What do you think?
Rate this book
278 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1983
At the forefront, I think the “sequel of Flatland” appellation usually given to Planiverse does much disservice to it. Rather, a simple “Flatland-inspired world” ought to be enough to pay homage to Abbott’s masterpiece without causing subconscious comparisons between the two while reading.
Overall, it is an intriguing book to read, and the general tone is of scientific inquisition, something I enjoyed significantly. Kudos to the author’s imagination and his scientific rigor in wanting to make our lower-dimensional (or were they? ;) ) brethren seem plausible to the skeptic-minded.
More than a narrative structure, the book reads as a world-building exercise and a sort of thinly-veiled (or rather with a thin padding of a story) fable presenting the author’s attempt at scientifically sound construction of 2D equivalents of the sciences. The intricate animal biology, the mechanical constructs of the Planiverse mechanics and the allied descriptions, are interspersed with occasional parallels (satirical?) with our own societies’ political constructs.
On the down side, I felt it was very little story and too much world building. A lot of excessive descriptions of the 2D-universe gets a little stale after a while, especially the really redundant pieces towards the middle part. Here is where the Flatland comparison is detrimental, since not only does Planiverse not enjoy the element of first-time intrigue as did Flatland, but also lacks the general strength of story that was important in the latter. Moreover, many ideas are repeated (Although Planiverse adds a great deal to the universe and is considerably different from that of Flatland). Some parts were laboriously slow moving, and I felt the ending was a bit too abrupt and perhaps, unnecessarily cryptic.