgraceful way they were treated by officers. Anyone who has served has known officers who treat enlisted men as a necessary evil and beneath their station. Their wives are sometimes even worse. In fairness, some enlisted men (and their wives) treat those of lower rank with the same disregard. Myrers paints a beautiful portrait of this mistreatment and its effects on enlisted soldiers.
I used to wonder why Academy graduates (of all 3 academies) were so different than officers who did not attend the academies. I think I have a greater understanding of why Academy grads have such a different attitude towards the enlisted ranks than non-grads. Academy grads take better care of their men than non-grads. I'm not sure if Annapolis and the Air Force Academy require this book to be read or if they have similar books (hey, I'll have to find out). I do find it interesting that an officer I knew who treated the enlisted worse than any I served with rose through the ranks like Myrer's character. Perhaps "Once an Eagle" should be required reading for Officer Candidate Schools and perhaps even NCO Schools. I think we'd end up with better leaders as a result.
Even for those not interested in leadership principles will enjoy this book because it is also the story of the sacrifices and privations suffered by the members of our Armed Forces. In many ways "Once an Eagle" is also a tribute to all who have served, particularly those who have served during times of war.
February 16, 2010
My favorite novel. It is thick but every bit as timeless and brilliant as a couple of other sweeping epics, the Illiad and the Odyssey.
A quick look and it is obvious it is about war and soldiering, however, it is so well crafted that it would leave any reader uplifted and touched. Yes, war is ugly, yet the virtues that the hero, Sam Damon, possesses are what we should hope that all of our soldiers ascribe to model their own values upon. Although the story is a work of fiction, throughout the book you find yourself consistently wondering if Sam is loosely (or tightly) based upon a real life figure; or as the epic tale travels across various eras (from WWI through every major conflict through Vietnam), is he based upon many enigmatic figures. Hard to tell.
Although much less admirable, the anti-hero, Courtney Massengale, is an obvious synthesis of the 'careerist' officer who is unfortunately still so common today; but he is actually the perfect foil to contrast Sam's every virtue. Where it seems Sam's every word or action is based upon principle and "mission first, soldiers always", Courtney is a political animal whose ethics bely a single-mindedness towards career first. Where Sam is an example of someone from modest roots who eagerly takes on the difficult job of troop leading at every level in combat, pedigreed Courtney only seeks out those jobs that will advance his position the quickest, generally in a posh headquarters as far from the front lines as he can manage.
I have no idea if the author, Anton Myrer, ever wrote anything else so compelling as I've yet to pick up another but I will. This masterpiece demands that you should give some of his other works a try.
If you are young military leader (or hope to be) or completely anti-war, I can safely assure that Once an Eagle is a page-turner and simultaneously very uplifting and infinitely entertaining.
A quick look and it is obvious it is about war and soldiering, however, it is so well crafted that it would leave any reader uplifted and touched. Yes, war is ugly, yet the virtues that the hero, Sam Damon, possesses are what we should hope that all of our soldiers ascribe to model their own values upon. Although the story is a work of fiction, throughout the book you find yourself consistently wondering if Sam is loosely (or tightly) based upon a real life figure; or as the epic tale travels across various eras (from WWI through every major conflict through Vietnam), is he based upon many enigmatic figures. Hard to tell.
Although much less admirable, the anti-hero, Courtney Massengale, is an obvious synthesis of the 'careerist' officer who is unfortunately still so common today; but he is actually the perfect foil to contrast Sam's every virtue. Where it seems Sam's every word or action is based upon principle and "mission first, soldiers always", Courtney is a political animal whose ethics bely a single-mindedness towards career first. Where Sam is an example of someone from modest roots who eagerly takes on the difficult job of troop leading at every level in combat, pedigreed Courtney only seeks out those jobs that will advance his position the quickest, generally in a posh headquarters as far from the front lines as he can manage.
I have no idea if the author, Anton Myrer, ever wrote anything else so compelling as I've yet to pick up another but I will. This masterpiece demands that you should give some of his other works a try.
If you are young military leader (or hope to be) or completely anti-war, I can safely assure that Once an Eagle is a page-turner and simultaneously very uplifting and infinitely entertaining.
Read
February 27, 2012Myrer in some ways wrote the ur-military "adventure" book, as its ubiquity on military reading lists suggests. It is the story of a youthful US volunteer - Sam Damon - who earns the Medal of Honor and an officership in WWI, stays on with the US Army in the interwar period, fights skilfully and bravely in WWII, and ascends to high command. Myrer emphasizes traditional military virtues in describing Damon's wars, but devotes at least as much space to describing life in a peacetime military. Myrer seems deeply ambivalent about the necessity of war: Damon's experiences lead him to prophecy the dangers of the military-industrial complex after WWII and to plead for the US to change its frame of mind regarding the rest of the world, not to assume an adversarial relationship but to work for peace. In short, without quite denying the inevitability of war, he makes a case for cherishing the hope that there might not be war.
Damon's antagonist, Courtney Massengale, is an essential villain, standing for personal advancement while disregarding others' welfare, particularly under his command. In Myrer's world, it is the wicked who prosper, but the good who can sleep at night; middle ground is scarce. This Manichean reality is expressed most pointedly and absurdly by Massengale's intimately-described but still confusing sexual dysfunction.
Eagle is the book for those who want to learn something of Army life in the last century and perhaps any century. It is also an impassioned account of war and the reasons to be on the side of peace. It is a great work of military literature, standing far above the standard "shoot-em-ups" the genre is known for. I do not, however, believe it is "great literature."
Damon's antagonist, Courtney Massengale, is an essential villain, standing for personal advancement while disregarding others' welfare, particularly under his command. In Myrer's world, it is the wicked who prosper, but the good who can sleep at night; middle ground is scarce. This Manichean reality is expressed most pointedly and absurdly by Massengale's intimately-described but still confusing sexual dysfunction.
Eagle is the book for those who want to learn something of Army life in the last century and perhaps any century. It is also an impassioned account of war and the reasons to be on the side of peace. It is a great work of military literature, standing far above the standard "shoot-em-ups" the genre is known for. I do not, however, believe it is "great literature."
Displaying 1 - 30 of 528 reviews