What do you think?
Rate this book
Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People
This book asks an important question often ignored by ancient historians and political scientists Why did Athenian democracy work as well and for as long as it did? Josiah Ober seeks the answer by analyzing the sociology of Athenian politics and the nature of communication between elite and nonelite citizens. After a preliminary survey of the development of the Athenian "constitution," he focuses on the role of political and legal rhetoric. As jurymen and Assemblymen, the citizen masses of Athens retained important powers, and elite Athenian politicians and litigants needed to address these large bodies of ordinary citizens in terms understandable and acceptable to the audience. This book probes the social strategies behind the rhetorical tactics employed by elite speakers.
A close reading of the speeches exposes both egalitarian and elitist elements in Athenian popular ideology. Ober demonstrates that the vocabulary of public speech constituted a democratic discourse that allowed the Athenians to resolve contradictions between the ideal of political equality and the reality of social inequality. His radical reevaluation of leadership and political power in classical Athens restores key elements of the social and ideological context of the first western democracy.
A close reading of the speeches exposes both egalitarian and elitist elements in Athenian popular ideology. Ober demonstrates that the vocabulary of public speech constituted a democratic discourse that allowed the Athenians to resolve contradictions between the ideal of political equality and the reality of social inequality. His radical reevaluation of leadership and political power in classical Athens restores key elements of the social and ideological context of the first western democracy.
408 pages, Paperback
First published May 1, 1989
About the author
Josiah Ober
34 books31 followersJosiah Ober is Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis Professor in honor of Constantine Mitsotakis, and Professor of Classics and Political Science, at Stanford University.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
January 14, 2012
Tiddlywinks. Basically... just playing with the tokens or counters (rearranging bits of text) unearthed by other (and real) scholars from 100 years ago
... imposing modern day political categories on ancient and archaic societies (where none of those categories fit or are in the least relevant, a procedure which is then justified by 20 pages of talking about Althusser... (who is equally irrelevant to a study of ancient Athens).
A good example of what passes for the Humanities in this day and age.
But hey..., I'm on Goodreads and he's at Princeton.... so take this magno cum grano salis...
... imposing modern day political categories on ancient and archaic societies (where none of those categories fit or are in the least relevant, a procedure which is then justified by 20 pages of talking about Althusser... (who is equally irrelevant to a study of ancient Athens).
A good example of what passes for the Humanities in this day and age.
But hey..., I'm on Goodreads and he's at Princeton.... so take this magno cum grano salis...
November 14, 2021
I was very impressed with Ober’s mastery of the source materials and approach to ancient democracy. He shows how it worked and why it proved so efficient.
February 15, 2016
This book is an excellent introduction to Athenian political forms and realities. I would strongly recommend this book to anyone interested in the ancient world, but also to anyone interested in understanding the history of Democracy, its flaws, and its strengths.
January 6, 2023
城邦雅典的民主制，依托着「由大地而生」的神话基础。大地即（某种意义上）永存的雅典城邦，雅典人紧紧依托着这一存在，以排除一半内部居民（女性）和阻断所有外部（外邦人）为代价，实现了一个高度限制下均一的共同体（雅典男子自由民）内部的平等。而在这个共同体内部，等级被尽量削弱，而个体也同时被尽可能的削弱，每个人的生存意义都仅为城邦而存在。每个制度均有其存在的历史环境，不想轻率的进行批评，只是从审美上，我确实不喜欢这样的社会，更偏好希腊化君主国，那种公开承认社会阶层、但无论对内对外都有更大流动性和多样性的世界
June 19, 2014
Josiah Ober tries so hard to pretend hoplite social structure, or warfare at all, affected Athenian Democracy. And he is very, very wrong to do so. He is a weak writer, and at times I almost fell asleep trying to finish it. I would NOT recommend to anyone who doesn't know enough about ancient Greece to recognize Ober's oversights.
Read
September 25, 2015Examines the political dynamics between different classes in democratic Athens, with an emphasis on the role of persuasive speaking in the assembly and the court system.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews