What do you think?
Rate this book
468 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published October 1, 1985
I remember this being a really exciting and fast-moving alt-history thriller when I first read it. It's still exciting but it's not exactly fast-moving.
It's a great story: a team from 1975 gets sent back to 1939 to try and change history so that WW2 - which is still going on in their world - can be stopped or changed or slowed down. They view it as an irregular but still routine mission and settle into their disguised lives in New York and London. Of course, complications set in...
Historically, this is great: Mr Hogan does a bang-up job of viewing British and U.S. lives from the perspective of someone from the future and how blind everyone is to the coming conflict, even those who believe that it's inevitable. The portrayals of historical figures - Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden, Franklin Roosevelt, Albert Einstein and Isaac Asimov, amongst many others - make guest appearances here - feel realistic, although someone with more knowledge in this area may beg to differ. The other characters, straight out of central casting, have little depth, except for the one soldier who is clearly the point-of-view surrogate for the audience. The rest appear to serve only plot purposes: the crafty leader who knows more than he lets on; the smarmy smartarse who has a secret past; the troubled intellectual; the strong-but-silent CO, I could - and frequently do - go on.
But the story saves them. There is a sense of impending HISTORY hanging over the plot as the team compare what happened in their world with what happens in this one and note the deviations, which leads it to the problems that slow it down: the infodumping. There are lengthy paragraphs and conversations scattered throughout the text indicating what's happening and explaining the facts behind the fiction. They're not a problem, more a feature of this sort of story where the reader needs to be kept in the loop (time-travel joke!) about the plot. But more than occasionally we get chapter-long screeds about how important some historical moments were, or how the science of the plot works and it really does take you out of the story when they could have been dealt with far more economically.
That said, it is nice to read an alt-history that I actually finished. It is not my favourite sub-genre as it often feels more like an exercise for the reader to determine just how clever the author has been a choosing the moment where they decided history might deviate rather than an exercise in writing a good book. Alternately (ha!), it can often insult the intelligence of an author because regardless of how different the histories are, we still always wind up with Shakespeare or Napoleon or Austen rather than someone else.
So while this isn't brilliant, it's great fun and keeps you entertained. And there's nothing wrong with that in any world.