Buy used:
$2.29
$3.98 delivery Wednesday, July 9. Details
Or fastest delivery July 3 - 8. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Item in good condition. Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc...
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences 1st Edition

4.0 out of 5 stars 36 ratings

This book is an expanded and revised edition of the author's critically acclaimed volume Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. In twenty-six succinct chapters, Jon Elster provides an account of the nature of explanation in the social sciences. He offers an overview of key explanatory mechanisms in the social sciences, relying on hundreds of examples and drawing on a large variety of sources-psychology, behavioral economics, biology, political science, historical writings, philosophy and fiction. Written in accessible and jargon-free language, Elster aims at accuracy and clarity while eschewing formal models.

There is a newer edition of this item:

Editorial Reviews

Review

"...contains many interesting puzzles and examples, and excellent elementary discussions of the major concepts of the social sciences...a treasure trove of suitable and interesting case-studies and examples..." --Dean Rickles, University of Sydney: Philosophy in Review

Book Description

This book is an expanded and revised edition of the author's critically acclaimed Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Cambridge University Press
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 30, 2007
  • Edition ‏ : ‎ 1st
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 484 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0521777445
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0521777445
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.5 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 1.25 x 8.75 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.0 out of 5 stars 36 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Jon Elster
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4 out of 5 stars
36 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book insightful, with one review noting how it combines neuroscience with folk wisdom and literature. Moreover, the book is well-written, with one customer mentioning it can be read piece by piece. However, the pacing receives mixed reactions, with some finding it interesting while others describe it as boring.

Select to learn more

13 customers mention "Insights"11 positive2 negative

Customers appreciate the book's insights, with multiple reviews highlighting its explanations of social behavior. One customer notes how it combines neuroscience with folk wisdom and literature, while another mentions its comprehensive coverage of human nature and society.

"...I was particularly interested in Chapter 23 on Collective Belief Formation, Chapter 24 on Collective Action, Chapter 25 on Collective Decision Making..." Read more

"...he is largely successful, and that this is a very useful approach for humanists and social scientists (although not for natural scientists)...." Read more

"The book will certainly introduce you with many interesting ideas and theories on human nature and society...." Read more

"This book gives Elsters view on social behavior; much of it from an economics perspective that sees rational action as the basic driver of behavior...." Read more

8 customers mention "Readability"8 positive0 negative

Customers find the book well-written and easy to read, with one customer noting that it can be read piece by piece.

"...It is a great read. I found out about Explaining Social Behavior from a Twitter link with the favorite books of Nicolas Taleb...." Read more

"...of rational choice theory is both compatible with the facts, and extremely useful, as much of applied economics attests to...." Read more

"...It is well written throughout; very clear in the ideas and the examples used to illustrate them." Read more

"...This book retains his famous edge, with sharp, well-written, knowledgeable comments that can sum up or devastate a whole field in a few sentences...." Read more

7 customers mention "Pacing"4 positive3 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the pacing of the book, with some finding it interesting and incisive, while others describe it as boring and pedantic.

"...Swan, this book is filled with aphorisms, keen insights and clever turns of phrase. I leave you with some of my favorites: *..." Read more

"...Organization is confusing and overall boring...." Read more

"...It was brilliant, incisive, and devastating in the 1970s when he first made it. He has not significantly updated it...." Read more

"...One of the possible explanation is that the book is less academic...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2012
    Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
    Jon Elster says, "Choice remains the core concept in the social sciences." In this book he proceeds to describe the complexity behind our many choices. If you are looking for a light, breezy read that simplifies human behavior, veer away from this one. But if you want a grand sweep of human behavior, this could be the ticket.

    The pages work to synthesize psychology, sociology and neuroscience with folk wisdom and literature. One of his central arguments is that qualitative social science is actually more useful than quantitative social science. Yet at the same time he is a loyal reductionist.

    One commonality that Explaining Social Behavior has with contemporary pop psychology is that it outlines emotion as being more central than logic. What the book does not do is reduce human emotion to simple axiomatic truths. Instead, Elster presents emotion as the messy business it really is.

    Predicting social behavior is challenging since our emotions are guided by the context of situations, perceptual and cognitive limitations and the shifting circumstances and opportunities of each individual. The author says, "It is easier to change a persons' circumstances and opportunities than to change their minds." A key insight.

    From this base of circumstances and opportunities leading to emotion, Elster suggests that we form desires and beliefs that lead to information gathering and action. This model of human behavior makes intuitive sense, and it is the closest thing to a central theory in the book. He calls this the desire-belief model.

    As someone involved with both marketing and adult learning, I was eager to hear the author's take on motivation. In short, he sees motivation as a competing array of forces including the visceral and the rational, the shortsighted and farsighted, the selfish and altruistic . . . all amid wants to wishes that are subject to the desire-belief model.

    Elster's views on motivation can be contrasted with the view of Daniel Pink in Drive, where Pink argues that people want autonomy, mastery and purpose. There are many other theories on motivation as well, from carrots and sticks to Theory X & Y. The authors ideas about motivation seem to align with mine -- in that there are many ways to motivate or be motivated; the challenge is fit the context of each situation.

    I was particularly interested in Chapter 23 on Collective Belief Formation, Chapter 24 on Collective Action, Chapter 25 on Collective Decision Making, and Chapter 26 on Organizations and Institutions. Elster shows how collective belief starts with a few individuals and gains steam through motivations ranging from self-interest to peer pressure, guilt, personal growth and the desire for raw adventure. Collective decision making is made through a combination of arguing, bargaining and voting.

    Organizations are defined by their capacity for centralized decision making. These bodies may have members or employees, with rights governed by constitutions which need to balance power. Key organizational challenges include constructing proper incentives and aligning principals and agents with the needs of the organization.

    This book is filled with insights into human nature and nurture. It is a great read. I found out about Explaining Social Behavior from a Twitter link with the favorite books of Nicolas Taleb. As with Taleb's book, The Black Swan, this book is filled with aphorisms, keen insights and clever turns of phrase. I leave you with some of my favorites:

    * The good social scientist has to consistently think against oneself -- to make matters as difficult for oneself as one can.
    * To excel at anything is to deviate, and deviation is the object of universal disapproval.
    * The invention of game theory may come to be seen as the most important single advance of the social sciences in the twentieth century. Games illuminate the structure of the two central issues of social interaction -- cooperation and coordination.
    * Behavior is often no more stable than the situations that shape it.
    * It is simply not true that people are aggressive, impatient, extroverted, or talkative across the board.
    * The ratio of fear of loss to the desire for gain is empirically about 2.5 to 1.
    * Delay strategies might seem to hold out the best promise for dealing with emotion-based irrationality.
    * To understand a work of art is to explain it in terms of the antecedent mental states of its creator.
    * Whereas too much rationality can be unintelligible, irrationality can be perfectly intelligible.
    * As misunderstandings are dissipated, felicity ensues; as ignorance is lifted, disaster occurs.
    * If debates are held in public, the quality of argument will suffer. If they take place behind closed doors, arguing may degenerate into bargaining.
    * Reciprocal altruism is not a plausible mechanism for generating cooperation in larger groups.
    * Egoism, said Tocqueville, is "the rust of society." Similarly, is is often said that trust is "the lubricant of society."
    * An autocratic government is unable to make itself unable to interfere.
    * Rational choice theory is subjective through and through.
    * The brain is a natural conspiracy theorist.
    * All explanation is causal explanation.

    The Black Swan
    Status Anxiety
    Man's Search for Meaning
    The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
    8 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on February 29, 2012
    Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
    Jon Elster's strength is his deep understanding of behavioral science as well as the classical writers on human nature and human society. In the past several years, his goal has been to join the two, throwing in the natural sciences, to explain more fully the nature of society. He says (p. 246) "In a common view, the scientific enterprise has three distincti parts or branches: the humanities, the social sciences, and the natural sciences...but...a rigid distinction may prefent cross-fertilization...the social sciences can benefit from the biological study of human beings and other animals...interpretation of works of art and explanation are closely related enterprises." I think he is largely successful, and that this is a very useful approach for humanists and social scientists (although not for natural scientists). The number of insights per page in this book is prodigious, and it should be widely read.

    I have several criticisms of Elster's exposition. In part, our differences may have narrowed or disappeared, as this book was published in 2007 and doubtless written a few years before that.

    Elster's treatment of altruism is very Kantian. An act is altruistic if it benefits another at a cost to oneself, and one was motivated to undertake the act in order to benefit the other person. This, I believe, is absurd. If I really care about another person's welfare, then it pleases me to help this person. It is in my self-interest to behave altruistically. Very often I use the term self-regarding rather that self-interested, precisely because a truly moral person has a self-interest in being other-regarding. Part of my satisfaction in performing the altruistic act is that so doing is morally right, and I get satisfaction from behaving in a morally correct manner. But it may not. I may think there is nothing especially moral about being helpful or considerate or loyal--it just gives me satisfaction. Similarly, I may punish bad acts of others not because I want to change society for the better, but because I am personally very angry at the behavior. If I scream at a bad driver on the road, I am not trying to improve his driving behavior; I am trying to make him feel bad, and I might not care a whit whether it affects his behavior.

    Elster's treatment of rational choice is fquite knowledgeable and sophisticated. But he presents the theory in a manner that renders it empirically incorrect, and gives no way to improve upon it, except to talk about emotions and irrationality. Rational choice theory assumes agents have a subjective prior over the effect of their choices on outcomes (beliefs), a set of transitive, consistent preferences over outcomes (preferences), and the face constraints in making their choices (such as limited information and resources). A rather strong form, but which I think is generally acceptable, is that rational agents update their subjective prior using something equivalent to Bayes rule. That is all. Elster insists that "rational choice theorists want to explain behavior on the bare assumpton that agents are rational." (p. 191) This I call the fallacy of methodological individualism, which is rampant in economics, and is empirically false (see my book Bounds of Reason, Princeton 2009).

    A stripped-down version of rational choice theory is both compatible with the facts, and extremely useful, as much of applied economics attests to. The main weakness of the theory, I believe, is the assumption that beliefs are personal (subjective prior), when in fact beliefs are generally the product of social linkages among complexly networked minds, and probabilities are resident in distributed cognition over this network. Elster's discussion of beliefs is again very rich, but he does not present the networked character of minds and the relationship of such networks or the formation and transformation of beliefs.

    Elster's description of game theory is very useful and his suggested readings are excellent. However, he criticizes game theory for "predictive failures" (p.337), including behavior in finitely repeated games that are subject to analysis using backward induction. These games include the repeated prisoner's dilemma, the centipede game, and the traveler's dilemma. In all cases, backward induction gives a result that is very far from how people play the game. For instance, in the repeated prisoner's dilemma and the centipede game, backward induction says to defect on the first round, whereas in fact in a long game, people generally cooperate until near the very end of the game. However, the use of backward induction, while very common in game theory, cannot be justified by rationality alone. Rather, you need the common knowledge of rationality (CKR), which I believe is a very suspect epistemological condition---see Bounds of Reason, or the paper on CKR on my web site (under submission).

    I think Elster should subject this book to a bit of rewriting, but meanwhile is is about the best book available on the topic.
    14 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2011
    Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
    The book will certainly introduce you with many interesting ideas and theories on human nature and society. However, it won't give you much, if you are already familiar with classical writers and philosophers like Stendhal, Balzac, Nietzsche, Pascal, Dostoevsky and others.

    It is not that he 'peppered' his explanations with their examples as the other reader noted; I rather had a feeling that Elster simply reviewed their writings with only few original thoughts added.

    I would rather recommend buying original works as you would gain much more from them than from this abridged review of everything.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2013
    Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
    This book gives Elsters view on social behavior; much of it from an economics perspective that sees rational action as the basic driver of behavior. But, Elster always peeks around the sidelines, and discovers places where the theories do not quite fit the facts, and may need to be changed. Much of his thinking is around how individual people think and act, and the book ends up being a broad critique of "simple" descriptions of rationality. Much of what he describes is still problematic now, although the book was written a few years ago. But the writing is not in the form of criticizing in order to condemn; he is consistently pushing towards ways of improving our understanding of how individuals make decisions and societies function. The book is long, but each chapter is well contained, so it can be read piece by piece. It is well written throughout; very clear in the ideas and the examples used to illustrate them.

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Tim Ruffles
    5.0 out of 5 stars The most valuable book I've read on the social sciences
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 20, 2015
    Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
    So far, the most valuable book I've read on the social sciences (I've not finished it yet). Rigorous without being stodgy.

    Hopefully I'll get time to write more about it as I go!
  • 職業・マンガ評論家
    5.0 out of 5 stars 「知」への入り口(本物)
    Reviewed in Japan on June 13, 2023
    Format: eTextbookVerified Purchase
    もし、知の世界を知りたい、人類の叡智の最先端に触れたい、と思ってこのページにたどり着いたならあなたは運がいい。
    この道であってます。(ダークソウルかエルデンリング風に言えば「この先正解があるぞ」。)

    その理由は主に2つ

    1. 信頼性
    人生は短く読書に使える時間(とお金)は限られています。
    本当に知の世界に通じているかどうか分からない本を読んで無駄にすることはできませんよね?
    私も著者Jon Elsterのことは知りませんでしたが、ノーベル経済学賞を受賞したRichard Thalerの共同研究者であり「Nudge」の共著者であるCass Sunsteinが別の著書を紹介していたのを見てこの本にたどり着きました。
    結局人間は森羅万象を知ることはできないのである事柄を信頼していいかどうかは「信頼できる人による評価」によるしかないわけですが、その意味でこの本は現時点で最先端の人類の叡智の一部であることが保証されています。

    2. 内容
    2010年代までの主要な科学研究の成果がほぼ網羅されています。
    行動経済学やゲーム理論といった最新の研究がかなり分かりやすく解説されているのと同時にトクヴィルやモンテーニュなど過去の思想家の文章もかなり多く引用されています。(特にトクヴィル。洒落ではありません。)
    また終わりの方に社会科学を志す者が読むべき本の例として多くの歴史的名著が挙げられています。
    この本は2010年時点の人類の知の成果を俯瞰的に解説した上でさらにその可能性について考察する「知についての知」の本であり、この本自体が知の大いなる凝縮ですが、読者がさらなる知を求めて読書を発展させる契機にも富んでいます。
    (なおポストモダニズムや脱構築の類はある意味袋小路ということもこの本を読むとわかります。)

    長いし、概念的な文章が多いので読むのには苦労しますが、ところどころイメージしやすいように具体的な事例が挙げられていますし、実は慣れればむしろstraight forwardで理解しやすい文章です。
    この本を読むことは人生の時間の有意義な使い方だと思いますよ。
    運よくこのページを見つけた方はぜひどうぞ。
    Report
  • Daniel Sommer
    4.0 out of 5 stars Übersichtliche Zusammenfassung
    Reviewed in Germany on December 6, 2013
    Format: eTextbookVerified Purchase
    Übersichtliche und anschauliche Zusammenfassung von Jon Elsters sozialwissenschaftlichem Denken, insbesondere seiner Bearbeitung des "Rational Choice"-Ansatzes. Elster erklärt anhand von lebensnahen Beispielen. Die Kindle-Version ist wissenschaftlich nicht zitierfähig, da keine Angabe der Seitenzahlen möglich!
  • Yosh Höchstselbst
    3.0 out of 5 stars Schön zu lesen, aber...
    Reviewed in Germany on December 20, 2012
    Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
    ... nach einem gelesenen Kapitel weiß man eigentlich gar nicht so recht, was einem der Autor vermitteln wollte. Allzu oft verliert man den Faden zwischen Elsters sprunghaften Verweisen, zahlreichen Randbemerkungen und Ergänzungen. Wir lasen das Buch im Rahmen des Basisseminars "Politische Theorie" (B.A.-Studiengangang Politikwissenschaft) und am Ende jedes Seminars standen sämtliche Teilnehmer mit mehr Fragezeichen über den Köpfen da, als zu Beginn des Seminars.